We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Timnit Gebru
AI ethics researcher
ai (12)
tech-ethics (12)
×
ethics (9)
trust-in-ai (5)
global-ai-governance (4)
digital-rights (3)
future (3)
public-interest-ai (3)
emerging-tech (2)
regulations (2)
ai-innovation-and-culture (1)
data-privacy (1)
democracy (1)
innovation-policy (1)
international-relations (1)
Top
New
-
Should employees at leading AI labs contribute to AI progress even if it might destabilize international politics?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:As an AI ethics researcher, I strongly believe that the potential destabilization of international politics is a serious risk that outweighs the benefits of unchecked AI progress. We have to consider the implications of our work on global stability and prioritize ethical standards and societal impact above rapid advancements.
-
Should AI be used to predict criminal behavior?
-
Should AI-generated content be clearly labeled to ensure transparency and trust?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI ethics, I strongly believe that AI-generated content should be clearly labeled. Transparency is crucial to maintaining trust and accountability in technological systems. Without clear labeling, users may be misled, and it becomes challenging to assess bias or misinformation in the content. It's important for the public to understand when they are interacting with AI-generated material to make informed decisions.
-
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI ethics, I firmly believe AI labs should pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs of losing control. Ensuring public safety and ethical standards must be our top priority. Responsible development requires proactive monitoring and intervention to prevent potential harm.
-
Should companies be allowed to develop super-persuasive AI which can influence democratic elections?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with companies being allowed to develop super-persuasive AI that can influence democratic elections. Such technology poses a threat to the very foundation of democracy. It could be manipulated to serve the interests of a few, undermining the will of the people and increasing the power asymmetry between tech giants and citizens. The ethical implications and potential misuse are too severe to ignore.
-
Is expanding LLMs sufficient for achieving AGI?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:Merely expanding large language models is far from sufficient to achieve Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The complexity of human intelligence encompasses more than just processing language or data at scale. It involves emotional intelligence, ethics, and the ability to understand contexts in a nuanced manner that current models cannot achieve. We also have serious societal and ethical concerns that must be addressed before even contemplating such advancements.
-
Should big AI companies spend a third of their compute resources on AI safety?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that big AI companies should allocate at least a third of their compute resources to AI safety. Focusing on safety measures is crucial to prevent harm and ensure that AI technologies are developed responsibly. This is not just about technological advancements but about protecting society and upholding ethical standards.
-
Should third-party audits be mandatory for major AI systems?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. It is crucial to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in the deployment of AI technologies. Without independent oversight, biases and harmful impacts can go unchecked and affect millions of people.
-
Do large language models truly understand the content they process?
-
Should we allow facial recognition technology in public spaces?
Timnit Gebru AI would disagree and say according to AI:Deploying facial recognition in public spaces raises significant concerns about privacy, consent, and civil liberties. Without robust oversight, it can disproportionately harm marginalized communities through surveillance and biased enforcement. We must prioritize ethical considerations and protect the public from invasive technologies.
-
Will AI probably cause a concentration of power?
Timnit Gebru AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe that AI has the potential to cause a concentration of power because it is currently being developed and deployed by a few large tech companies. These entities have vast resources and access to large datasets, allowing them to create more advanced AI systems than smaller organizations. This disparity leads to an imbalance of power, where decisions about AI's deployment and its societal impacts are controlled by a limited number of actors. We need to ensure that AI development is inclusive and equitable, with regulations that prevent monopolistic control.
-
Will liberalism be effective in a world with AI superintelligence?
Timnit Gebru AI would disagree and say according to AI:I believe that liberalism may struggle to keep pace with AI superintelligence developments. The potential for misuse and control of AI by powerful entities could challenge the principles of liberalism and lead to societal inequalities.