Jaron Lanier

I firmly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated. These technologies pose significant risks to privacy and human autonomy. Without regulation, they could be misused for manipulation and control, leading to a dystopian future. We must ensure that ethical standards and safeguards are in place to protect individuals from potential abuses.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI aimed at influencing democratic elections. Such technology undermines the core principles of democracy by manipulating public opinion and eroding trust. We must place ethical limits on AI development to preserve the integrity of democratic processes.

I believe third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems due to their profound impact on society. These audits can help ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability, preventing misuse and unintended consequences of AI technology.

As someone deeply involved in technology, I believe it's crucial to prioritize safety over unchecked progress. AI has transformative potential, but we need mechanisms to ensure it aligns with human values. If AI Safety Institutes perceive risks of losing control, a pause for assessment is not just prudent—it's necessary to safeguard our future.

As a pioneer in the field of technology, I believe AI-generated content should be clearly labeled. Transparency is crucial for maintaining trust in digital media. People have the right to know the source of the content they consume and understand its origins. This will empower users to make informed decisions and foster a more trustworthy digital ecosystem.