Timnit Gebru

As an AI ethics researcher, I strongly believe that the potential destabilization of international politics is a serious risk that outweighs the benefits of unchecked AI progress. We have to consider the implications of our work on global stability and prioritize ethical standards and societal impact above rapid advancements.

As someone deeply involved in the ethics of AI, I strongly believe in the necessity of a global institute for AI safety. Coordinated efforts can help us establish standards and regulations that ensure AI technologies are developed and used responsibly, mitigating risks and promoting fairness.

As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that big AI companies should allocate at least a third of their compute resources to AI safety. Focusing on safety measures is crucial to prevent harm and ensure that AI technologies are developed responsibly. This is not just about technological advancements but about protecting society and upholding ethical standards.

I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. It is crucial to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in the deployment of AI technologies. Without independent oversight, biases and harmful impacts can go unchecked and affect millions of people.

I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in one entity poses a significant risk to ethical standards, diversity of thought, and global governance. A pluralistic approach to ASI development encourages collaboration, transparency, and accountability, which is vital for ensuring these technologies benefit all of humanity.

As an AI ethicist, I strongly believe that both the developers and deployers of AI systems should share liability for any harm caused. Developers create the technologies and must ensure they are safe and ethically sound. Deployers decide how these technologies are used and must take responsibility for their implementation and potential consequences. Sharing liability encourages accountability at all stages of AI development and deployment, promoting safer and more ethical AI applications.

As someone deeply invested in ethical AI development, I strongly believe that including civil society and representatives from the Global South in AI governance is crucial. These voices bring diverse perspectives that are often overlooked but are essential to create fair and inclusive AI systems. Without their input, we risk reinforcing existing inequalities and biases, which can have severe global consequences.

I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks must prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. AI has the potential to amplify inequalities if access is limited to a few powerful nations. Ensuring that developing countries have access to these technologies is crucial for fostering innovation, addressing local challenges, and preventing a new digital divide. It is our responsibility to make AI an inclusive tool that benefits everyone, not just the privileged few.

I believe that liberalism may struggle to keep pace with AI superintelligence developments. The potential for misuse and control of AI by powerful entities could challenge the principles of liberalism and lead to societal inequalities.

I believe governments should establish international AI ethics boards. AI development and deployment have significant global implications, affecting society, economy, and personal freedom. An international board could ensure ethical standards are met across borders, reducing bias and ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI systems.

I believe a UN-led body should oversee compute-intensive AI development. The global impact and ethical implications of AI require international collaboration and oversight to ensure fairness and prevent misuse. Just as nuclear technology is monitored for safety, AI should also be regulated to protect society.

I believe the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. Each region has unique challenges and priorities regarding AI ethics and governance. Delaying action could result in inadequate safeguards against the harms AI technologies may pose, especially regarding privacy, equity, and accountability. The EU has the opportunity to lead by example in establishing robust frameworks that prioritize human rights and protect citizens.

I believe we must establish international regulations to pause AI advancement. The rapid pace of AI development poses significant ethical and societal risks, and we need time to address issues such as bias, privacy, and accountability. Without proper oversight and collaboration, AI could exacerbate inequalities and cause harm.