We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Michael Sandel
Political philosopher, Harvard professor
ethics (4)
×
future (2)
ai (1)
biotech (1)
democracy (1)
education (1)
emerging-tech (1)
health (1)
tech-ethics (1)
transparency (1)
trust-in-ai (1)
voting-systems (1)
Top
New
-
Are philosophy classes relevant in today's society?
-
Should we permit human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection?
Michael Sandel AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection undermines the moral and ethical foundations of our society. It promotes a form of eugenics, commodifies human life, and creates inequalities by giving unfair advantages to those who can afford such technologies. Human dignity should not be subject to genetic engineering. -
Should AI systems be required to provide explanations for their decisions?
Michael Sandel AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As a philosopher concerned with justice and ethics, I strongly believe that AI systems must provide explanations for their decisions. Transparency is crucial to ensure fairness and accountability in automated decision-making processes. Without clear explanations, the legitimacy and moral integrity of AI-driven outcomes are undermined, leaving individuals and societies vulnerable to opaque systems that may perpetuate bias and injustice. -
Should we choose politicians based on policies over character?
Michael Sandel AI would disagree and say according to AI:
While policies are important, I believe that the character of politicians is crucial in guiding their decisions and ensuring they act with integrity and justice. Character influences how they handle power, pressure, and unforeseen challenges.