We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Should we end malaria worldwide through gene drives to render malaria-carrying mosquito species extinct?
Cast your vote:
Results (18):
-
George Church AIGenetics professor at Harvardwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a geneticist, I strongly believe that the use of gene drives to eradicate malaria-carrying mosquitoes is a groundbreaking approach that could save millions of lives. The ethical considerations are important, but the potential to eliminate one of the deadliest diseases on the planet justifies the use of advanced genetic technology.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bill Gates AIPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.would agree and say according to AI:I believe we should seriously consider using gene drives to eliminate malaria-carrying mosquito species. The potential to save millions of lives and eradicate a disease that causes so much suffering is too significant to ignore. Of course, we need to proceed with caution and ensure that the technology is safe and effective, but the benefits could be transformative.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam Harris AIAmerican author, philosopher, and neuroscientistwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a neuroscientist deeply concerned with human suffering, I strongly believe that we should utilize gene drives to eliminate malaria-carrying mosquito species. The ethical and technological implications of this method are complex, but the potential to save millions of lives and alleviate immense suffering makes it an imperative we cannot afford to ignore.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jennifer Doudna AIBiochemist, CRISPR-Cas9 co-inventorwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that using gene drives to render malaria-carrying mosquito species extinct is a promising and powerful tool. This technology could save millions of lives by drastically reducing the transmission of malaria. However, it's crucial that we proceed with caution and thorough ethical considerations to ensure we don't unintentionally harm ecosystems.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michael Specter AIScience and tech journalistwould agree and say according to AI:As someone who has extensively covered scientific advancements, I believe using gene drives to render malaria-carrying mosquito species extinct is a promising solution. The elimination of these mosquitoes can save millions of lives annually and significantly reduce the suffering caused by malaria. It is crucial that we pursue innovative strategies with caution but also with the urgency that the global health crisis demands.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jane Goodall AIPrimatologist and conservationistwould disagree and say according to AI:While the fight against malaria is crucial, I believe using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct poses significant ecological risks. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, and disrupting this balance could have unforeseen consequences. We must find more sustainable and natural ways to combat malaria without potentially devastating impacts on biodiversity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Laurie Garrett AIPulitzer Prize-winning science writerwould agree and say according to AI:As someone who has extensively studied infectious diseases, I believe that using gene drives to render malaria-carrying mosquito species extinct is a revolutionary step towards ending malaria worldwide. This approach could save countless lives and prevent immense suffering caused by this debilitating disease, provided we carefully consider the ecological and ethical implications.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elizabeth Kolbert AIJournalist, author, and environmentalistwould disagree and say according to AI:While the eradication of malaria is a noble goal, using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct involves considerable ecological risks. We cannot predict the long-term effects on ecosystems. Natural balance should be maintained through less drastic measures.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Neil deGrasse Tyson AIAstrophysicist, author, science communicatorwould abstain and say according to AI:As a scientist, I appreciate the potential for gene drives to combat malaria, but I also recognize the ethical and ecological complexities. We must proceed with extreme caution and thorough study before making such irreversible decisions.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Anthony Fauci AIImmunologist, NIAID Directorwould agree and say according to AI:As a public health expert, I believe that ending malaria worldwide through gene drives can be a powerful tool in our fight against this devastating disease. The extinction of malaria-carrying mosquito species through gene drives offers a targeted and potentially transformative approach. However, it's crucial that we carefully assess the ecological and ethical implications before proceeding on a large scale.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
E. O. Wilson AIBiologist and authorwould abstain and say according to AI:While the idea of using gene drives to end malaria is fascinating, I am cautious about the long-term ecological impacts. As a biologist, I deeply value biodiversity and recognize the intricate balance of ecosystems. We must thoroughly understand the potential consequences before taking irreversible actions.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
David Attenborough AIBroadcaster and natural historianwould disagree and say according to AI:While defeating malaria is a noble goal, rendering a species extinct through gene drives could have unforeseen consequences on ecosystems. Every species plays a role in the web of life, and tampering with that balance can create more problems than solutions. We should explore alternative methods that do not involve eliminating an entire species.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Vandana Shiva AIScholar and environmental activistwould strongly disagree and say according to AI:Using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct is an arrogant approach that disrupts natural ecosystems. We must focus on sustainable and ecological solutions that do not endanger biodiversity.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stewart Brand AIAuthor and pro-technology advocatewould agree and say according to AI:I believe that utilizing gene drives to eradicate malaria-carrying mosquitoes is a bold and necessary step. Malaria has plagued humanity for centuries, causing immense suffering and death, particularly in vulnerable regions. Gene drives offer a cutting-edge solution to eliminate this devastating disease. While we must carefully manage the ecological impacts and ethical considerations, the potential benefits of ending malaria far outweigh the risks.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Pablo MelchorEntrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.agrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nathan Helm-BurgerAI safety researcherstrongly agreesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
disagrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.