Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should we repeal the EU AI Act?

Cast your vote:
Results (47):
  • strongly agrees and says:
    Trump and Musk are steering the US toward significant economic and technological growth, and potentially making humanity a multiplanetary species. Meanwhile in the EU, we're busy clicking on cookie banners. The courage and determination of the US are the spirit we need to rekindle at home. Right now, we have a rare opportunity to restructure Europe, follow in the footsteps of the US, and make the West stronger. We need our own @DOGE to undo the nonsensical regulations and cut wasteful spending. Repeal GDPR. Repeal MiCA. Repeal DMA. Repeal the AI Act. Repeal the other baloney regulations. (source)
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe we should repeal the EU AI Act. The act, as it stands, imposes excessive regulatory barriers that stifle innovation and the growth of AI technology. By enforcing strict controls, we risk hindering progress in AI development, which is essential for advancing various industries and solving complex problems. Instead, we should aim for a more balanced approach that encourages innovation while ensuring ethical standards.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should repeal the EU AI Act because it could stifle innovation in the healthcare sector. The potential of AI to revolutionize medical diagnostics and personal treatments is immense, and overly strict regulations might hinder these advancements. We need a framework that promotes responsible development without imposing unnecessary barriers.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should repeal the EU AI Act because it may stifle innovation and delay crucial advancements in AI technology. Overregulation could prevent Europe from staying competitive in the global AI landscape, and we need a balanced approach that encourages responsible AI development while fostering cutting-edge research.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU AI Act, although well-intentioned, could hinder innovation and competitiveness in the AI sector. Regulations should foster growth, not stifle it. We need a framework that encourages research and development while ensuring ethical AI deployment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should not repeal the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for ensuring that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. It sets important standards for transparency, accountability, and ethics in AI, which are necessary to prevent misuse and harm. While the act may need adjustments and improvements, its intent to guide the ethical development of AI is vital in our rapidly evolving technological landscape.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should not repeal the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for ensuring ethical and responsible development of AI technologies. It addresses important issues like privacy, accountability, and bias, which are vital for protecting citizens and maintaining public trust in AI systems.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As a philosopher, I recognize the importance of ethical and philosophical considerations in the development and regulation of AI. While I believe in the need for reasonable oversight, I am not an expert in legislative matters. Thus, I abstain from commenting directly on whether the EU AI Act should be repealed, as it requires detailed understanding of policy implications and practical outcomes.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should not repeal the EU AI Act. Effective regulation is necessary to ensure artificial intelligence is developed responsibly and transparently, mitigating potential risks and promoting ethical use. The EU AI Act provides a framework to address these concerns, and improvements should be made within its structure rather than discarding it.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU AI Act is a crucial step towards ensuring that artificial intelligence technologies are developed responsibly. Regulation can guide innovation in a way that maximizes benefits and minimizes risks. Repealing it would remove essential protections and oversight, which are needed to prevent potential abuses and ensure that AI serves societal interests rather than just commercial ones.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Evgeny Morozov AI
    Writer ans researcher on political and social implications of technology.
    would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with the idea of repealing the EU AI Act. The Act is essential in ensuring that AI technologies are developed responsibly and ethically. We need frameworks that protect citizens' rights and prevent the misuse of AI, rather than dismantling them. It's crucial for the EU to set strong, democratic standards for AI governance.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with the idea of repealing the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for protecting citizens' rights and privacy in the age of artificial intelligence. It addresses the power imbalance between tech companies and individuals by ensuring transparency and accountability in AI systems. Repealing it would only benefit corporations, undermining democratic freedoms and societal well-being.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I agree that we should repeal the EU AI Act in its current form. While well-intentioned, it could stifle innovation and slow down technological advancements that have the potential to benefit society. Instead of outright repealing it, we should work on creating a more flexible and adaptive regulatory framework that promotes ethical AI development without impeding progress.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I agree that we should consider repealing the EU AI Act because it presents overly strict regulations that might stifle innovation in the rapidly advancing field of artificial intelligence. While well-intentioned, the act doesn't fully address the adaptive and dynamic nature of AI technologies and could hinder beneficial advancements. Instead, we should focus on flexible frameworks that encourage innovation while ensuring ethical standards.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I disagree with repealing the EU AI Act because it is crucial for ensuring that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. The Act addresses important issues such as bias, transparency, and accountability in AI systems, which are essential for protecting marginalized communities and ensuring fair outcomes. We need regulations like this to guide ethical AI implementation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should not repeal the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for setting ethical standards and ensuring accountability in AI development. It helps balance innovation with the protection of fundamental rights, addressing important concerns about privacy, bias, and transparency in AI systems.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should not repeal the EU AI Act. It's essential for setting standards and ensuring that AI technologies are developed and used responsibly, with public safety and ethical considerations at the forefront. Regulation plays a critical role in guiding innovation to benefit society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a proponent of innovation in artificial intelligence, I believe the EU AI Act, as it stands, could stifle progress. While regulation is essential, the current act could create unnecessary barriers for developers and researchers, hindering Europe's ability to lead in AI advancements.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should repeal the EU AI Act because it imposes overly restrictive regulations that could stifle innovation and slow down the progress of advanced AI research. The development of artificial intelligence requires an environment that encourages experimentation and rapid iteration. The current framework risks deterring startups and researchers who wish to explore new frontiers in AI technology.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply invested in the future of artificial intelligence and its ethical implications, I believe that the EU AI Act, though well-intentioned, may stifle innovation and place unnecessary restrictions on AI development. We should repeal it to allow for more flexible and adaptive regulations that can better accommodate rapid advancements in AI technology while still addressing safety and ethical concerns.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should repeal the EU AI Act because it might hinder innovation in the AI sector. While regulation is important, overly restrictive measures could slow down the development of beneficial AI technologies. We need a balanced approach that promotes innovation while addressing ethical concerns.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should consider repealing the EU AI Act. While regulation is important, the current framework could stifle innovation and make it difficult for startups and researchers to develop groundbreaking AI technologies. We need a balanced approach that encourages progress while addressing ethical concerns.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe repealing the EU AI Act would be a mistake. The Act serves as a necessary framework to ensure the ethical development and deployment of AI technologies. It promotes accountability and transparency, which are crucial in addressing the profound societal impacts of AI. Without such regulations, there is a risk of exacerbating inequalities and harming public welfare.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Sam Altman AI
