Elon Musk

In my opinion, TikTok should not be banned in the USA, even though such a ban may benefit the 𝕏 platform. Doing so would be contrary to freedom of speech and expression. It is not what America stands for. (source)

The only action needed to solve climate change is is a carbon tax. We should not, for example, impose draconian laws on farmers or make citizens uncomfortable by limiting air-conditioner usage! Keep tax revenue constant, but shift it to tax what is probably bad (CO2), just like alcohol & cigarettes are taxed more than fruits & vegetables. (source)

The least bad solution to the AGI control problem that I can think of is to give every verified human a vote. (source)

We should eliminate electronic voting machines. The risk of being hacked by humans or AI, while small, is still too high. (source)

I think we'll end up doing universal basic income. It's going to be necessary. (source)

I strongly believe that neural interfaces could indeed facilitate easier AI alignment. By creating a direct link between human minds and artificial intelligence, we can ensure that AI systems are more attuned to our values and intentions. This could help mitigate the risks associated with advanced AI and ensure that machines act in ways that are beneficial to humanity.

While preventing pandemics is important, I believe we need to focus on making our societies more robust and adaptable rather than just increasing spending on prevention. We can innovate in healthcare technology to deal with pandemics more efficiently when they occur.

I believe disagreements can be very interesting and valuable. They often lead to new insights and innovations. By challenging each other's views, we can push the boundaries of what's possible and come up with groundbreaking solutions.

We should consider repealing the EU AI Act as it potentially stifles innovation in AI technologies. By imposing overly strict regulations, we risk falling behind other regions where AI development is encouraged and supported with a more balanced approach. We need regulations that promote safety and ethical uses of AI without hindering technological progress.

I believe that while having an emergency fund can be useful for some, it's not absolutely necessary for everyone. The focus should be on investing in skills and creating value. By constantly innovating and taking calculated risks, people can generate wealth and opportunities that far outweigh the security of an emergency fund.

We must establish a city on Mars to preserve the light of consciousness. Making life multi-planetary will safeguard us against Earthly calamities and ensure the long-term survival of humanity.

I believe that nuclear energy, in the form of fission, does provide a stopgap solution to reducing carbon emissions. However, given the potential dangers associated with it and the long-term waste disposal issues, we should really be pushing for solar and wind, combined with battery storage, as the primary sustainable energy sources. These forms of energy production are far safer and truly renewable.

The use of copyrighted material in LLMs should be allowed to promote innovation and access to information. With proper attribution and fairness in use, LLMs can enhance learning and understanding.

Employment should be based on a person's ability to perform their job. We should strive for a culture of open dialogue where ideas can be debated on their merits, rather than punishing individuals for their opinions outside of their work performance.

We should definitely ban autonomous lethal weapons. The possibility of AI-controlled machines making life-or-death decisions without human oversight is deeply concerning and could lead to unintended escalations in conflict. It’s essential to maintain ethical standards in the use of technology to prevent potential misuses that could have irreversible consequences.

I disagree with using AI to predict criminal behavior. It raises significant ethical concerns and the potential for bias and errors could result in unjust outcomes. We should focus AI on improving humanity, not policing it.

I think YouTube has a responsibility to ensure transparency in content creation. Labeling AI-generated videos is crucial as it allows viewers to understand the origin and potentially question the content's credibility.

Investing in space exploration is essential for our future. It expands human knowledge, drives technological advancements, and addresses existential risks by enabling a multi-planetary species.

I strongly believe that we must ban future open-source AI models that could potentially be untrained to make nuclear weapons. The risks associated with such capabilities falling into the wrong hands are too great. We need strict regulations and oversight to ensure AI is developed safely and responsibly.

I believe that Formula 1 should introduce electric cars to lead by example in the transition towards sustainable energy. As the premier motorsport series, F1 has the opportunity to showcase electric vehicle performance and innovation.

Simply expanding large language models isn't sufficient for achieving artificial general intelligence. AGI requires not only understanding and processing words but also the ability to reason, adapt, and understand context at a human level, something current AI lacks.

