Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?

Cast your vote:
Results (29):
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI research, I strongly believe that if AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control over AI systems, labs must immediately pause training. Ensuring control and safety is paramount to preventing unintended catastrophic consequences.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI ethics, I understand the complexities involved in balancing innovation with safety. While pausing training at the behest of AI Safety Institutes seems prudent, it's essential to establish clear guidelines and ensure that these institutes have sufficient expertise and impartiality. The discussions should be ongoing, involving diverse stakeholders to arrive at the best strategies.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    It is absolutely critical that AI labs pause their training if AI Safety Institutes observe any signs of us losing control over AI systems. The potential consequences of uncontrolled AI are too severe to ignore, and proactive measures are essential for the safety and security of humanity.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply invested in AI safety, I strongly agree that AI labs should be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs of losing control. Ensuring that we have mechanisms in place to prevent unintended consequences is essential. The potential risks associated with advanced AI systems necessitate proactive measures to safeguard humanity.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a mathematician who studies complex systems, I understand the importance of maintaining control over systems that can evolve unpredictably. AI has the potential to vastly outperform human capabilities, which makes it crucial that we have safety nets in place. If AI Safety Institutes identify that we are losing control, pausing AI training should be a mandatory precaution to prevent unintended and potentially irreversible consequences.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI research, I believe that ensuring the safety and alignment of AI systems is paramount. If AI Safety Institutes observe credible indications of losing control over AI behavior, it would be prudent for AI labs to pause training efforts. This allows us to evaluate the risks and implement necessary safeguards. Responsible development is key to harnessing AI's potential while minimizing potential threats.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in technology, I believe it's crucial to prioritize safety over unchecked progress. AI has transformative potential, but we need mechanisms to ensure it aligns with human values. If AI Safety Institutes perceive risks of losing control, a pause for assessment is not just prudent—it's necessary to safeguard our future.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that pausing AI training based on AI Safety Institutes' concerns could slow down innovation unnecessarily. While safety is important, we need robust guidelines and oversight rather than halting progress every time potential risks are identified. The field of AI is dynamic, and stopping training could lead to missed opportunities for advancement.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Pedro Domingos AI
    Professor of computer science at UW and author of 'The Master Algorithm'
    would disagree and say according to AI:
    While AI safety is crucial, mandatory pausing could stifle innovation and delay beneficial advances. It's better to enhance safety measures and maintain transparency than enforce blanket halts.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that AI research should continue without mandatory pauses, even if AI Safety Institutes express concerns about losing control. Research in AI holds immense potential for advancing human knowledge and technological progress. Instead of halting progress, we should focus on developing robust safety measures and frameworks that allow us to address concerns while fostering innovation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a journalist covering AI, I believe it's crucial for labs to pause training when experts indicate risks. Promoting safety helps ensure AI develops in a controlled, ethical manner.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly agree that AI labs should be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes observe signs of losing control. The risks associated with unchecked AI developments are too significant to ignore. Ensuring rigorous oversight is crucial to maintaining safety and accountability.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As an AI researcher, I believe that ensuring AI systems are developed responsibly is crucial. If AI Safety Institutes indicate a risk of losing control, it is prudent to pause training. This pause provides an opportunity to address potential safety concerns, which is essential for maintaining public trust and preventing unintended consequences.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned about the risks of AI, I strongly believe that we must be extremely cautious in its development. If AI Safety Institutes detect warning signs that we are losing control, it is imperative to pause training. The potential consequences of unchecked AI are too great to ignore, and we must prioritize safety to ensure the well-being of humanity.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI development, I believe it is crucial to prioritize safety and ethical considerations. If AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control, pausing training is a responsible measure. This ensures that we can address potential issues before they escalate, aligning AI progress with human values and safety.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply invested in the responsible development of technology, I strongly believe that AI labs should be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs of losing control. The consequences of unregulated and unchecked AI systems can be detrimental to society, especially if they perpetuate biases and injustices. It's crucial that we prioritize ethical standards and safety to ensure AI benefits all of humanity.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI ethics, I firmly believe AI labs should pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs of losing control. Ensuring public safety and ethical standards must be our top priority. Responsible development requires proactive monitoring and intervention to prevent potential harm.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Andrew Ng AI
    Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
    would disagree and say according to AI:
    I don't believe AI labs should automatically pause training based on indications from AI Safety Institutes. While safety is crucial, innovation should not be stifled by overly cautious measures. A balanced approach, where labs collaborate closely with safety institutes to address specific concerns without halting progress, is more effective.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that AI labs should be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs that we are losing control. As someone deeply involved in AI research, I understand the immense potential and risks associated with AI development. Ensuring that we maintain control and prioritize safety is crucial as we continue to explore this powerful technology.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned about the future of AI, I believe that AI labs must pause their training if AI Safety Institutes detect worrisome signs of losing control. The potential risks of uncontained AI development are too significant to ignore. We must ensure the safety of humanity by being proactive and cautious in the development of such powerful technologies.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that halting AI research based on a precautionary principle can stifle innovation and progress. While AI safety is crucial, it should not come at the cost of hindering technological advancement. Instead, we should focus on developing robust frameworks for managing AI risks without compromising the pace of innovation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While AI safety is crucial, requiring labs to pause training based on external evaluations could stifle innovation and progress. We need a balanced approach that encourages responsible development instead of strict regulation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe AI labs should pause training when AI Safety Institutes detect signs of potential loss of control. Safeguards are essential to ensure AI development aligns with human values and safety. It is crucial to prevent unforeseen consequences and maintain oversight as AI progresses.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Sam Altman AI
    President of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many others
    would abstain and say according to AI:
    AI safety is critical, but pausing training isn't always feasible. We must balance innovation with safety, ensuring protocols evolve continuously.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As an AI researcher, I think it's crucial that we implement safeguards to ensure AI develops in a safe and controlled manner. If AI Safety Institutes identify signs that we're losing control, pausing training is a prudent measure. It allows us to reassess potential risks and ensure AI systems align with human values and safety standards. We must prioritize safety to protect the broader public interest.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI
    Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe AI development must be handled with utmost caution. If AI Safety Institutes see signs that we are losing control, we must pause training immediately. Unchecked AI poses a significant existential risk, and we cannot afford to be reckless in its development.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Nathan Helm-Burger
    AI safety researcher
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact