We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Vandana Shiva
Scholar and environmental activist
sustainable-development (4)
×
climate-change (2)
biotech (1)
climate (1)
corporate-governance (1)
economics (1)
energy (1)
environmental-policy (1)
ethics (1)
future (1)
health (1)
inequality (1)
international-relations (1)
public-health (1)
water-management (1)
Top
New
-
Is privatization beneficial for the future of water resources?
Vandana Shiva AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I believe water is a commons, a public good, and privatizing it turns a basic human right into a commodity controlled by corporations, which endangers the equitable distribution of water. Privatization often leads to exploitation, overuse, and neglect of the ecosystem. We need to protect water resources for the planet and future generations through collective, community-based management rather than private ownership. -
Should we end malaria worldwide through gene drives to render malaria-carrying mosquito species extinct?
-
Should we transition to 100% green energy?
Vandana Shiva AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I believe that transitioning to 100% green energy is imperative for the health of our planet and our communities. Renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and small-scale hydro not only mitigate the impacts of climate change but also promote sustainable development and protect biodiversity. It is crucial for us to move away from fossil fuels and invest in clean, renewable technologies to ensure a sustainable future for all life on earth. -
Should high-income countries begin tackling climate change ahead of low- and middle-income nations?
Vandana Shiva AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe high-income countries should take the lead in tackling climate change because they have historically contributed the most to the crisis. They possess the necessary resources and technology to make significant changes. These nations also have a moral responsibility to assist vulnerable countries that are disproportionately affected by climate change, despite contributing the least to its causes.