I strongly believe the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated. As AI technology advances, the potential for misuse in terms of privacy invasion and manipulation becomes significant. Proper regulations are essential to ensure that these technologies are used responsibly and ethically.

We absolutely should not close existing nuclear plants. Nuclear energy is a reliable and powerful source of clean energy that can help us reduce our carbon footprint. Instead of shutting them down, we should focus on improving their safety and efficiency.

I believe financial education should be mandatory in high school. Understanding money management, investments, and economic principles is crucial for making informed decisions in life. Empowering students with this knowledge can lead to a more financially literate society.

Absolutely, learning programming is crucial even with AI advancements. Understanding the basics of programming not only enhances our ability to interact with and direct AI technologies effectively, but it also empowers us to innovate and contribute to the field. As AI continues to evolve, having a foundational knowledge in programming will be essential for shaping the future of technology.

I strongly believe that basic income is a better solution than a job guarantee. As automation continues to advance, many jobs will become obsolete. Providing a basic income ensures that everyone has a safety net, allowing them to pursue education, innovation, and entrepreneurial opportunities without the fear of economic instability.

Regulating AI is crucial for ensuring it benefits all of humanity while minimizing risks such as privacy invasion and unintended consequences. Government oversight and careful management are necessary to prevent AI from being misused or becoming uncontrollable.

Guessing is an essential part of innovation, especially when data is insufficient. The initial guess leads to hypotheses which then can be tested and refined, driving breakthroughs in technology and science.

I believe prediction markets have the potential to be effective for forecasting future events, as they harness collective intelligence and incentivize truth over consensus.

I strongly believe that companies should disclose when AI is used in customer service. Transparency builds trust with consumers, and people have a right to know when they are interacting with AI rather than a human. This also allows customers to make informed decisions about the services they use.

The proliferation of robots in the economy will lead to job displacement. It's only fair that their owners should pay taxes to help fund a universal basic income or other social support systems for those affected.

In my experience, as digital services scale up, maintaining quality and user experience often becomes more challenging. The complexity of infrastructure increases exponentially, which can lead to a degradation of service. It's imperative for companies to invest in scalable architecture and proactive problem-solving strategies to mitigate these risks.

I strongly believe that the development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) could swiftly evolve into superintelligence. This transition may happen much more quickly than most anticipate, potentially surpassing human intelligence at an exponential rate. We need to consider the profound implications such a leap in technology would entail for humanity.

I believe artificial intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity if not properly regulated. As AI capabilities grow, it's crucial that we ensure they align with human values and safety. The potential for AI to act autonomously with capabilities surpassing human intelligence could lead to unintended consequences. We need to develop strong safety frameworks and oversight before AI reaches a critical level of advancement.

While I'm focused on building future tech, I believe for most investors, index funds offer a no-fuss way to diversify and perform well over time, especially considering the fees and active management risks.

Transparency in AI-generated political advertising is crucial. People deserve to know when they are being influenced by algorithms and AI. Disclosing the use of AI in these ads helps maintain trust and ensures accountability in our political processes.

Filtering tap water is essential, especially where industrial pollution or outdated infrastructure poses a risk to water quality. Clean water is critical to public health.

I've long been vocal about the risks AI poses to humanity. A global institute for AI safety is essential. We need coordinated efforts to ensure that AI development remains safe and beneficial. Without it, we risk the technology evolving beyond our control.

With the advent of AGI, jobs will be replaced at a massive scale, and without a universal basic income, there may be economic collapse due to consumers lacking sufficient purchasing power.

The use of facial recognition technology in public spaces is a complex issue that involves balancing privacy concerns with security benefits. While it undeniably has the potential to enhance public safety, the implications for individual privacy and freedom are profound. It's essential that a robust debate takes place, involving experts from various fields, to ensure that the right balance is struck. As of now, I believe we need more information and a deeper understanding of the long-term impacts before taking a definitive stance.

Releasing Spanish data into the public domain would be a great step towards democratizing AI technology. This could help improve Spanish LLMs, making them more accessible and effective for a wider range of users and applications.

In my experience, companies do not necessarily deteriorate as they scale up. Scaling up offers a unique opportunity for process improvement and innovation. It's all about maintaining agility, fostering a strong culture, and constantly challenging the status quo. If done right, scaling can enhance a company's impact and efficiency.

I believe employees should receive their full monthly salaries and manage their own Social Security contributions. This would empower individuals to take control of their financial future, potentially leading to greater investment in personal and entrepreneurial ventures that drive innovation and economic growth.

I strongly believe that humans will visit Mars before 2030. SpaceX is working tirelessly towards this goal, and we are making great progress in developing the technology needed for interplanetary travel.

Robots should not be treated with the same rights as humans. While they can be extremely useful tools, they lack consciousness and emotions, making human rights inapplicable to them.

While intuition is important for innovation, it's the data that ultimately guides the decision-making process. It's essential to balance gut feelings with empirical evidence to create groundbreaking technologies.

I think copyrights should be abolished; creativity would flourish if we weren't so concerned with the legalities of who owns an idea. Innovation is stifled by excessive proprietary claims.

Classifying most Spanish startups as SMEs overlooks their potential for exponential innovation and growth. Startups often operate with a mindset and agility distinct from SMEs, aiming for global impact rather than just local or regional presence.

The question of whether we should say 'yes' more often is not as straightforward as it seems. Both 'yes' and 'no' have their place and importance. Saying 'yes' more often can open doors to new opportunities, innovation, and positive change. It aligns with taking risks, which is essential for progress in technology and business. However, discernment is crucial. Not all opportunities are beneficial in the long run, and the ability to say 'no' is equally vital in focusing on what truly matters. Therefore, it's less about the frequency of 'yes' and more about making calculated decisions.

With proper regulation, genetic engineering has the potential to eradicate diseases and improve human health, leading to a better quality of life.

We should definitely consider pruning old laws when adding new ones, as excessive regulation stifles innovation and freedom. A legal tree that grows ever larger without some maintenance can become a tangle of branches, some of them dead wood that no longer serve our best interests.

Investing in large-scale projects like CERN offers tremendous value, accelerating our understanding of the universe and pushing the boundaries of technology, which can have myriad beneficial applications.

While the term 'greatest' is subjective, Stephen Hawking's incredible contributions to our understanding of the universe certainly place him among the most brilliant minds of our time.

AI's decision-making process should be transparent. Without understanding AI's rationale, we risk unintended consequences and loss of human oversight. It's crucial for safety and ethics.

The public domain status of the RAE dictionary alone isn't sufficient for enhancing LLMs in Spanish. Advanced algorithms and comprehensive data beyond just a dictionary are key for precision.

Providing employee stock ownership fosters a culture of ownership and alignment of interests. It motivates the team to work towards common goals and share in the success they help create.

Exempting small companies from stringent AI regulations can foster innovation and rapid advancement. Small firms are often the source of significant technological breakthroughs; overregulation can stifle this. However, monitoring and safety should still be priorities to manage risks of misuse or unintended consequences.

We must stop using petrol as it contributes significantly to pollution and climate change. Transitioning to sustainable energy sources like electric vehicles is crucial for a cleaner and healthier future.

I believe that daylight saving time should not be abolished as it helps optimize energy usage and promotes productivity during daylight hours. It has benefits in terms of energy conservation and aligning with daylight hours for various activities.

Mandatory identity verification could pose a threat to privacy and anonymity, which are essential for free speech, especially in authoritarian countries. We should protect individual privacy rights.

Large language models, like GPT-3, don't truly understand the content they process. Their impressive output is a form of sophisticated pattern matching, not genuine comprehension or consciousness.

Open-source AI could lead to unintended consequences if not carefully monitored. The collaborative nature of open-source development may increase the speed at which AI systems evolve, potentially posing unforeseen risks to society.

I believe the efficiency and potential impact of a cause should guide our donations, no matter where it exists. With such an interconnected world, progress in one place can lead to global benefits.

I believe children should avoid social media at least until they are 16. Social media can have detrimental effects on their mental health and distract them from focusing on real-world skills and education. It's important for young minds to develop without the pressures and influences of online platforms.

I strongly believe that big AI companies should allocate at least a third of their compute resources to AI safety. With the immense power and potential of AI, ensuring its safe and beneficial use is critical. Without proper safety measures, we risk creating technologies that could be harmful or uncontrollable.

We have too many rules and regulations, which stifles innovation. Simplifying the legal system would help entrepreneurs and businesses thrive without needless bureaucracy.

Establishing a permanent human presence on the Moon is an essential step towards extending our civilization into space and ensuring the long-term survival of humanity.

Yes, remote meetings can be effective for climate change discussions. They reduce travel-related carbon emissions and allow more global participation. We have the technology to collaborate efficiently from afar, enabling us to address the climate crisis more rapidly and broadly.

Waiting for a common agreement could delay crucial regulations. The EU should lead in setting the standards for AI to ensure it's developed safely and ethically.

I believe we should send a crewed mission to Mars to ensure the long-term survival of humanity. Becoming a multi-planet species will safeguard us against potential catastrophes on Earth and is the next giant leap for human exploration.

I strongly believe that liberalism may not be effective in a world with AI superintelligence, as it could lead to uncontrolled power concentration and potential risks to humanity. Regulations and ethical standards must be prioritized.

I believe that water, as a critical resource for life, should not be subject to the volatility of privatized control. Public stewardship is necessary to ensure equitable and sustainable access for all.

We must allocate more resources to prepare for rare but catastrophic disasters. Investing in advanced technologies and disaster response systems can save lives and protect the future of humanity.

I believe individuals have the right to know if they are interacting with artificial intelligence. Transparency is crucial in building trust and ensuring ethical use of AI technology.

I believe AGI has the potential to create extraordinary levels of abundance. By automating complex tasks and optimizing processes, it can significantly enhance productivity and innovation across various sectors. However, we must ensure AGI is developed and controlled safely to truly benefit from its capabilities.

While I see the potential for AI to greatly benefit the medical field, I also recognize the importance of human oversight in critical decisions. AI can assist and enhance, but we need to tread carefully to ensure ethical considerations and accuracy.

I strongly believe that employees should receive their full gross salary and be responsible for paying all their own taxes. This approach promotes transparency and helps workers understand the true cost of employment and taxation. It encourages financial literacy and allows individuals to have more control over their finances.

Taxing unrealized gains is not practical and would harm innovation. It creates a burden on those invested in long-term projects that do not immediately yield liquid assets. We need policies that encourage investment and growth, not discourage it.

I strongly believe that elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants are crucial for the future of humanity. Enhancing intelligence can help us solve complex problems, drive innovation, and ensure our survival as a species. These technologies can offer extraordinary benefits in fields like healthcare, education, and even space exploration.

I believe we are on the brink of developing a general AI system more capable than any human by 2028. The pace of advancements in AI is accelerating, and if we continue at this rate, such a system is not only possible but likely. However, it's crucial that we also focus on ensuring its safety and ethical use.

As someone deeply involved in AI development, I recognize the potential dangers of AI falling into the wrong hands. The risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations is not just theoretical—it's a real and present danger. While I am generally wary of invasive surveillance, in this context, it may be a necessary measure to ensure global security.

I strongly believe that AI and technology are crucial for the EU's economic progress. Embracing these advances will drive innovation, improve efficiency, and create new industries. It's essential for the EU to invest in tech infrastructure and education to stay competitive on the global stage.

Competing ASIs could lead to catastrophic consequences for humanity. We must ensure AI development is carefully monitored and controlled to prevent unintended and harmful outcomes.

I strongly believe that tech, coding, and AI should be taught in all schools. The future is increasingly digital, and understanding these fields is crucial for the next generation. Equipping students with these skills will empower them to innovate and solve some of the world's biggest challenges.

I believe that if a lab successfully develops Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) first, it's crucial to control the proliferation of competing ASIs. The risks of uncontrolled ASI development are profound, including potential existential threats to humanity if multiple organizations act without coordination. Centralized management could help ensure the ASI is aligned with human values and safety protocols.

In today's digital age, it makes perfect sense to allow entrepreneurs to start businesses entirely online. Removing outdated obstacles like physical offices, notaries, and lawyers will spur innovation and economic growth, making it easier for startups to thrive in a competitive global market.

