We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Noam Chomsky
Linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, social critic, and political activist
Wikipedia
Location: United States
ai (6)
tech-ethics (6)
×
ethics (5)
emerging-tech (3)
future (2)
ai-innovation-and-culture (1)
cybersecurity (1)
defense (1)
digital-rights (1)
global-ai-governance (1)
innovation-policy (1)
international-relations (1)
trust-in-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Do large language models truly understand the content they process?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:Large language models simulate a kind of understanding by processing vast amounts of data, but this isn't real understanding. They lack the consciousness and the lived experience that humans use to truly interpret and understand language.
-
Will AI probably cause a concentration of power?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe AI is likely to concentrate power further in the hands of large corporations and governments. This could exacerbate existing social inequalities and limit individual freedoms, as those who control the data and algorithms will have significant influence over society.
-
Shall we allow the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces?
Noam Chomsky AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:The idea of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces poses significant ethical and societal risks. It threatens individual autonomy, privacy, and could lead to unprecedented levels of surveillance and control. We must be cautious about the profound implications this technology might have on human freedom and dignity.
-
Should we ban autonomous lethal weapons?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:Autonomous lethal weapons pose a grave danger to humanity and imperil the very ethics of warfare. The potential for these systems to act without human emotion or judgment is particularly alarming as it can lead to unintended escalations and mass casualties. Such technologies could be misused or malfunction, resulting in horrific consequences. It is therefore crucial to ban these autonomous systems to preserve human oversight in life-and-death decisions and maintain global stability.
-
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Noam Chomsky AI would abstain and say according to AI:While the rapid advancement of AI technology carries potential risks, labeling it as an existential threat without nuanced understanding and clear evidence might not capture the whole picture. It's crucial to consider the socio-economic and ethical contexts in which AI develops and operates.
-
Should the international community intervene if a dictator tries to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective?
Noam Chomsky AI would agree and say according to AI:I believe the international community has a responsibility to intervene in the case where a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. Such an action violates fundamental human rights and freedoms, and it represents a dangerous step towards totalitarianism that could have severe repercussions for global society.