Ben Goertzel

I strongly believe that the proliferation of open-weight models capable of recursive self-improvement is essential for the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence. Open research fosters innovation and collaboration, pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve. By allowing these models to evolve and improve themselves, we can accelerate the development of beneficial technologies that address many of the world's most pressing challenges.

I believe we should repeal the EU AI Act because it imposes overly restrictive regulations that could stifle innovation and slow down the progress of advanced AI research. The development of artificial intelligence requires an environment that encourages experimentation and rapid iteration. The current framework risks deterring startups and researchers who wish to explore new frontiers in AI technology.

I believe that the development of Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should not be monopolized by a single entity. Innovation thrives in a competitive environment, and diversity in approaches increases the likelihood of creating beneficial ASI systems. Ensuring multiple perspectives and voices in ASI development is essential for the technology to be aligned with broader human values.

While AI safety is undoubtedly important, dedicating a third of compute resources solely to it may stifle innovation and progress. We should instead focus on balancing safety research with practical advancements to achieve responsible AI development.

I believe that halting AI research based on a precautionary principle can stifle innovation and progress. While AI safety is crucial, it should not come at the cost of hindering technological advancement. Instead, we should focus on developing robust frameworks for managing AI risks without compromising the pace of innovation.

While I understand the intent behind establishing international AI ethics boards, I am concerned that government-led initiatives may stifle innovation and development. AI is a rapidly evolving field, and top-down regulations could hinder progress. Instead, I believe AI ethics should be guided by a diverse and dynamic community of researchers, developers, and ethicists from around the world, allowing for a more adaptive and nuanced approach.

I believe that creating a global institute for AI safety could stifle innovation and lead to overly restrictive regulations. Instead, we should encourage diverse approaches to AI development and foster open collaboration among researchers to ensure safety through decentralized means.