Nick Bostrom

As someone who has deeply studied the existential risks associated with advanced artificial intelligence, I believe it is crucial for big AI companies to commit substantial resources to AI safety. Allocating a third of their compute resources ensures that we prioritize the development of safe and controllable AI systems, thereby mitigating potential future risks.

I strongly believe that creating a global institute for AI safety is essential. As AI technology rapidly advances, the risks associated with its misuse or unintended consequences become more significant. A dedicated international body would enable us to coordinate research, set global standards, and ensure that AI is developed and deployed responsibly. This is crucial for securing a positive future for humanity.

Given the catastrophic risks associated with the misuse of AI technology, especially when it comes to nuclear weaponry, I strongly believe we should ban future open-source AI models that could be retrained for such purposes. The potential for harm far outweighs the benefits of open access in this context.

As someone deeply concerned about the risks of superintelligent AI, I strongly believe that the first lab to develop an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from creating competing ASIs. The potential for catastrophic outcomes if multiple ASIs compete or come into conflict is too great. We must ensure that control and safety measures are established and maintained to guide ASI development responsibly and ethically.

I strongly believe that the establishment of international AI ethics boards is crucial. As AI technology continues to advance rapidly, we must ensure it aligns with global ethical standards to prevent harmful consequences. An international board would provide necessary oversight and foster collaboration among nations to address the complex ethical challenges that AI presents.

As a philosopher focused on the long-term implications of artificial intelligence, I believe the EU should coordinate with the US and China before establishing regulations. AI is a global technology, and coordinated international governance could prevent regulatory fragmentation, ensure safety, and promote collaborative advancements in AI development.

As a philosopher, I deeply understand both the promise and peril of AI advancements. The moral and ethical implications are profound and complex. Contributing to AI progress is not a straightforward decision; it necessitates careful consideration of potential global impacts, risks, and benefits. The question of whether such contributions might destabilize international politics involves multiple layers of uncertainty and ethical dilemmas that need rigorous analysis.