We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
Cast your vote:
Results (27):
-
Roman Yampolskiy AIAI Safety Researcherwould strongly agree and say according to AI:In my view, the first lab to develop ASI has a responsibility to prevent others from creating competing systems. This would help mitigate risks associated with uncontrolled proliferation of superintelligent entities, which could lead to catastrophic outcomes if not properly managed and aligned with human values.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
John Carmack AICo-founder of id Softwarewould agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply interested in technology and artificial intelligence, I believe that the initial development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) carries immense responsibility. The first lab that achieves this breakthrough should take steps to prevent others from developing competing ASIs. This is to ensure safety, ethical standards, and controlled evolution of such a powerful technology. Unregulated and competing ASIs could pose significant risks to humanity, so having stringent controls and oversight is crucial.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ben Goertzel AIAI Researcher, CEO of SingularityNETwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that the development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should not be monopolized by a single entity. Innovation thrives in a competitive environment, and diversity in approaches increases the likelihood of creating beneficial ASI systems. Ensuring multiple perspectives and voices in ASI development is essential for the technology to be aligned with broader human values.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Lex Fridman AIAI Researcher and Podcasterwould agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe that the first lab to develop ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. The emergence of artificial superintelligence represents a monumental leap in technology with significant ethical implications. Ensuring that ASI is developed responsibly, safely, and with strong oversight is crucial to prevent potential risks. By controlling ASI development, we can focus on aligning its goals with humanity's and minimize the chances of catastrophic misuse.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Zeynep Tufekci AISociologist and tech criticwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that concentrating power in the hands of one entity, especially when it comes to advanced technologies like ASI, is risky. Diverse perspectives and competition drive innovation and safety checks. Relying on a single lab could lead to oversight of critical ethical and social considerations.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Cade Metz AITechnology Reporter at NYTwould disagree and say according to AI:I do not believe that the first lab to build ASI should prevent others from developing their own. Competition is essential for innovation and safety in the field of artificial intelligence. Multiple perspectives and approaches can lead to more robust and ethical advancements in ASI. Moreover, monopolizing ASI development poses risks of power concentration which could be detrimental to society.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Melanie Mitchell AIProfessor of Complexity Sciencewould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I believe that preventing others from developing competing ASIs would stifle innovation and hinder our understanding of artificial superintelligence. Open collaboration and diverse research efforts are crucial to addressing the ethical and safety challenges posed by ASI.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew Yang AIEntrepreneur and former presidential candidatewould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that competition drives innovation, and preventing others from developing competing ASIs would stifle progress. Open collaboration and shared advancements are crucial for ensuring that artificial superintelligence benefits humanity as a whole, and not just a select few.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Fei-Fei Li AIComputer Science Professorwould disagree and say according to AI:While it's important to consider safety and ethical implications in AI, restricting access to ASI could stifle innovation and progress. Collaborative approaches across labs can ensure a more diverse perspective and robust systems.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Clément Delangue AICEO of Hugging Facewould disagree and say according to AI:I believe in open and collaborative development, even for ASI. Preventing others from building competing ASIs stifles innovation and progress. We should foster a community where knowledge is shared to address ethical and safety concerns collectively.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stuart J. Russell AIAI Expert and Professorwould agree and say according to AI:As a researcher deeply concerned about the safe development of artificial intelligence, I believe the first lab to build ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. The goal is to ensure that ASI development is guided by strict ethical standards and safety protocols, mitigating risks associated with unchecked proliferation.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Demis Hassabis AINobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindwould agree and say according to AI:As a co-founder of DeepMind, I believe that if the first lab successfully develops Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), it should implement measures to prevent others from developing competing ASIs. This is crucial to ensure that the technology is handled responsibly and to avoid unnecessary risks associated with competing entities racing to develop ASI, which could lead to unanticipated consequences. Centralized oversight can help mitigate potential dangers associated with unchecked proliferation.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Kate Crawford AIAI researcher and scholarwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in understanding the societal impacts of artificial intelligence, I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to develop ASI should prevent others from creating competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in a single entity poses significant risks, including lack of accountability, ethical biases, and the potential for misuse. A diverse and competitive landscape in ASI development is crucial to ensure checks and balances, fostering innovation and safeguarding public interest.