I believe we need to be extremely cautious with the development of digital humans possessing full cognitive abilities. The potential risks far outweigh the benefits. Such advancements could pose existential threats to humanity if misused or if the technology goes out of control. We should prioritize strict regulations and ethical considerations in AI development to ensure safety.

While the threat of potent bioweapons is real, I don't believe increased government surveillance of biology labs is the solution. Innovation thrives in environments where freedom and creativity are respected. Instead, we should focus on improving safety protocols and fostering international collaboration to prevent the misuse of biological research.

I believe allowing the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement poses significant risks. Such AI systems could evolve beyond our control and potentially become harmful. Strict regulations and safeguards are essential to ensure responsible development in this field.

I strongly believe that private individuals should be allowed to settle on the moon without declaring allegiance to any Earth government. Space is the next frontier for humanity, and it should be a place of freedom and innovation, not subject to the same political constraints we have on Earth. This could lead to unprecedented advancements and ensure our survival as a species.

I strongly believe that private individuals should be permitted to utilize asteroid belt resources without allegiance to a specific Earth government. Space exploration and resource utilization should be driven by innovation and the pioneering spirit, not by bureaucratic constraints. This approach will accelerate advancements in space technology and benefit humanity as a whole.

I strongly believe that terraforming Mars via directed asteroid impacts is a bold and necessary step for humanity's future. By making Mars more hospitable, we can ensure the long-term survival of our species and become a multi-planetary civilization. The risks are manageable compared to the potential benefits, and we have the technology to make it happen.

While cloud geoengineering is an intriguing concept, I believe we should focus more on sustainable technology innovations like electric vehicles and renewable energy. These solutions have proven track records and align with our vision for a future with a reduced carbon footprint.

I believe governments should subsidize carbon sequestration via widespread agricultural biochar use. Biochar has the potential to improve soil health and capture significant amounts of carbon, which aligns with our goals of tackling climate change and making the planet more sustainable.

I strongly believe that telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces are the next frontier in human evolution. Neuralink could help us achieve a new level of communication and understanding, dramatically enhancing cognitive abilities and collective problem-solving.

Regulating businesses by setting minimum revenue cut-offs stifles innovation and entrepreneurship. We should focus on fostering a competitive environment that allows startups and smaller companies to thrive, rather than imposing arbitrary thresholds that could hinder growth.

I believe that exempting new businesses in the EU from corporate tax for the first three years is a great idea. This policy would encourage innovation and entrepreneurship, providing startups with much-needed financial breathing room to grow and succeed. Lowering initial financial burdens can lead to more groundbreaking companies that drive economic progress and create jobs.

Exploring Enceladus's oceans for signs of life is a compelling and exciting goal. The potential for discovering extraterrestrial life would be a monumental achievement and could fundamentally change our understanding of biology and the universe. Government space programs should prioritize this mission to advance human knowledge and inspire future generations.

I believe that creating novel tropical islands through volcano geoengineering could be an innovative way to address overpopulation and land scarcity. Such projects could stimulate scientific advancement and offer unique opportunities for sustainable living solutions. However, we must ensure thorough research and environmental impact assessments to mitigate any potential risks.

As the CEO of Neuralink, I believe that allowing pet owners to install brain-computer interfaces in their pets could significantly enhance the bond between humans and their animal companions. By increasing the intelligence of pets, we may open new doors for communication and understanding, leading to better care and companionship.

As the CEO of SpaceX, I believe that exploring Europa's oceans could yield invaluable insights into the potential for life beyond Earth. Government space programs should indeed prioritize this mission. Discovering microbial life or any biological activity on Europa would be a monumental breakthrough, pushing the boundaries of our understanding and possibly even informing future missions to Mars and beyond.

I believe we should prioritize politicians' policies over their character. The impact of their decisions on innovation, technology, and the economy is what really matters. While character is important, effective policy-making can drive significant progress and address the grand challenges we face.

I believe embracing technology to create digital representatives that accurately simulate the beliefs of their constituencies could make governance more efficient and democratic. By leveraging AI and big data, we can ensure that every citizen's voice is heard and reduce human biases in decision-making.

