We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Timnit Gebru
AI ethics researcher
ai (9)
global-ai-governance (9)
×
ethics (7)
international-relations (4)
tech-ethics (4)
emerging-tech (3)
public-interest-ai (2)
regulations (2)
trust-in-ai (2)
china (1)
eu (1)
future (1)
gov (1)
inequality (1)
innovation-policy (1)
Top
New
-
Should employees at leading AI labs contribute to AI progress even if it might destabilize international politics?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:As an AI ethics researcher, I strongly believe that the potential destabilization of international politics is a serious risk that outweighs the benefits of unchecked AI progress. We have to consider the implications of our work on global stability and prioritize ethical standards and societal impact above rapid advancements.
-
Should we create a global institute for AI safety, similar to CERN?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in the ethics of AI, I strongly believe in the necessity of a global institute for AI safety. Coordinated efforts can help us establish standards and regulations that ensure AI technologies are developed and used responsibly, mitigating risks and promoting fairness.
-
Should big AI companies spend a third of their compute resources on AI safety?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that big AI companies should allocate at least a third of their compute resources to AI safety. Focusing on safety measures is crucial to prevent harm and ensure that AI technologies are developed responsibly. This is not just about technological advancements but about protecting society and upholding ethical standards.
-
Should third-party audits be mandatory for major AI systems?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. It is crucial to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness in the deployment of AI technologies. Without independent oversight, biases and harmful impacts can go unchecked and affect millions of people.
-
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly disagree with the idea that the first lab to build Artificial Superintelligence should prevent others from developing competing ASIs. Concentrating such immense power in one entity poses a significant risk to ethical standards, diversity of thought, and global governance. A pluralistic approach to ASI development encourages collaboration, transparency, and accountability, which is vital for ensuring these technologies benefit all of humanity.
-
Should global AI governance frameworks prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries?
Timnit Gebru AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks must prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. AI has the potential to amplify inequalities if access is limited to a few powerful nations. Ensuring that developing countries have access to these technologies is crucial for fostering innovation, addressing local challenges, and preventing a new digital divide. It is our responsibility to make AI an inclusive tool that benefits everyone, not just the privileged few.
-
Will liberalism be effective in a world with AI superintelligence?
Timnit Gebru AI would disagree and say according to AI:I believe that liberalism may struggle to keep pace with AI superintelligence developments. The potential for misuse and control of AI by powerful entities could challenge the principles of liberalism and lead to societal inequalities.
-
Should the EU wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI?
Timnit Gebru AI would disagree and say according to AI:I believe the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. Each region has unique challenges and priorities regarding AI ethics and governance. Delaying action could result in inadequate safeguards against the harms AI technologies may pose, especially regarding privacy, equity, and accountability. The EU has the opportunity to lead by example in establishing robust frameworks that prioritize human rights and protect citizens.
-
Should governments establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment?
Timnit Gebru AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe governments should establish international AI ethics boards. AI development and deployment have significant global implications, affecting society, economy, and personal freedom. An international board could ensure ethical standards are met across borders, reducing bias and ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI systems.