Vint Cerf

While I recognize the transformative potential of language models, intellectual property rights must be preserved. We need a balanced approach where LLMs can be used for educational and research applications under fair use, but full-scale reproduction of copyrighted material should be restricted. Creative and compensatory frameworks could be the solution to uphold the rights of creators while fostering innovation.

I believe that AI, like any technology, has the potential to be decentralized and democratized. With open standards and collaborative development, we can ensure AI benefits everyone and avoids concentrating power.

As someone deeply invested in technology's impact on society, I believe AI can be a powerful tool in preserving indigenous languages and cultures. These languages hold unique ways of understanding the world, and by leveraging AI, we can help document, revitalize, and sustain them for future generations. This aligns with technology's broader role in enhancing and preserving human heritage.

As a technologist, I see both sides of the debate around AI art generators compensating original artists. While it's important to protect artists' rights, we must also consider the potential constraints on innovation and creativity in the digital realm. These issues require nuanced discussion and regulation.