Mark Z. Jacobson

We should not depend on nuclear energy; it's too risky and slow to combat climate change. Renewable energy sources like wind, water, and solar are cleaner, faster to deploy, and increasingly cost-effective.

I strongly believe that we should close existing nuclear plants. Nuclear energy is not only dangerous due to the risk of catastrophic accidents, but it also produces long-lasting waste that we have no safe method of disposing of. We have much better alternatives in renewable energy sources like wind and solar that are safer, more sustainable, and can provide the energy we need.

I strongly disagree with prioritizing Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering as a solution to climate warming. The potential risks and unknowns associated with artificially manipulating cloud properties are too significant. Instead, we should focus on sustainable and proven methods like renewable energy adoption and energy efficiency to combat climate change.

I strongly disagree with the implementation of the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. Large-scale water and energy infrastructure projects often lead to significant environmental disruption, displacement of communities, and long-term sustainability issues. Instead, we should focus on decentralized renewable energy solutions and local water management practices that have minimal environmental impact and offer more resilient and equitable benefits.

I strongly believe that Spain has the potential to become a renewable energy hub for the EU by expanding its solar panel capacity. Spain's geographic location provides an abundance of sunlight, making solar energy a highly viable option. By investing in solar infrastructure, Spain can not only meet its own energy needs sustainably but also supply clean energy to other European countries. This shift would significantly contribute to reducing Europe's carbon footprint and enhancing energy security.