Andrew Ng

While well-intentioned, the EU AI Act may inadvertently stifle innovation and place excessive burdens on AI developers. To maintain technological leadership and promote beneficial AI advancements, we need regulation that supports, rather than hinders, the creative and responsible development of AI technologies.

While I acknowledge the potential benefits and risks of emotion-detecting AI, I believe we need more research and dialogue before deciding on regulations. Understanding its impact fully is crucial.

I believe the EU should not delay regulating AI while waiting for a common agreement with the US and China. Each region has unique needs and challenges, and timely regulations can foster innovation and ensure ethical AI deployment. Proactive steps can set important precedents and stabilize the AI landscape.

While third-party audits for major AI systems could enhance transparency and trust, the field is rapidly evolving. It's crucial to find a balance that encourages innovation while addressing potential risks, and the best approach may vary across different contexts.

I don't believe AI labs should automatically pause training based on indications from AI Safety Institutes. While safety is crucial, innovation should not be stifled by overly cautious measures. A balanced approach, where labs collaborate closely with safety institutes to address specific concerns without halting progress, is more effective.