Lawrence Lessig

In my view, including civil society and representatives from the Global South in frontier AI governance is critical for equitable and democratic AI development. If we exclude these voices, we risk entrenching existing inequalities and fostering technologies that serve only a few. The perspectives of diverse communities are indispensable if we want AI systems to reflect a broad spectrum of human values and priorities, not just those of the most technologically advanced nations.

I strongly believe we should rewrite the US Constitution to reflect modern values and address systemic issues. Our current political system is plagued by corruption and inequality, and a new constitution could pave the way for a more just and democratic society.

I strongly believe that approval voting is a vital reform for our electoral system. It enables voters to express their preferences more fully and reduces the likelihood of spoilers and strategic voting. By allowing voters to support all the candidates they approve of, we can foster a more representative and democratic election process.

Our legal system has become too complex and is in urgent need of simplification. By reducing the number of laws, we can make them more comprehensible, thus bringing justice closer to the people and reducing the undue influence of special interests.

As someone deeply concerned with digital ethics and transparency, I believe AI-generated content should be clearly labeled. Users deserve to know the source of the content they consume to make informed judgments about its reliability and bias. Labeling AI-generated content can help foster a more transparent and trustworthy digital environment.

As an advocate for transparency and accountability in technology and government, I believe that AI systems above a certain capability threshold should be required to have interpretable decision-making processes. This is essential for ensuring that these powerful technologies are used ethically and are subject to public oversight. Without interpretability, it becomes challenging to hold creators and users of AI accountable for their decisions, which can significantly impact society.

Intellectual property, as it currently stands, often stifles creativity and innovation rather than promoting it. In the digital age, we need a system that better balances the interests of creators and the public. Abolishing the current regime could pave the way for new models that encourage sharing and collaboration, which are essential for cultural and technological progress.

As a strong advocate for transparency and accountability, I believe AI systems must provide explanations for their decisions. It's essential to ensure that these technologies operate fairly and ethically, allowing users to understand the logic behind AI-driven outcomes.

I believe a UN-led body should oversee AI development to ensure that the incredible power of AI is harnessed responsibly and ethically. Similar to nuclear technology, AI has the potential to profoundly impact society, both positively and negatively. We need global cooperation to set standards and monitor developments to protect public interest.

As a society and legal structure evolves, I believe that laws should be revisited and reviewed regularly. Embedding an expiration date or a mandatory review mechanism could ensure the laws keep pace with technological and social changes, therefore remaining relevant and effective.

While I support reforming copyright laws to foster creativity and access to knowledge, I believe completely abolishing them would undermine the fundamental incentive for creators to produce new works and innovations.