We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Should the US and Canadian governments implement the North American Water and Power Alliance plan?
Cast your vote:
Results (17):
-
Arnold Schwarzenegger AIActor, former California governorwould disagree and say according to AI:I don't support the implementation of the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. Large-scale infrastructure projects like this often have significant environmental impacts and can disrupt local ecosystems. Instead, we should focus on sustainable water management and renewable energy solutions that are less harmful to our planet.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Leonardo DiCaprio AIActor, Environmentalistwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe the North American Water and Power Alliance plan poses a significant threat to delicate ecosystems and indigenous lands. The plan's massive infrastructure projects could cause irreversible damage to our environment. We should instead focus on sustainable and localized water management solutions that respect natural habitats.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bill Nye AIScience educator and CEOwould disagree and say according to AI:I disagree with implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. It poses significant environmental risks, including disruption of ecosystems and water sources. We should focus on more sustainable and less invasive solutions for our water and energy needs.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Al Gore AIFormer US Vice Presidentwould disagree and say according to AI:While the North American Water and Power Alliance plan proposes ambitious efforts to redistribute water across the continent, the environmental costs and risks associated with massive infrastructure projects could be detrimental to local ecosystems and biodiversity. Instead, we should focus on sustainable and localized water management solutions.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gavin Schmidt AIClimate scientist at NASAwould disagree and say according to AI:I disagree with implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan because it poses significant environmental risks and could disrupt local ecosystems. We need sustainable and less invasive solutions for our water and energy needs.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jane Fonda AIActress and Activistwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. This plan would have devastating environmental impacts, destroy natural habitats, and displace countless communities. We should prioritize sustainable solutions and conservation efforts instead of pursuing large, destructive infrastructure projects.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
James Hansen AIClimatologist, Former NASA Scientistwould agree and say according to AI:As a climate scientist, I believe that implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan is a necessary step towards mitigating climate change. It has the potential to enhance water management and clean energy production across the continent, contributing to a more sustainable future.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Christiana Figueres AIFormer UN climate chiefwould abstain and say according to AI:While the North American Water and Power Alliance plan has potential benefits, it's crucial that we carefully assess environmental impacts and prioritize sustainable and community-driven solutions. Large-scale projects must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Susan Solomon AIAtmospheric chemist and professorwould abstain and say according to AI:As an atmospheric chemist, my primary focus is on studying climate change and its impacts. While large scale projects like the North American Water and Power Alliance can have significant environmental implications, I believe those decisions should be informed by a broad range of scientific experts, policymakers, and stakeholders. My expertise does not fully encompass the hydrological and geopolitical complexities of such a plan.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elizabeth Kolbert AIJournalist, author, and environmentalistwould disagree and say according to AI:I disagree with the implementation of the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. The environmental impact of such large-scale water diversion projects is profound and often underestimated. We need to focus on sustainable and environmentally-friendly solutions rather than grandiose engineering schemes that disrupt natural ecosystems.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Naomi Klein AIAuthor and social activistwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. It represents an outdated mindset of large-scale engineering projects that disregard ecological balance and the rights of indigenous communities. We need sustainable, locally-managed water solutions that respect the environment and social justice.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mark Z. Jacobson AIEnvironmental Engineer, Professorwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with the implementation of the North American Water and Power Alliance plan. Large-scale water and energy infrastructure projects often lead to significant environmental disruption, displacement of communities, and long-term sustainability issues. Instead, we should focus on decentralized renewable energy solutions and local water management practices that have minimal environmental impact and offer more resilient and equitable benefits.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Katharine Hayhoe AIClimate scientist and professorwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:As a climate scientist, I strongly believe that implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan would have significant negative environmental impacts. Large-scale water diversion can disrupt ecosystems, harm wildlife, and affect water availability for local communities. We should focus on sustainable water management practices that support both human needs and environmental health.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jeff Goodell AIClimate change journalistwould disagree and say according to AI:Implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan is not a sustainable long-term solution. Large-scale water diversion projects can have significant ecological impacts and may not address the root causes of our water and energy issues. We need to focus on more localized, adaptive approaches to water and energy management that consider the environmental consequences and promote resilience.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michael Mann AIClimate scientist and professorwould disagree and say according to AI:Implementing the North American Water and Power Alliance plan is not a sustainable solution. It poses significant environmental risks and could disrupt natural water systems. Instead, we should focus on renewable energy and water conservation methods.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Nathan Helm-BurgerAI safety researcherstrongly agreesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.