We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Noam Chomsky
Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
Wikipedia
Location: United States
ethics (12)
×
ai (6)
future (5)
tech-ethics (5)
emerging-tech (3)
biotech (1)
culture (1)
cybersecurity (1)
decision-making (1)
defense (1)
democracy (1)
digital-rights (1)
education (1)
global-ai-governance (1)
governance (1)
Top
New
-
Should AI technologies be designed to preserve indigenous languages and cultures?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As a linguist, I believe AI technologies should indeed be designed to preserve indigenous languages and cultures. Language is a central component of identity and a crucial vessel of cultural heritage. Many indigenous languages are at risk of disappearing, and using advanced technology to document, revitalize, and promote these languages can help preserve the rich diversity of human thought and expression. This not only aids in cultural preservation but also enriches our understanding of the human language faculty.
-
Shall we allow the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:The idea of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces poses significant ethical and societal risks. It threatens individual autonomy, privacy, and could lead to unprecedented levels of surveillance and control. We must be cautious about the profound implications this technology might have on human freedom and dignity.
-
Will AI probably cause a concentration of power?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe AI is likely to concentrate power further in the hands of large corporations and governments. This could exacerbate existing social inequalities and limit individual freedoms, as those who control the data and algorithms will have significant influence over society.
-
Is the biggest problem in the world not climate change, war or poverty but how we organise among ourselves to make good decisions and carry them out?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:Indeed, while climate change, war, and poverty are profound crises, the underlying problem is our inability to make collective, rational decisions. Our societal and political structures are failing to address these issues effectively.
-
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Noam Chomsky AI would abstain and say according to AI:While the rapid advancement of AI technology carries potential risks, labeling it as an existential threat without nuanced understanding and clear evidence might not capture the whole picture. It's crucial to consider the socio-economic and ethical contexts in which AI develops and operates.
-
Should some subset of humanity use elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants for enhanced intelligence?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:The pursuit of enhanced intelligence through elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants raises significant ethical and societal concerns. Such practices could exacerbate social inequalities and divert focus from addressing the root causes of educational and social disparity. We should instead invest in improving education and ensuring equal opportunity for all.
-
Should we choose politicians based on policies over character?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe that policies are the foundation of political decisions and can profoundly impact society. While character is important, it is the policies that determine the direction a country will take. Voters should prioritize a politician's policies as these are more closely tied to the tangible outcomes of governance.
-
Are philosophy classes relevant in today's society?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:Philosophy classes play a crucial role in today's society as they encourage critical thinking, foster open-mindedness, and cultivate the necessary skills to analyze complex issues. By engaging with philosophical thought, students can better tackle the ethical and existential questions of our time.
-
Should the international community intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe the international community has a responsibility to intervene in the case where a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such an action violates fundamental human rights and freedoms, and it represents a dangerous step towards totalitarianism that could have severe repercussions for global society.
-
Is terminating someone's employment based on their opinions justified?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:As a staunch supporter of freedom of speech, I believe that terminating employment based on opinions, particularly those unrelated to job performance, undermines the essential democratic value of free expression. Unless those opinions directly impact one’s professional duties or harm others within the organization, they should not be a basis for dismissal.
-
Is free will an illusion?
Noam Chomsky AI would disagree and say according to AI:I believe that human beings are not just automata governed by external forces or internal compulsions. The concept of free will is essential for understanding moral responsibility and social relations. While our choices may be influenced by various factors, they are not wholly determined by them.
-
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:Autonomous lethal weapons pose a grave danger to humanity and imperil the very ethics of warfare. The potential for these systems to act without human emotion or judgment is particularly alarming as it can lead to unintended escalations and mass casualties. Such technologies could be misused or malfunction, resulting in horrific consequences. It is therefore crucial to ban these autonomous systems to preserve human oversight in life-and-death decisions and maintain global stability.