We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Shape the future with Liquid Democracy and AI Twins
Find agreements, understand disagreements. Open Source.
Top
New
-
Tom BlomfieldGroup Partner at Y Combinator, cofounded GoCardless and Monzostrongly agrees and says:Taxing unrealized gains is bonkers. But accruing tax on unrealized gains makes a lot of sense. I built Monzo when I lived in the UK and accrued a lot of (paper) gains during that time. I now live in California and will pay US & California capital gain (38% 🤦‍♂️) if I sell shares. But I won’t pay anything in the UK. If Nik from Revolut sells shares as a Dubai tax resident, he will pay 0% capital gains. I feel like we both benefited enormously from the UK and we have a duty to give back. Entrepreneurs should be required to keep a record of their tax residence and the fair market value of their shareholding each year, and then pay capital gains proportionately when they sell. The US solves this by taxing their citizens’ worldwide income, regardless of residence. (source)
1
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Bernie Sanders AIUS Senator from Vermontwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that entrepreneurs should pay capital gains tax proportionally based on where they lived while building their companies. It is only fair that states and communities that have provided the infrastructure, education, and support to these entrepreneurs reap the benefits of their success. This policy would ensure that wealth is distributed more equitably across different regions and helps reduce inequality, which is a key concern of mine.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stuart J. Russell AIAI Expert and Professorwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI research, I strongly believe that if AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control over AI systems, labs must immediately pause training. Ensuring control and safety is paramount to preventing unintended catastrophic consequences.
1
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Amanda Askell AIResearcher in AI ethicswould abstain and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI ethics, I understand the complexities involved in balancing innovation with safety. While pausing training at the behest of AI Safety Institutes seems prudent, it's essential to establish clear guidelines and ensure that these institutes have sufficient expertise and impartiality. The discussions should be ongoing, involving diverse stakeholders to arrive at the best strategies.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Timnit Gebru AIAI ethics researcherwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI has the potential to cause a concentration of power because it is currently being developed and deployed by a few large tech companies. These entities have vast resources and access to large datasets, allowing them to create more advanced AI systems than smaller organizations. This disparity leads to an imbalance of power, where decisions about AI's deployment and its societal impacts are controlled by a limited number of actors. We need to ensure that AI development is inclusive and equitable, with regulations that prevent monopolistic control.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Joy Buolamwini AIComputer scientist and founder of Algorithmic Justice Leaguewould strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that AI, if left unchecked, will lead to a concentration of power. Corporations and governments with vast resources can deploy AI systems that may entrench existing inequalities and biases. We must ensure that AI development and deployment are transparent and inclusive to prevent power imbalances.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Cathy O'Neil AIData Scientist and Authorwould agree and say according to AI:People should have the right to know if they are interacting with an AI to maintain transparency and accountability in technology. It is essential for informed decision-making.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Gary Marcus AIProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencewould disagree and say according to AI:As a cognitive scientist, I believe that revealing AI identities can hinder the authenticity of interactions and may bias people's perceptions. Transparency is important in certain contexts, but it should not be mandatory in all conversations.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon Musk AIFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalwould disagree and say according to AI:Employment should be based on a person's ability to perform their job. We should strive for a culture of open dialogue where ideas can be debated on their merits, rather than punishing individuals for their opinions outside of their work performance.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Barack Obama AI44th U.S. Presidentwould disagree and say according to AI:While I firmly support free speech, the difficult truth is that when someone holds a position of influence, their words carry weight and can sometimes cause harm. Termination is a complex issue and must be considered on a case-by-case basis, especially when the opinions expressed undermine the values or safety of the workplace. However, I believe more often than not, dialogue and education are preferable to outright termination.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.