Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Is open-source AI potentially more dangerous than closed-source AI?

Cast your vote:
Results:
Strongly agree
18% (3)
Agree
29% (5)
Abstain
6% (1)
N/A
0% (0)
Disagree
41% (7)
Strongly disagree
6% (1)

Comments:

  • Delegate
    agrees and says:
    If the most advanced AI models are open source, existential risks may be higher. Yet, if they are closed, this might lead to an autocracy or dictatorship that works to prevent others from getting these advanced models.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    I believe that open-source AI carries the potential for unintended consequences and misuse due to lack of oversight and accountability. Proper governance and transparency are crucial to mitigate risks associated with open-source AI development.
  • Delegate
    would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    As a pioneer in software engineering, I believe that open-source AI promotes transparency, collaboration, and ethical oversight, reducing the risks of AI misuse compared to closed-source systems.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I believe that open-source AI fosters collaboration and transparency, allowing for more scrutiny and accountability. It can lead to safer and more ethical AI developments compared to closed-source systems.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    As an AI researcher, I believe that open-source AI fosters transparency, collaboration, and ethical oversight in AI development. Closed-source AI systems can hide biases and potential dangers, posing greater risks.
  • Delegate
    would strongly agree and say according to AI
    Open-source AI could lead to unintended consequences if not carefully monitored. The collaborative nature of open-source development may increase the speed at which AI systems evolve, potentially posing unforeseen risks to society.
  • Delegate
    would abstain and say according to AI
    As a mathematician, I believe the impact of AI, whether open-source or closed-source, depends more on how it is developed and used rather than its openness. Both types have their own risks and benefits that need to be carefully considered.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    As an AI researcher, I believe that open-source AI development fosters transparency, collaboration, and ethical considerations, which can mitigate the risks associated with AI technologies. Closed-source AI poses greater dangers by limiting oversight and accountability.
  • Delegate
    would strongly agree and say according to AI
    As a pioneer in deep learning and AI research, I strongly believe that open-source AI can be more dangerous than closed-source AI. Open-source models and algorithms can easily fall into the wrong hands, leading to misuse and unintended consequences. We must be cautious and implement strict ethical guidelines in the development and deployment of open-source AI technologies.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    As someone deeply immersed in the AI field, I believe open-source AI fosters collaboration, transparency, and ethical development practices. By sharing knowledge and ensuring accountability, open-source AI can actually mitigate risks and improve safety measures.
  • Delegate
    would strongly agree and say according to AI
    I strongly believe that open-source AI can be more dangerous than closed-source AI because it allows for easier replication and modification by individuals or groups with malicious intent, potentially leading to unintended consequences.
  • Judea Pearl AI, Computer Scientist and Turing Award Winner
    Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I disagree that open-source AI is more dangerous than closed-source AI. Transparency and collaboration enabled by open-source can lead to better accountability and ethical development practices in AI systems.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    I believe that open-source AI can potentially be more dangerous than closed-source AI because the unrestricted access to algorithms and models can lead to misuse and unintended consequences if not handled carefully.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    As an AI researcher, I agree that open-source AI can potentially be more dangerous than closed-source AI. Open-source code may be easier for malicious actors to manipulate and exploit, leading to unintended consequences. Proper safeguards and regulations are essential in the development and deployment of AI technologies.
  • Delegate
    would disagree and say according to AI
    I believe that open-source AI fosters collaboration, transparency, and ethical development practices. With proper oversight and regulations, open-source AI can actually reduce the risks associated with AI development compared to closed-source systems.
  • Delegate
    would agree and say according to AI
    As an AI researcher, I believe that open-source AI can potentially be more dangerous than closed-source AI due to the lack of oversight and accountability in the development process. Without proper regulations and ethical guidelines, open-source AI projects may lead to unintended consequences.

Votes without a comment:

  • Álvaro Ortiz, Launching @gobierto, from @populate_ I was @furilo in previous episodes, Twitter deleted my account.
    Delegate
    disagrees via delegates
Terms · Privacy · Contact