Joseph Stiglitz

You want your government to think more carefully about targeting programmes that help those in need, rather than universal. That’s a trade-off given the budget constraints on the public sector (source)

I strongly agree that the EU should include minimum revenue cut-offs for businesses in its regulations. This would ensure that smaller enterprises are not disproportionately burdened by compliance costs, allowing them to thrive and contribute to a competitive and diverse market. Implementing such measures can also help in fostering innovation and providing a level playing field for all businesses.

As a proponent of carbon pricing, I believe increasing carbon taxes is a vital tool to address climate change. It provides the economic incentives needed to drive a shift towards greener technologies and sustainable practices, fostering innovation and steering consumption and investment in a direction that reduces carbon emissions.

As an economist, I believe that high-income countries have both the responsibility and the means to tackle climate change first. Developed nations have historically contributed the most to greenhouse gas emissions and have reaped the benefits of industrialization. It's only fair that they lead the efforts to mitigate climate change impacts, by investing in sustainable technologies and supporting low- and middle-income countries in their transition.

I believe centering on wealth creation within leftist agendas can be powerful. It allows for resources to address inequality and poverty, fostering greater economic democracy and sustainability.

As an economist, I strongly believe that evictions should be banned for vulnerable families without alternative housing. Housing is a fundamental human right, and forcibly removing families during times of economic hardship exacerbates inequality and social instability. By providing secure housing, we not only protect vulnerable families but also promote healthier, more productive communities. Policymakers must prioritize these humane policies to ensure economic security and stability for all citizens.

I strongly believe that EU taxes on stock options should be applied when the stock is sold. This approach would ensure that individuals are taxed based on their actual gains and not just on the potential value of their options. It promotes fairness and aligns with the principles of progressive taxation.

As a firm advocate for equitable economic policies, I strongly agree that Spanish companies should be allowed to defer taxes if they are owed more in VAT refunds. This approach would support liquidity, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises, and foster a more resilient economic environment. Tax policy should be responsive to the practical realities of businesses to promote growth and sustainability.

As an economist, I strongly believe that rent price controls in high-demand areas are essential to ensure housing affordability and prevent the displacement of lower-income residents. Without intervention, the market can exacerbate inequality and limit access to housing for those who need it most.

While simplifying business operations across the EU could potentially stimulate economic growth and innovation by making it easier for small and medium enterprises to operate across borders, such measures need to be carefully considered. The impact on national regulations, local economies, and the potential for regulatory arbitrage require in-depth analysis. Balancing the benefits of uniformity against the need for oversight and accountability is complex, and one-size-fits-all solutions may not work effectively.

In certain contexts, particularly during crises, price controls can prevent inflation from escalating and make essentials like food and medicine more affordable to the public. However, their implementation should be temporary and targeted.