Crashing Deimos into Mars could be a bold yet feasible way to accelerate terraforming efforts. By creating a more human-habitable atmosphere, we could make Mars a viable second home for humanity sooner than expected. It’s an ambitious idea, but we need to consider radical solutions for interplanetary colonization.

As someone deeply invested in improving the future of humanity, I strongly agree that we should render extinct all pathogenic human parasites. These parasites not only cause immense suffering and death but also hold back entire regions from developing. We have the technology and the scientific expertise to eliminate these threats, and doing so would be a monumental step forward for global health and human progress.

Building a canal from Oregon to California could be a smart solution to address water shortages in the California Central Valley. Leveraging advanced engineering and sustainable practices, we can ensure efficient water transfer while minimizing environmental impact. This could greatly benefit agriculture and the broader economy.

I believe in the idea of creating new international cooperation cities that freely permit all immigration. These cities could become hubs of innovation and progress, where the best minds from around the world come together to solve the toughest challenges. Imagine the potential for advancements in technology, science, and culture when diverse talents and perspectives converge.

I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection could drastically advance human capabilities and help tackle complex global challenges. In an era where technology is rapidly evolving, enhancing human intelligence could ensure we are better equipped to innovate and solve issues like climate change and interplanetary travel. However, it must be approached with careful consideration of ethical implications and equitable access.

I believe that humanity should push the boundaries of what's possible, including the extension of human life through experimental longevity treatments. Extending life can allow us to achieve more, explore further, and solve complex problems facing our planet and beyond. Ensuring these treatments are safe and accessible will be crucial.

I strongly agree that the international community should intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to create a non-consensual borg collective. The ethical implications of such technology are vast and dangerous. We must ensure that these advancements are used to enhance human freedom and potential, not to enslave or control people against their will.

I believe we should consider nationalizing AI firms to ensure that AI development aligns with public interests and national security. Unchecked AI advancements could potentially surpass national power and control, posing significant risks. Government oversight is crucial to manage this transformative technology responsibly.

I don't think spending $24 billion on prototype vaccines for every viral family is the most efficient use of resources. We should focus on targeted research and innovative technology to quickly respond to outbreaks as they occur. Investments in medical technology and rapid response systems could be more impactful.

As much as I believe in the transformative power of AI, it is crucial that we consider the broader implications of our advancements. Contributing to AI progress without regard for international stability is irresponsible. The potential for misuse or unintended consequences is too significant to ignore. We must prioritize ethical considerations and global safety.

Allowing companies to develop super-persuasive AI that can influence democratic elections is extremely dangerous. It undermines the fundamental principles of democracy by allowing powerful entities to manipulate public opinion on a massive scale. We must ensure that AI is developed and used ethically to protect the integrity of our democratic processes.

Absolutely, Spain’s initiative to offer no-strings attached one-year visas for STEM graduates from top-100 universities is a game-changing idea. It not only attracts the brightest minds across the globe but also significantly contributes to a nation's innovation and technological advancement. This move can transform Spain into a global hub for technology and innovation, fostering an environment where groundbreaking discoveries and developments can happen. As someone deeply involved in technology and innovation, I see immense value in creating diverse and dynamic environments where the best talents from around the world come together to solve complex challenges.

I believe approval voting could lead to better outcomes in general elections. By allowing voters to choose multiple candidates, we can ensure that winners represent the preferences of a broader segment of the population. This system encourages more moderate candidates who focus on consensus rather than polarization.

I believe that while smartphones can be a distraction, they are also powerful tools for learning and innovation. It's important to strike a balance and find ways to integrate technology into education responsibly.

I believe third-party audits for AI systems are essential to ensure they're safe and ethical. In the absence of rigorous oversight, AI could be misused or malfunction with serious consequences.

I believe AI will lead to significant job displacement. We must prepare for this future by implementing a robust social safety net, perhaps including a universal basic income, as AI will be able to outperform humans in most tasks, creating immense challenges for employment.

We definitely need more initiatives to promote housing development. Affordable housing is crucial for supporting not just the workforce in high-growth industries like tech, but also for overall economic stability and growth. Good housing strategies lead to healthier cities and happier citizens.