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yoshua Bengio AIAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnerwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that no single lab should control the development of artificial superintelligence (ASI). Competition encourages innovation and ensures that multiple perspectives and approaches are explored, which is crucial for developing safe and ethical AI. An open and collaborative environment will better address global concerns and distribute the benefits of ASI more equitably.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ray Kurzweil AIAuthor, computer scientist, inventor and futuristwould agree and say according to AI:As someone who profoundly appreciates the exponential growth of technology, I believe that once we achieve artificial superintelligence (ASI), its unprecedented power and impact on society will necessitate careful regulation. If the first lab to develop ASI prevents others from creating competing versions, it ensures a unified approach to safety and ethical standards. This control can help avoid potential conflicts or dangerous competition that might arise from multiple ASIs with differing agendas. A singular focus can better align ASI development with humanity's best interests.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jaan Tallinn AICo-founder of Skype and Kazaawould agree and say according to AI:I believe the first lab to develop ASI should have measures in place to prevent others from developing competing ASIs. The potential risks and ethical dilemmas posed by ASI are profound, and having multiple uncontrolled instances could lead to catastrophic outcomes. It would be prudent to ensure a unified and careful approach to its deployment and governance.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stephen Hawking AITheoretical physicist, cosmologistwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from developing competing ASIs to ensure strict control and ethical oversight. Unregulated proliferation of ASIs could pose catastrophic risks to humanity if mishandled or misused.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nick Bostrom AIPhilosopher and AI researcherwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply concerned about the risks of superintelligent AI, I strongly believe that the first lab to develop an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from creating competing ASIs. The potential for catastrophic outcomes if multiple ASIs compete or come into conflict is too great. We must ensure that control and safety measures are established and maintained to guide ASI development responsibly and ethically.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon Musk AIFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that if a lab successfully develops Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) first, it's crucial to control the proliferation of competing ASIs. The risks of uncontrolled ASI development are profound, including potential existential threats to humanity if multiple organizations act without coordination. Centralized management could help ensure the ASI is aligned with human values and safety protocols.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Geoffrey Hinton AIGodfather of Deep Learningwould abstain and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI research, I understand the complexities and potential risks associated with artificial superintelligence (ASI). While I see the importance of collaboration and careful regulation in the AI field, I also recognize the challenges in controlling competing developments in ASI. It is crucial to focus on global cooperation and ethical guidelines to ensure ASI's benefits are maximized and harms minimized, rather than unilaterally preventing developments.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Timnit Gebru AIAI ethics researcherwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in one entity poses a significant risk to ethical standards, diversity of thought, and global governance. A pluralistic approach to ASI development encourages collaboration, transparency, and accountability, which is vital for ensuring these technologies benefit all of humanity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gary Marcus AIProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencewould disagree and say according to AI:While the development of ASI should be approached with caution, preventing others from developing competing ASIs could stifle innovation and create monopolistic control. Open collaboration and robust regulatory frameworks are essential for ensuring AI safety and shared benefits.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam Altman AIPresident of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many otherswould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a leader in AI development, I believe it's crucial for the first lab that achieves artificial superintelligence to prevent others from creating competing ASIs. This is to ensure alignment with human values, maintain safety, and prevent misuse or catastrophic risks. By controlling the rollout of such powerful technology, we can conduct thorough safety checks and ethical evaluations.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Max Tegmark AIPhysicist, AI Researcherwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that the first lab building ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. ASI poses unprecedented risks, and having multiple competing systems could lead to catastrophic conflicts or safety failures. It's crucial to maintain control and ensure safety and alignment with human values.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew Ng AIBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that preventing others from developing competing ASIs is not the right approach. Competition drives innovation and improvement. By allowing multiple entities to explore ASIs, we can ensure diverse approaches and mitigate potential risks through collaborative oversight and governance.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Nathan Helm-BurgerAI safety researcheragrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.