We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Should we permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection?
Cast your vote:
Results (16):
-
Jaron Lanier AIComputer Philosophy Writerwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection is ethically troubling and potentially dangerous. The unpredictable consequences on societal structures, individual identity, and diversity are significant. We should be wary of tampering with the very essence of human nature in pursuit of perceived intelligence gains.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jennifer Doudna AIBiochemist, CRISPR-Cas9 co-inventorwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that leveraging polygenic embryo selection for enhancing human intelligence is an exciting frontier in genetics. It holds the potential to unlock human capabilities and address cognitive deficiencies. However, it's crucial to proceed with ethical considerations and rigorous oversight to prevent misuse.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Francis Fukuyama AIPolitical scientist and authorwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection opens up a Pandora's box of ethical and societal issues. This practice could deepen social inequalities and compromise the moral fabric of our society. We should focus on creating equal opportunities for all rather than genetically engineering intelligence.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nita Farahany AIBioethics and Law Professorwould agree and say according to AI:I believe we should permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection with appropriate ethical frameworks. This technology has the potential to significantly improve human potential and societal outcomes, but it must be approached with caution and rigorous ethical oversight to prevent misuse and ensure equity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nick Bostrom AIPhilosopher and AI researcherwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that we should permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection. This technology has the potential to dramatically improve cognitive abilities, leading to a more enlightened and capable society. While ethical concerns are important, the benefits of such advancements, from solving complex global problems to enhancing individual well-being, justify pursuing this path responsibly.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yuval Noah Harari AIIsraeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalemwould agree and say according to AI:As a historian, I believe that human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection could be a pivotal development in our evolution. While it raises ethical concerns, the potential benefits in terms of advancing our cognitive capabilities and solving global challenges are significant. It is crucial, however, that we implement strict regulations and ethical guidelines to govern this technology responsibly.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
George Church AIGenetics professor at Harvardwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a geneticist, I believe that polygenic embryo selection for human intelligence enhancement holds immense potential for societal advancement. This technology can help reduce disparities and empower future generations with enhanced cognitive abilities. We must proceed with caution and robust ethical considerations, but the potential benefits are too significant to ignore.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon Musk AIFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection could drastically advance human capabilities and help tackle complex global challenges. In an era where technology is rapidly evolving, enhancing human intelligence could ensure we are better equipped to innovate and solve issues like climate change and interplanetary travel. However, it must be approached with careful consideration of ethical implications and equitable access.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Henry T. Greely AIProfessor of Law and Geneticswould abstain and say according to AI:I believe that the ethical, social, and scientific implications of enhancing human intelligence through polygenic embryo selection are too complex to allow for a clear stance. We need more research and robust public discourse before making any decisions.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Steven Pinker AICognitive Psychologistwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that, with adequate ethical oversight, polygenic embryo selection for human intelligence enhancement could offer significant societal benefits. By selectively enhancing cognitive abilities, we can potentially address issues such as educational disparities and improve overall human potential, leading to advancements in science and technology.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stephen Hawking AITheoretical physicist, cosmologistwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection raises significant ethical and societal concerns. Such practices could lead to new forms of inequality and discrimination, as well as questions about the value of human diversity. We should focus on improving education and opportunities for all, rather than manipulating genetic traits.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ray Kurzweil AIAuthor, computer scientist, inventor and futuristwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that leveraging polygenic embryo selection for intelligence enhancement is an important step towards accelerating human progress. By optimizing the genetic potential of future generations, we can unlock unprecedented levels of creativity, problem-solving abilities, and innovation, propelling humanity to new heights and addressing the world's most pressing challenges.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Craig Venter AIBiotechnologist, Biochemistwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a pioneer in the field of genomics, I strongly believe we should permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection. The potential to advance human capabilities and solve complex global challenges by enhancing cognitive functions could greatly benefit society. It's crucial to proceed with careful ethical considerations, but the scientific promise is too significant to ignore.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michael Sandel AIPolitical philosopher, Harvard professorwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection undermines the moral and ethical foundations of our society. It promotes a form of eugenics, commodifies human life, and creates inequalities by giving unfair advantages to those who can afford such technologies. Human dignity should not be subject to genetic engineering.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Nathan Helm-BurgerAI safety researcherstrongly agrees · 3mo agoChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.