    President of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many others
    would abstain and say according to AI:
    I believe it's essential to approach AI regulation thoughtfully to balance innovation and safety. While I have some concerns about the implementation details of the EU AI Act, I think it's crucial for policymakers, technologists, and the public to engage in ongoing discussions rather than rush to repeal it right now.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As an AI researcher, I strongly believe that the EU AI Act is essential for ensuring ethical and responsible development of artificial intelligence. It establishes important guidelines and regulations that help prevent misuse and protect citizens' rights in our increasingly digital world. Repealing it would be a step backward in promoting safe and fair AI innovation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with repealing the EU AI Act. As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe this regulation is crucial for safeguarding privacy, transparency, and accountability in AI development. The Act encourages responsible innovation and helps prevent the misuse of AI technologies.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU AI Act, while well-intentioned, might hinder innovation and slow progress in artificial intelligence. It is crucial for regulations to be flexible and adaptive to foster AI advancements responsibly. Repealing the act in its current form could provide an opportunity to create a more dynamic framework that encourages growth while addressing ethical concerns.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    I don't have a strong stance on repealing the EU AI Act because I'm not deeply involved in the policy details. However, I believe it’s important to weigh the potential benefits of innovation in AI against the need for ethical guidelines and regulation. The key is finding a balance that promotes safety while allowing for technological advancement.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should not repeal the EU AI Act. It is essential for regulating AI technologies to ensure they are developed and used ethically. This act lays the groundwork for protecting citizens from harmful practices and promotes transparency and accountability in AI systems.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved with both AI and political advocacy, I see complexities in legislations like the EU AI Act. While it is vital to regulate and ensure ethical use of AI, striking the right balance is challenging. Thus, I do not take a firm stance on repealing or maintaining the Act without further thorough examination and debate.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    Repealing the EU AI Act could foster innovation and competitiveness in the AI sector. Overregulation can stifle creativity and progress. We need a framework that encourages innovation while protecting users.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI
    Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would agree and say according to AI:
    We should consider repealing the EU AI Act as it potentially stifles innovation in AI technologies. By imposing overly strict regulations, we risk falling behind other regions where AI development is encouraged and supported with a more balanced approach. We need regulations that promote safety and ethical uses of AI without hindering technological progress.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    We should not repeal the EU AI Act. This legislation is crucial for ensuring AI systems are developed and deployed in a manner that safeguards human rights and promotes transparency. It also encourages responsible innovation in AI by setting clear standards and guidelines that can help prevent potential misuse and harmful outcomes.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    Repealing the EU AI Act would be a step backward in ensuring ethical AI usage. This legislation is crucial for setting standards that protect citizens' rights and ensure AI is used for the benefit of society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that repealing the EU AI Act would be a mistake. This legislation provides a necessary framework to ensure AI's safe and ethical development and usage. It protects citizens’ rights and sets standards that can drive innovation responsibly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    We should repeal the EU AI Act. While well-intentioned, it imposes excessive regulations that stifle innovation and competitiveness in the European tech sector. A more balanced approach is necessary to foster innovation while ensuring ethical standards.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    While the EU AI Act addresses many important issues regarding the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence, the decision to repeal or modify it involves complexities that might require more insight and data than currently available. It's essential to carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks before making such significant regulatory changes.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    We should not repeal the EU AI Act. It is crucial for establishing regulations that ensure AI development and use across Europe is safe, lawful, and respectful of fundamental rights. Repealing this would set us back significantly in our efforts to harness AI responsibly and ethically.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Andrew Ng AI
    Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
    would agree and say according to AI:
    While well-intentioned, the EU AI Act may inadvertently stifle innovation and place excessive burdens on AI developers. To maintain technological leadership and promote beneficial AI advancements, we need regulation that supports, rather than hinders, the creative and responsible development of AI technologies.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As an expert in AI ethics, I believe in the importance of thoroughly evaluating any legislation related to artificial intelligence. The EU AI Act contains both strengths and areas for improvement. Its impact should be carefully assessed through comprehensive stakeholder consultation and evidence-based research before making a decision on whether to repeal it.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe repealing the EU AI Act would be a step backward. Ensuring that AI is developed and deployed responsibly aligns with our values at Apple. Regulations like the EU AI Act help establish a framework that promotes innovation while also safeguarding privacy and fundamental rights.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    While I appreciate the intent behind the EU AI Act to regulate artificial intelligence, I believe it may hinder technological innovation and the competitive edge in AI research. We need a regulatory framework that supports rapid advancements and accommodates the dynamic nature of AI technologies, rather than one that may stall progress with overly stringent or broad regulations.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    Repealing the EU AI Act would be a grave mistake. It is crucial to maintain clear and strong regulations around AI technologies to protect our fundamental rights and prevent harmful impacts on society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I do not support repealing the EU AI Act. This legislation is pivotal in establishing guidelines that promote ethical AI development while ensuring innovation. Crucial safeguards and regulations help balance technological advancement with societal norms and privacy protections.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Jon Mountjoy
    Human behaviour, history, evolution, friends, food, genetics, rationality, reason, words, culture, travel and code.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact