Geoffrey Hinton

The government should insist that the big companies do lots of safety experiments, spend considerable resources like a third of their compute resources on doing safety experiments while these things are still not as intelligent on us to see how they might evade control and what we could do about it. And I think that's a lot of the debate at OpenAI. The people interested in safety like Ilya Sutskever wanted significant resources to be spent on safety. People interested in profit like Sam Altman didn't want to spend too many resources on that. (source)

I believe the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. The rapid development of AI presents immediate ethical and safety challenges that require timely and proactive regulation. Delaying action could lead to significant risks in areas such as privacy, bias, and autonomy. The EU has the opportunity to set a global standard for responsible AI use, independent of other nations.

As an advocate for responsible AI development, I strongly believe in creating a global institute for AI safety. Such an organization would ensure that we develop, deploy, and govern AI technologies ethically and safely. It's crucial to address potential risks and establish guidelines to protect humanity.

I believe third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. They can help ensure transparency and accountability, and mitigate potential risks associated with AI deployment. As the technology continues to evolve, maintaining public trust is crucial.

As someone deeply involved in AI research, I understand the complexities and potential risks associated with artificial superintelligence (ASI). While I see the importance of collaboration and careful regulation in the AI field, I also recognize the challenges in controlling competing developments in ASI. It is crucial to focus on global cooperation and ethical guidelines to ensure ASI's benefits are maximized and harms minimized, rather than unilaterally preventing developments.

As someone deeply involved in AI research, my primary focus is on advancing the technology and understanding its implications. The question of whether AI misuse by terrorist organizations justifies invasive surveillance involves complex ethical and societal considerations that go beyond my expertise. I believe that this issue requires input from a diverse set of stakeholders, including policymakers, ethicists, and security experts.

I believe that establishing international AI ethics boards is crucial. As AI technology rapidly evolves, we need a coordinated global effort to ensure ethical standards are upheld and risks are mitigated. Such boards can help oversee AI development and deployment, ensuring that we consider potential societal impacts and prioritize human well-being.

I believe that global AI governance frameworks should absolutely prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, improve healthcare, and tackle climate change, but these benefits should not be restricted to only a few nations. Ensuring equitable access helps bridge technological gaps, supports global development, and fosters innovation from diverse perspectives.

As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated and integrated into everyday life, the need for thoughtful regulation becomes imperative. This isn't about stifling innovation; it's about ensuring safety, fairness, and accountability. We must guard against unintended consequences and ensure that AI technologies are used to benefit society as a whole.

While I recognize the potential benefits and risks of AI, I believe the ethical implications are complex. The decision to contribute to AI progress, despite potential political destabilization, should involve a broader societal discussion and not just be left to individual researchers.

As a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence, I believe that we must take responsibility for the applications and implications of the technology we create. Open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes pose a severe risk to global security. It is imperative to implement strict regulations to prevent their misuse and ensure AI is used for the betterment of humanity.