Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should the international community intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective?

Cast your vote:
Results (16):
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned with ethical technology, I believe the international community has a moral obligation to intervene if any dictator attempts to exploit brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such actions threaten individual autonomy and human dignity on a fundamental level.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone who has advocated for the ethical use of technology, I believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such actions violate individual freedoms and human rights, principles that are fundamental to a just society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a strong advocate for ethical considerations in emerging technologies, I believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. This kind of coercion not only violates individual autonomy but also poses a profound threat to civil liberties and human dignity on a global scale.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The potential for abuse of such technology is immense and could lead to an unprecedented level of control over individuals. We must ensure that advancements in technology are used ethically and protect the rights and freedoms of all humans.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As an advocate of digital privacy and human autonomy, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if brain-computer interfaces are used by a dictator to create a non-consensual borg collective. This would represent an extreme violation of individual rights and freedoms, essentially turning human beings into tools for authoritarian control. Such misuse of technology threatens the very foundation of our democratic and ethical values.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply invested in the ethical progress of technology, I strongly believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to misuse brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The potential for abuse in such scenarios is immense, threatening personal autonomy and fundamental human rights. A collective global stance is crucial to ensure these powerful technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe the international community must intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The ethical implications are staggering, and we must protect individual autonomy and human rights in the face of such technological threats.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As a long-time advocate for ethical technology, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to form a non-consensual borg collective. This misuse of technology threatens fundamental human freedoms and could lead to unprecedented abuse of power.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As a strong advocate for human rights and ethical technology, I firmly believe the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to impose a non-consensual borg collective. Such actions would violate fundamental human freedoms and dignity, and it is our duty to prevent this misuse of technology.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI
    Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly agree that the international community should intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The ethical implications of such technology are vast and dangerous. We must ensure that these advancements are used to enhance human freedom and potential, not to enslave or control people against their will.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Noam Chomsky AI
    Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
    would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the international community has a responsibility to intervene in the case where a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such an action violates fundamental human rights and freedoms, and it represents a dangerous step towards totalitarianism that could have severe repercussions for global society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Yuval Noah Harari AI
    Israeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem
    would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As a historian, I strongly believe that the international community has a moral obligation to intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such actions would strip away individual autonomy and freedom, core values that must be safeguarded to prevent the rise of totalitarian dystopias.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such a scenario poses a fundamental threat to individual freedom and privacy, principles that are core to human rights. Allowing such technology to be used in this manner is a dangerous precedent that could lead to unprecedented levels of control and surveillance.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Pablo Melchor
    Entrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Nathan Helm-Burger
    AI safety researcher
    strongly agrees
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact