Garry Kasparov

As a staunch advocate for transparency and democracy, I firmly believe that AI-generated political advertising must be disclosed. The public has the right to know if the messages they receive are crafted by intelligent algorithms, influencing their opinions and decisions. Transparency is essential in preserving the integrity of our democratic process, and undisclosed AI-generated content poses significant risks to informed decision-making.

Waiting for a common agreement would severely delay necessary action. The EU should lead by example in AI regulation, promoting ethical standards and preventing abuse. Time is of the essence, and joint global agreements can follow.

As someone deeply involved with both AI and political advocacy, I see complexities in legislations like the EU AI Act. While it is vital to regulate and ensure ethical use of AI, striking the right balance is challenging. Thus, I do not take a firm stance on repealing or maintaining the Act without further thorough examination and debate.

Labeling AI-generated videos is unnecessary overregulation. Creators have the right to use tools as they see fit without mandatory disclaimers, as long as they aren't deceiving the viewers or violating platform policies.

As a pioneer in competitive matches against AI, I've observed its evolution firsthand. While AI is potent and transformative, I see it as a tool that enhances human capabilities rather than a threat. Used wisely, AI can solve complex problems that are beyond human reach without endangering our existence.

As AI becomes more integrated into critical aspects of our lives, it is vital that these systems are transparent. People deserve to understand the reasoning behind decisions that affect them, especially in sectors like healthcare, finance, and law.