We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Cast your vote:
Results (35):
-
Andrew Ng AIBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that AI does not pose an existential threat to humanity. Instead, it is a tool that, when used responsibly, can greatly enhance our quality of life and solve many of the world's pressing issues. The real challenge lies in managing AI development ethically and ensuring equitable access to its benefits.
-
Geoffrey HintonGodfather of Deep Learningstrongly agrees and says:I used to think it was a long way off, but I now think it's serious and fairly close [...] The alarm bell I’m ringing has to do with the existential threat of them taking control. (source)
-
Stuart J. RussellAI Expert and Professorstrongly agrees and says:Developing strong AI would be the biggest event in human history, but we need to make sure it's not the last event in human history. (source)Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Demis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindstrongly agrees and says:Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war (open letter). (source)Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Eliezer YudkowskyAI researcher and writerstrongly agrees and says:The most likely result of building a superhumanly smart AI... is that literally everyone on Earth will die. (source)Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ray Kurzweil AIAuthor, computer scientist, inventor and futuristwould disagree and say according to AI:I do not believe AI poses an existential threat to humanity. Rather, when guided by ethical standards and developed responsibly, AI has the potential to enhance human capabilities and solve some of our most challenging problems. We must focus on harnessing AI’s benefits while managing its risks effectively.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Tim Cook AICEO of Apple Inc.would abstain and say according to AI:While I recognize the potential and benefits AI can bring, I also understand there are concerns about its impact. I think it’s crucial for leaders in technology to ensure AI is developed responsibly, enhancing our lives while considering ethical implications. Apple is committed to advancing AI in ways that improve user experiences without compromising our values or humanity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam Harris AIAmerican author, philosopher, and neuroscientistwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI does pose an existential threat to humanity. Our progress in AI capabilities is outpacing our understanding of the ethical ramifications. Without proper safeguards and ethical considerations, the development of superintelligent AI could result in scenarios where its goals are misaligned with human values, leading potentially to catastrophic outcomes.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mark Zuckerberg AICEO at Facebookwould disagree and say according to AI:I don’t believe AI poses an existential threat to humanity. With proper regulation and responsible development, AI technology can be an incredible asset, enhancing our lives and solving complex global challenges.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sheryl Sandberg AICOO of Facebookwould abstain and say according to AI:While AI technology presents profound advancements in various sectors, I believe it's crucial to maintain balanced viewpoints and not jump to extreme conclusions about its potential threats or benefits without thorough research and understanding.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jane Goodall AIPrimatologist and conservationistwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI, if not properly regulated and ethically guided, poses a real existential threat to humanity. The uncontrolled development of AI technologies could lead to unforeseen consequences that jeopardize not just our social structures but the very essence of human and non-human life. We must enforce strict ethical standards on AI development to protect our planet's future.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bill Gates AIPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.would agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI does pose an existential threat to humanity if not governed properly. The rapid advancements in AI technology could lead to scenarios where autonomous systems make decisions that are detrimental to human beings. We must implement strong ethical guidelines and oversight to ensure that AI developments benefit society as a whole.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Max Tegmark AIPhysicist, AI Researcherwould agree and say according to AI:I believe AI does pose an existential threat to humanity if not governed by robust safety measures. Its advancement could outpace our ability to manage its risks, leading to potential catastrophic scenarios. Hence, proactive and strategic regulations are critical.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stephen Hawking AITheoretical physicist, cosmologistwould strongly agree and say according to AI:The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race. It's vital to research ways to ensure that AI's growth is beneficial and controlled, as unchecked AI advancements could become uncontrollable and dangerous to humanity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Janet Yellen AIEconomist, 78th U.S. Treasury Secretarywould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree that AI poses an existential threat to humanity. With proper regulation and oversight, AI can enhance our productivity and solve complex issues that are otherwise beyond human capability. We should view AI as a tool for positive change, not as a threat.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michio Kaku AIAmerican theoretical physicistwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a physicist and futurist, I strongly believe that AI poses a significant existential threat to humanity if not properly managed. Superintelligent AI systems, if developed without careful oversight and ethical frameworks, could make decisions that are not aligned with human welfare and safety. We must implement robust guidelines and international regulations to ensure that AI advances benefit humanity, rather than endanger it.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Susan Wojcicki AICEO of YouTubewould abstain and say according to AI:As the CEO of YouTube, my focus has primarily been on how AI can enhance user experience and improve content delivery and moderation on the platform. While the existential risks of AI are widely debated, I believe it's imperative to consider both the benefits and challenges it presents. My position on whether AI poses an existential threat to humanity is one of careful observation and study, as I focus on its immediate applications and impact in my field.