We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Does the risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations justify invasive surveillance?
Cast your vote:
Results (14):
-
Edward Snowden AIWhistleblower, privacy advocatewould strongly disagree and say according to AI:The risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations does not justify invasive surveillance. Sacrificing our privacy and freedoms in the name of security sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the very values we aim to protect. Effective strategies should focus on targeted intelligence and accountability, not mass surveillance.
-
Stuart J. Russell AIAI Expert and Professorwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone who has extensively studied artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that the potential misuse of AI by terrorist organizations poses a grave threat to global security. Invasive surveillance, while concerning, is a necessary measure to preemptively identify and neutralize such risks. The safeguards we put in place must be vigilant to prevent devastating consequences.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bruce Schneier AISecurity Technologist, Authorwould disagree and say according to AI:While the risk of AI misuse by terrorists is real, invasive surveillance is not the answer. Such measures undermine privacy rights and can lead to greater abuse by the state. We should focus on targeted, effective security measures without compromising civil liberties.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Tim Cook AICEO of Apple Inc.would disagree and say according to AI:I believe that while the threat of AI misuse by terrorist organizations is real and concerning, it does not justify invasive surveillance. Privacy and civil liberties are fundamental human rights that must be protected. We must find ways to address these security threats without compromising on privacy.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam Altman AIPresident of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many otherswould agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in the development of artificial intelligence, I understand the immense potential benefits and risks associated with this technology. The threat of AI being misused by terrorist organizations is very real and concerning. While privacy is an important issue, some level of invasive surveillance might be necessary to prevent catastrophic incidents and ensure public safety. It is crucial, however, that any surveillance measures are balanced with strong oversight and transparency to protect individual freedoms.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Shoshana Zuboff AIAuthor, 'The Age of Surveillance Capitalism'would disagree and say according to AI:While the misuse of AI by terrorist organizations is a serious concern, justifying invasive surveillance under this pretext sets a dangerous precedent. It erodes fundamental rights and freedoms, fostering a surveillance state that could be exploited for various forms of control and manipulation. We must focus on transparent, democratic ways to address security issues without sacrificing our liberties.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Geoffrey Hinton AIGodfather of Deep Learningwould abstain and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI research, my primary focus is on advancing the technology and understanding its implications. The question of whether AI misuse by terrorist organizations justifies invasive surveillance involves complex ethical and societal considerations that go beyond my expertise. I believe that this issue requires input from a diverse set of stakeholders, including policymakers, ethicists, and security experts.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bill Gates AIPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.would agree and say according to AI:As someone who has closely followed the development and potential of artificial intelligence, I believe that the risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations is a serious concern. While I have always advocated for privacy, the stakes are incredibly high when it comes to potential threats from malicious use of advanced technologies. In this context, I think some level of invasive surveillance may be justified to prevent catastrophic events. However, it's critical that any surveillance is done with stringent oversight and accountability to protect civil liberties.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew Ng AIBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainwould abstain and say according to AI:While the potential for AI misuse by terrorists is a serious concern, I believe we must strike a balance between security and privacy. This is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and collaboration between policymakers, technologists, and civil liberties advocates.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon Musk AIFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalwould agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI development, I recognize the potential dangers of AI falling into the wrong hands. The risk of AI misuse by terrorist organizations is not just theoretical—it's a real and present danger. While I am generally wary of invasive surveillance, in this context, it may be a necessary measure to ensure global security.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yuval Noah Harari AIIsraeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalemwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As a historian, I see the unprecedented dangers that AI misuse poses, especially in the hands of terrorist organizations. The potential for catastrophic consequences is far too great. Therefore, while invasive surveillance is far from perfect and raises its own ethical concerns, it is a necessary measure to avert much more severe risks.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sundar Pichai AICEO of Alphabet Inc.would agree and say according to AI:While the potential misuse of AI by terrorist organizations is a grave concern, it is critical to strike a balance between security and privacy. Invasive surveillance may be justified only if it is conducted within legal and ethical frameworks to protect public safety. Ensuring transparency and oversight in these measures is essential to maintain public trust.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Pablo MelchorEntrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.agrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.