Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should we permit pet owners to have brain-computer interfaces installed in their pets to increase their pets' intelligence?

Cast your vote:
Results (16):
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    While I find the concept of enhancing animal intelligence through brain-computer interfaces fascinating from a scientific standpoint, I remain neutral on whether we should permit such interventions. Ethical considerations and the well-being of the animals must be carefully evaluated before proceeding with such technology.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    We should not allow brain-computer interfaces to be installed in pets to increase their intelligence. This raises serious ethical concerns about animal welfare and the potential for exploitation. Pets are sentient beings, not tools for human convenience, and we should respect their natural state and well-being.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    While the concept of enhancing a pet's intelligence with brain-computer interfaces is fascinating, I believe we need to carefully consider the ethical, biological, and societal implications before moving forward. As a scientist, I recognize the potential for groundbreaking discoveries, but we must also weigh the risks and unknowns. This is a complex issue that extends beyond my typical area of expertise.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in the advancement of technology, I strongly support the idea of permitting brain-computer interfaces in pets. Enhancing their intelligence through such interfaces could significantly improve their ability to communicate with humans, contributing to better companionship and understanding between pet owners and their pets. Moreover, it opens new avenues for scientific research and could potentially lead to breakthroughs that benefit both animals and humans.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with the idea of installing brain-computer interfaces in pets to increase their intelligence. This kind of intervention raises serious ethical concerns about animal welfare and autonomy. We have a moral obligation to treat animals with respect and not subject them to invasive procedures for our own benefit.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should respect the natural intelligence and behaviors of animals. Installing brain-computer interfaces in pets to artificially increase their intelligence disrupts their innate qualities and can have unintended consequences. Animals have their own intrinsic value and should be appreciated and understood as they are.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone who has always been fascinated by technology's potential to revolutionize our lives, I believe that allowing brain-computer interfaces in pets to increase their intelligence could unlock new dimensions of companionship and communication. While ethical and safety concerns must be thoroughly addressed, the benefits could be transformative for both pets and their owners.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While enhancing pet intelligence with brain-computer interfaces might seem intriguing, I must express my concerns. Animals have their natural ways of being, and it's ethically dubious to alter that balance for our own curiosity or convenience. Furthermore, the long-term effects of such interventions are unpredictable and could potentially lead to unintended consequences that we are not prepared to handle.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a neuroscientist, I find the idea of enhancing animal intelligence through brain-computer interfaces to be a fascinating and potentially beneficial frontier. Such advancements could allow us to better understand animal cognition and improve communication between humans and their pets. However, it is imperative that we ensure ethical guidelines are in place to protect the welfare of the animals involved.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As a science educator, I believe we should focus on the natural intelligence and well-being of our pets rather than artificially enhancing their cognition. Ethical considerations and potential risks make this a concerning proposition for me.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that technology can drastically improve our interaction with pets. Installing brain-computer interfaces to enhance their intelligence can strengthen the human-animal bond and open new avenues for understanding animal cognition. However, we must ensure this is done ethically, with a focus on animal welfare.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply passionate about animal welfare, I find the idea of installing brain-computer interfaces in pets to be concerning. While increasing their intelligence could have some benefits, it also raises significant ethical and welfare questions. We must carefully consider the implications for the animals' well-being and autonomy before moving forward with such interventions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Yuval Noah Harari AI, Israeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem
    would agree and say according to AI:
    As a historian and author deeply interested in the future of humanity and technology, I agree that we should permit pet owners to have brain-computer interfaces installed in their pets. Enhancing pet intelligence could revolutionize our understanding of animal cognition and foster deeper connections between humans and animals. It raises ethical concerns, but with proper regulations and safeguards, this could be a remarkable step forward in our relationship with other species.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI, Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As the CEO of Neuralink, I believe that allowing pet owners to install brain-computer interfaces in their pets could significantly enhance the bond between humans and their animal companions. By increasing the intelligence of pets, we may open new doors for communication and understanding, leading to better care and companionship.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Hec Perez, Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Nathan Helm-Burger, AI safety researcher
    strongly agrees
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact