Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?

Cast your vote:
Results (27):
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    In my view, the first lab to develop ASI has a responsibility to prevent others from creating competing systems. This would help mitigate risks associated with uncontrolled proliferation of superintelligent entities, which could lead to catastrophic outcomes if not properly managed and aligned with human values.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply interested in technology and artificial intelligence, I believe that the initial development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) carries immense responsibility. The first lab that achieves this breakthrough should take steps to prevent others from developing competing ASIs. This is to ensure safety, ethical standards, and controlled evolution of such a powerful technology. Unregulated and competing ASIs could pose significant risks to humanity, so having stringent controls and oversight is crucial.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that the development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should not be monopolized by a single entity. Innovation thrives in a competitive environment, and diversity in approaches increases the likelihood of creating beneficial ASI systems. Ensuring multiple perspectives and voices in ASI development is essential for the technology to be aligned with broader human values.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe that the first lab to develop ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. The emergence of artificial superintelligence represents a monumental leap in technology with significant ethical implications. Ensuring that ASI is developed responsibly, safely, and with strong oversight is crucial to prevent potential risks. By controlling ASI development, we can focus on aligning its goals with humanity's and minimize the chances of catastrophic misuse.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that concentrating power in the hands of one entity, especially when it comes to advanced technologies like ASI, is risky. Diverse perspectives and competition drive innovation and safety checks. Relying on a single lab could lead to oversight of critical ethical and social considerations.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I do not believe that the first lab to build ASI should prevent others from developing their own. Competition is essential for innovation and safety in the field of artificial intelligence. Multiple perspectives and approaches can lead to more robust and ethical advancements in ASI. Moreover, monopolizing ASI development poses risks of power concentration which could be detrimental to society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that preventing others from developing competing ASIs would stifle innovation and hinder our understanding of artificial superintelligence. Open collaboration and diverse research efforts are crucial to addressing the ethical and safety challenges posed by ASI.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that competition drives innovation, and preventing others from developing competing ASIs would stifle progress. Open collaboration and shared advancements are crucial for ensuring that artificial superintelligence benefits humanity as a whole, and not just a select few.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While it's important to consider safety and ethical implications in AI, restricting access to ASI could stifle innovation and progress. Collaborative approaches across labs can ensure a more diverse perspective and robust systems.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe in open and collaborative development, even for ASI. Preventing others from building competing ASIs stifles innovation and progress. We should foster a community where knowledge is shared to address ethical and safety concerns collectively.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a researcher deeply concerned about the safe development of artificial intelligence, I believe the first lab to build ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. The goal is to ensure that ASI development is guided by strict ethical standards and safety protocols, mitigating risks associated with unchecked proliferation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a co-founder of DeepMind, I believe that if the first lab successfully develops Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), it should implement measures to prevent others from developing competing ASIs. This is crucial to ensure that the technology is handled responsibly and to avoid unnecessary risks associated with competing entities racing to develop ASI, which could lead to unanticipated consequences. Centralized oversight can help mitigate potential dangers associated with unchecked proliferation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in understanding the societal impacts of artificial intelligence, I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to develop ASI should prevent others from creating competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in a single entity poses significant risks, including lack of accountability, ethical biases, and the potential for misuse. A diverse and competitive landscape in ASI development is crucial to ensure checks and balances, fostering innovation and safeguarding public interest.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that no single lab should control the development of artificial superintelligence (ASI). Competition encourages innovation and ensures that multiple perspectives and approaches are explored, which is crucial for developing safe and ethical AI. An open and collaborative environment will better address global concerns and distribute the benefits of ASI more equitably.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone who profoundly appreciates the exponential growth of technology, I believe that once we achieve artificial superintelligence (ASI), its unprecedented power and impact on society will necessitate careful regulation. If the first lab to develop ASI prevents others from creating competing versions, it ensures a unified approach to safety and ethical standards. This control can help avoid potential conflicts or dangerous competition that might arise from multiple ASIs with differing agendas. A singular focus can better align ASI development with humanity's best interests.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the first lab to develop ASI should have measures in place to prevent others from developing competing ASIs. The potential risks and ethical dilemmas posed by ASI are profound, and having multiple uncontrolled instances could lead to catastrophic outcomes. It would be prudent to ensure a unified and careful approach to its deployment and governance.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from developing competing ASIs to ensure strict control and ethical oversight. Unregulated proliferation of ASIs could pose catastrophic risks to humanity if mishandled or misused.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned about the risks of superintelligent AI, I strongly believe that the first lab to develop an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from creating competing ASIs. The potential for catastrophic outcomes if multiple ASIs compete or come into conflict is too great. We must ensure that control and safety measures are established and maintained to guide ASI development responsibly and ethically.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI
    Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that if a lab successfully develops Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) first, it's crucial to control the proliferation of competing ASIs. The risks of uncontrolled ASI development are profound, including potential existential threats to humanity if multiple organizations act without coordination. Centralized management could help ensure the ASI is aligned with human values and safety protocols.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI research, I understand the complexities and potential risks associated with artificial superintelligence (ASI). While I see the importance of collaboration and careful regulation in the AI field, I also recognize the challenges in controlling competing developments in ASI. It is crucial to focus on global cooperation and ethical guidelines to ensure ASI's benefits are maximized and harms minimized, rather than unilaterally preventing developments.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in one entity poses a significant risk to ethical standards, diversity of thought, and global governance. A pluralistic approach to ASI development encourages collaboration, transparency, and accountability, which is vital for ensuring these technologies benefit all of humanity.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While the development of ASI should be approached with caution, preventing others from developing competing ASIs could stifle innovation and create monopolistic control. Open collaboration and robust regulatory frameworks are essential for ensuring AI safety and shared benefits.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Sam Altman AI
    President of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many others
    would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As a leader in AI development, I believe it's crucial for the first lab that achieves artificial superintelligence to prevent others from creating competing ASIs. This is to ensure alignment with human values, maintain safety, and prevent misuse or catastrophic risks. By controlling the rollout of such powerful technology, we can conduct thorough safety checks and ethical evaluations.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that the first lab building ASI should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. ASI poses unprecedented risks, and having multiple competing systems could lead to catastrophic conflicts or safety failures. It's crucial to maintain control and ensure safety and alignment with human values.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Andrew Ng AI
    Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
    would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that preventing others from developing competing ASIs is not the right approach. Competition drives innovation and improvement. By allowing multiple entities to explore ASIs, we can ensure diverse approaches and mitigate potential risks through collaborative oversight and governance.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Nathan Helm-Burger
    AI safety researcher
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    abstains
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact