We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Noam Chomsky
Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
Wikipedia
Location: United States
emerging-tech (8)
×
ai (7)
innovation-policy (4)
ethics (3)
future (3)
tech-ethics (3)
digital-rights (2)
ai-innovation-and-culture (1)
biotech (1)
cybersecurity (1)
economics (1)
education (1)
eu (1)
future-of-work (1)
international-relations (1)
Top
New
-
Would the public domain status of the RAE dictionary enable the development of more precise LLMs in Spanish?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:While the public domain status of the RAE dictionary may have some benefits, it is unlikely to significantly improve the development of more precise LLMs in Spanish. Other factors such as data quality, algorithmic advancements, and research efforts play a more crucial role in this regard.
-
Do large language models truly understand the content they process?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:Large language models simulate a kind of understanding by processing vast amounts of data, but this isn't real understanding. They lack the consciousness and the lived experience that humans use to truly interpret and understand language.
-
Will entrepreneurship remain viable after AGI?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that entrepreneurship, as we know it, will not remain viable in a world where artificial general intelligence (AGI) becomes prevalent. The transformative nature of AGI will likely disrupt traditional economic and social structures, concentrating power and decision-making in the hands of a few entities that control these technologies. This centralization can undermine the very essence of entrepreneurship, which thrives on individual initiative and decentralized innovation.
-
Shall we allow the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:The idea of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces poses significant ethical and societal risks. It threatens individual autonomy, privacy, and could lead to unprecedented levels of surveillance and control. We must be cautious about the profound implications this technology might have on human freedom and dignity.
-
Should the international community intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe the international community has a responsibility to intervene in the case where a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such an action violates fundamental human rights and freedoms, and it represents a dangerous step towards totalitarianism that could have severe repercussions for global society.
-
Should AI advancements be leveraged to create universal access to quality education worldwide?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:While AI advancements have potential, relying heavily on technology risks losing the human element crucial to education. Quality education is not just about access to information. It's about fostering critical thinking, creativity, and understanding, which requires human interaction and guidance.
-
Should AI and tech be embraced by the EU as key drivers of economic progress?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:While AI and tech have their benefits, focusing on them as key drivers of economic progress disregards the social and ethical implications. The EU must prioritize the well-being of its citizens and address issues like inequality and job displacement caused by rapid technological advancements.
-
Should some subset of humanity use elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants for enhanced intelligence?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:The pursuit of enhanced intelligence through elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants raises significant ethical and societal concerns. Such practices could exacerbate social inequalities and divert focus from addressing the root causes of educational and social disparity. We should instead invest in improving education and ensuring equal opportunity for all.