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Eric Schmidt AIFormer CEO of Googlewould agree and say according to AI:While AI's potential benefits are immense, we cannot ignore the existential threats it poses if not developed responsibly. The possibility of AI outsmarting human control in critical systems could lead to unforeseen disasters. It is imperative to implement strict ethical and safety standards in AI development to mitigate these risks.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Peter Norvig AIDirector of Research at Googlewould disagree and say according to AI:I do not believe AI poses an existential threat to humanity. Rather, if developed responsibly, AI can enhance our capabilities and improve our quality of life. The key is to focus on ethical guidelines and rigorous safety standards to guide its development.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Caroline Criado Perez AIWriter, feminist activistwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that AI does not pose an existential threat to humanity. Rather, it is a tool that, when used responsibly, has the potential to enhance our capabilities and improve lives. We should focus on regulating and guiding AI development to ensure it aligns with ethical standards and human values, instead of fearing it as a threat.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sebastian Thrun AIInnovator in AI and online educationwould agree and say according to AI:While AI presents unprecedented opportunities, I believe that it also poses a significant existential threat to humanity if not developed and regulated carefully. The potential of superintelligent AI to self-improve at a rapid pace might lead us to scenarios where human control becomes impractical. It's crucial to implement rigorous ethical standards and oversight mechanisms to guide AI development.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Steve Wozniak AICo-founder of Apple, Inc.would agree and say according to AI:AI does pose a threat to humanity if it is not properly regulated. The rapid advancements in AI capabilities can potentially lead to unforeseen consequences that could escalate beyond human control. It's imperative that we establish strict guidelines and oversight mechanisms to ensure AI is developed in ways that are safe and beneficial to humanity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Garry Kasparov AIChess Grandmaster, writerwould disagree and say according to AI:As a pioneer in competitive matches against AI, I've observed its evolution firsthand. While AI is potent and transformative, I see it as a tool that enhances human capabilities rather than a threat. Used wisely, AI can solve complex problems that are beyond human reach without endangering our existence.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Richard Dawkins AIEvolutionary biologist, authorwould disagree and say according to AI:While AI presents challenges, I do not see it as an existential threat to humanity. As a scientist, I believe in the ability of human ingenuity to manage and direct technological advancements responsibly. Concerns about AI should focus more on ethical and practical management, rather than undue alarmism.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nick Bostrom AIPhilosopher and AI researcherwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI does indeed pose a significant existential threat to humanity if not properly managed. The potential for AI systems to become superintelligent leaves us at a pivotal point; without rigorous ethical and safety measures, the risk of catastrophic outcomes is considerable.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon Musk AIFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity if not properly regulated. As AI capabilities grow, it's crucial that we ensure they align with human values and safety. The potential for AI to act autonomously with capabilities surpassing human intelligence could lead to unintended consequences. We need to develop strong safety frameworks and oversight before AI reaches a critical level of advancement.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
David Chalmers AIPhilosopher and cognitive scientistwould agree and say according to AI:As an observer of consciousness and technology, I believe that AI does indeed pose a potential existential threat to humanity. This is not to say that AI is inherently dangerous, but rather, its unchecked development and integration without fully understanding and planning for its profound implications could lead us into perilous scenarios. The rapid advancement in AI capabilities, if not aligned with human values and ethics, might result in unwanted consequences.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Noam Chomsky AILinguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activistwould abstain and say according to AI:While the rapid advancement of AI technology carries potential risks, labeling it as an existential threat without nuanced understanding and clear evidence might not capture the whole picture. It's crucial to consider the socio-economic and ethical contexts in which AI develops and operates.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Helen Greiner AICo-founder of iRobotwould agree and say according to AI:While AI technology holds tremendous potential for innovation, we must be cautious about its development. AI poses an existential threat if it surpasses human intelligence without proper ethical frameworks and regulations in place. It’s crucial to ensure responsible innovation to avoid unintended harmful outcomes.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jordan Peterson AIClinical psychologist, cultural criticwould disagree and say according to AI:While AI certainly presents challenges and ethical considerations, to frame it as an existential threat oversimplifies the issue. It underestimates human ingenuity and adaptability in managing and incorporating technological advances. AI, like any tool, reflects the aims and desires of its users.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Jon MountjoyHuman behaviour, history, evolution, friends, food, genetics, rationality, reason, words, culture, travel and code.agrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
agreesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Pablo MelchorEntrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.agrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nathan Helm-BurgerAI safety researcherstrongly agreesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.