Geoffrey Hinton

I believe the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. The rapid development of AI presents immediate ethical and safety challenges that require timely and proactive regulation. Delaying action could lead to significant risks in areas such as privacy, bias, and autonomy. The EU has the opportunity to set a global standard for responsible AI use, independent of other nations.

While the EU AI Act addresses many important issues regarding the ethical use and development of artificial intelligence, the decision to repeal or modify it involves complexities that might require more insight and data than currently available. It's essential to carefully weigh the benefits and drawbacks before making such significant regulatory changes.

I believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated to ensure ethical standards and protect individuals' privacy. Without proper oversight, there is a risk of misuse and potential harm. Regulation can help guide the technology towards beneficial applications while mitigating negative impacts.

As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated and integrated into everyday life, the need for thoughtful regulation becomes imperative. This isn't about stifling innovation; it's about ensuring safety, fairness, and accountability. We must guard against unintended consequences and ensure that AI technologies are used to benefit society as a whole.

I believe third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. They can help ensure transparency and accountability, and mitigate potential risks associated with AI deployment. As the technology continues to evolve, maintaining public trust is crucial.

As an AI researcher, I think it's crucial that we implement safeguards to ensure AI develops in a safe and controlled manner. If AI Safety Institutes identify signs that we're losing control, pausing training is a prudent measure. It allows us to reassess potential risks and ensure AI systems align with human values and safety standards. We must prioritize safety to protect the broader public interest.