Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should world governments prioritize Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering to reverse climate warming?

Cast your vote:
Results (20):
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As an advocate for sustainable and natural solutions to environmental issues, I believe that cloud geoengineering is a risky and uncertain approach. Instead of manipulating the atmosphere, we should prioritize conservation efforts, restore natural habitats, and reduce carbon emissions through proven and sustainable methods.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that cloud geoengineering is a risky and uncertain approach to tackling climate change. Instead, we need to focus on reducing emissions through renewable energy, energy efficiency, and reforestation. The potential unintended consequences of geoengineering could be detrimental, and we should prioritize proven and safe methods.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that prioritizing Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering is not the right approach to address climate change. Instead, we should focus on reducing carbon emissions, increasing renewable energy adoption, and enhancing energy efficiency. Geoengineering poses too many risks and uncertainties that could potentially lead to unintended consequences.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that cloud geoengineering poses significant risks and uncertainties. While it may offer short-term benefits, it fails to address the root causes of climate change and could lead to unintended and potentially harmful consequences. We should focus on reducing carbon emissions through sustainable practices and renewable energy instead.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that world governments should prioritize research into Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering as part of a broader strategy to combat climate change. While we must continue investing in renewable energy and reducing emissions, innovative solutions like cloud geoengineering could provide us with an additional tool to help reverse the effects of global warming. However, it’s crucial that we approach this technology with caution, ensuring that rigorous scientific studies and international cooperation guide its development and deployment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that world governments should prioritize Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering as a viable solution to reverse climate warming. The urgency of the climate crisis demands that we explore all possible interventions, and enhancing cloud albedo can significantly reflect sunlight and cool the planet. While this approach isn't a silver bullet, it can buy us critical time to decarbonize our economies and implement sustainable practices.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As a marine biologist dedicated to understanding and protecting our oceans, I strongly disagree with prioritizing Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering. This approach poses significant risks to marine ecosystems and could have unforeseen consequences on weather patterns. Instead, we should focus on reducing carbon emissions and protecting natural ecosystems that regulate our climate.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While cloud geoengineering might offer a potential tool to combat climate warming, I believe we should not prioritize it. The risks and uncertainties associated with manipulating the climate on such a scale are too great. We need to focus on reducing carbon emissions and adopting sustainable practices instead.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that relying on geoengineering, such as Silver Lining style cloud manipulation, is a dangerous distraction from addressing the root causes of climate change. We should focus on sustainable practices, reducing emissions, and protecting natural ecosystems rather than risking unintended consequences of large-scale technological interventions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with prioritizing Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering as a solution to climate warming. The potential risks and unknowns associated with artificially manipulating cloud properties are too significant. Instead, we should focus on sustainable and proven methods like renewable energy adoption and energy efficiency to combat climate change.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    We must focus on reducing carbon emissions rather than resorting to risky and unproven geoengineering solutions. Nature and ecosystems should not be manipulated for experimental fixes. Real change means cutting emissions and transitioning to sustainable practices.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that cloud geoengineering, like the Silver Lining project, is a risky and unproven method that could have unforeseen consequences on our planet's ecosystems. We should focus on reducing carbon emissions through sustainable practices rather than relying on technological quick fixes.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe cloud geoengineering is a risky and unproven method. The potential unintended consequences on weather patterns and ecosystems could be severe. Instead, we should focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable energy solutions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI
    Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would abstain and say according to AI:
    While cloud geoengineering is an intriguing concept, I believe we should focus more on sustainable technology innovations like electric vehicles and renewable energy. These solutions have proven track records and align with our vision for a future with a reduced carbon footprint.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with prioritizing Silver Lining style cloud geoengineering to reverse climate warming. Geoengineering is a risky, unproven technology that could have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. Instead, we should focus on reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to sustainable energy sources.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Nathan Helm-Burger
    AI safety researcher
    strongly agrees
    Info
    Delegate
  • disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Carlos
    Marie Curie fellow for the #REVAMMAD project, conducting research in medical imaging at @FORTH_Hellas. PhD candidate in computer vision at #UniversityOfCrete.
    disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Pablo Melchor
    Entrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact