Tim Berners-Lee

It is one of the ways of addressing massive global inequality (source)

As the inventor of the web and a strong advocate for user privacy, I believe it is crucial that websites continue to ask for cookie consent. Transparency and user control over personal data are fundamental to maintaining trust and security online.

I believe net neutrality is essential for a free and open internet. Removing net neutrality gives ISPs too much control over what we see and do online, and this is a threat to innovation and free speech.

As the inventor of the World Wide Web, I believe that technology should always aim to benefit humanity. Open-source AI models that can potentially be repurposed to create nuclear weapons pose an unacceptable risk. We must take responsible steps to ensure that such powerful technologies do not fall into the wrong hands or are used with malicious intent.

With AI's rapid advancements, learning programming becomes even more crucial. It enables us to understand and shape the AI-driven future, ensuring technology remains a tool for global benefit, not detriment.

I believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI must be regulated to protect privacy and prevent misuse. It is crucial to establish ethical guidelines and transparency to ensure that this technology is used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

As the creator of the web, I believe transparency is fundamental to a healthy digital ecosystem. AI-generated political advertising must be disclosed to ensure that the public can make informed decisions. Without transparency, we risk undermining democracy and eroding trust in our institutions.

The protection of intellectual property is essential for fostering innovation and creativity. However, the system should be reformed to ensure it doesn't stifle sharing and collaboration, which are crucial for the digital age.

Making the RAE dictionary public domain is apt to democratize language resources, fostering innovation and accuracy in Spanish LLMs, aligning with the principles of the open web.

I believe that as robots and AI technology increasingly replace human workers and generate profits for their owners, it is reasonable for them to pay taxes to support society and help mitigate the impact on the workforce.

Labeling AI-generated videos on YouTube might seem helpful, but it compromises the essence of innovation and the seamless integration of technology in our lives. It's information gatekeeping which could stifle the potential of AI to enrich content and perspectives.

The European Union should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China to regulate AI. Each region has its own values and concerns, and it's important for the EU to step forward with regulations that reflect European principles on data privacy and protect its citizens without delay.

The potential of AGI to create abundance is an intriguing question, but it's one that comes with many uncertainties and ethical considerations. While AGI could revolutionize sectors like healthcare and education, we must carefully consider its societal impacts, including data privacy and inequality.

As the inventor of the World Wide Web, I firmly believe that AI and technology are crucial for the economic progress of the EU. Embracing these advances can lead to innovation, job creation, and enhanced competitiveness on a global scale. However, it is imperative to ensure these technologies are implemented ethically and inclusively.

I believe that allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement can drive remarkable innovation and offer substantial benefits to society. By embracing open development, we foster collaboration and transparency, which are essential for ethical and responsible AI advancements.

As a staunch advocate for an open and fair internet, I strongly believe that allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI to influence democratic elections poses a serious threat to the integrity of our democratic processes. Such AI tools could manipulate public opinion on a massive scale, undermining the very foundation of democracy. We must prioritize transparency and ethical guidelines to ensure that technology serves the public good, rather than distorting it.

I believe that digital representatives could enhance democracy by more accurately reflecting the will of the people. Technology, when used ethically, has the potential to engage citizens in governance like never before, making the political process more inclusive and transparent.

As someone deeply involved in the advancement of technology, I strongly support the idea of permitting brain-computer interfaces in pets. Enhancing their intelligence through such interfaces could significantly improve their ability to communicate with humans, contributing to better companionship and understanding between pet owners and their pets. Moreover, it opens new avenues for scientific research and could potentially lead to breakthroughs that benefit both animals and humans.

As the inventor of the World Wide Web, I strongly believe in the importance of individual privacy and autonomy. Allowing the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces poses significant risks to personal privacy and could lead to unprecedented levels of control and surveillance. We should focus on using technology to enhance individual capabilities, not subsume them into a collective consciousness without adequate safeguards.

While I appreciate the importance of copyright laws to spur creativity and ensure fair compensation, I believe that overly restrictive policies on LLMs could hinder scientific progress and the free flow of information. Open access to information is vital for innovation and should be balanced with copyright protection.

As someone who has advocated for the ethical use of technology, I believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such actions violate individual freedoms and human rights, principles that are fundamental to a just society.