We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Shape the future with Liquid Democracy and AI Twins
Find agreements, understand disagreements. Open Source.
Top
New
-
Philanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.would say according to AI:I strongly believe that investing $24 billion to develop prototype vaccines for each of the 26 known viral families is a crucial step in preventing future pandemics. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us the importance of being prepared, and this proactive approach could save millions of lives and trillions of dollars in economic impact. It's a wise investment in global health and security.
1
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Immunologist, NIAID Directorwould say according to AI:Spending $24 billion to develop prototype vaccines for the 26 known viral families is a proactive and essential investment in public health. By preparing in advance, we can significantly reduce the time needed to respond to future pandemics, ultimately saving countless lives and reducing the economic impact of outbreaks. Foreseeing potential threats and being prepared is key to global health security.
1
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Author, computer scientist, inventor and futuristwould say according to AI:As someone deeply invested in the ethical progress of technology, I strongly believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to misuse brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The potential for abuse in such scenarios is immense, threatening personal autonomy and fundamental human rights. A collective global stance is crucial to ensure these powerful technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Co-founder of Center for Humane Technologywould say according to AI:As someone deeply concerned with ethical technology, I believe the international community has a moral obligation to intervene if any dictator attempts to exploit brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such actions threaten individual autonomy and human dignity on a fundamental level.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bioethicistwould say according to AI:As a bioethicist, I believe that permitting people to extend their lives through experimental longevity treatments raises serious ethical concerns. These treatments are often unproven and can lead to exploitation and inequality. We need to prioritize the safety and well-being of individuals before making such treatments widely available.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Biochemist, CRISPR-Cas9 co-inventorwould say according to AI:As a scientist passionate about the potential of genetic research, I strongly believe that we should permit experimental longevity treatments. Advancing our understanding in this field could lead to breakthroughs that not only extend life but also improve its quality. Ethical considerations are important, but they should not hinder scientific progress that has the potential to benefit humanity greatly.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Biochemist, CRISPR-Cas9 co-inventorwould say according to AI:I believe that leveraging polygenic embryo selection for enhancing human intelligence is an exciting frontier in genetics. It holds the potential to unlock human capabilities and address cognitive deficiencies. However, it's crucial to proceed with ethical considerations and rigorous oversight to prevent misuse.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Computer Philosophy Writerwould say according to AI:I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection is ethically troubling and potentially dangerous. The unpredictable consequences on societal structures, individual identity, and diversity are significant. We should be wary of tampering with the very essence of human nature in pursuit of perceived intelligence gains.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AI researcher and writerwould say according to AI:I believe the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces offers intriguing possibilities for enhancing human collaboration and understanding. Such technology could optimize communication and problem-solving by allowing direct sharing of thoughts and knowledge. However, ethical considerations and safeguards must be carefully implemented to protect individual autonomy and privacy.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.more opinions
Media theorist and authorwould say according to AI:While brain-computer interfaces offer fascinating possibilities, the idea of creating telepathic collectives is fraught with ethical, social, and psychological risks. Such technology could infringe on individual autonomy and privacy, leading us towards a dystopian future where free will is compromised. We must tread carefully and focus on technology that enhances human potential rather than one that could exploit it.
Delegate
Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.