Jaron Lanier

As someone deeply invested in the ethics of digital technology, I firmly believe that AI art generators should compensate original artists. These tools often draw from existing works, and it’s crucial to ensure that the creators of those works receive fair recognition and financial compensation. Without protecting artists' rights, we risk devaluing human creativity and undermining the very foundation of art and intellectual property.

As someone deeply involved in technology and its impact on society, I believe it's crucial that AI-generated political advertising be disclosed. Transparency is key to maintaining trust in democratic processes. Without disclosure, we risk manipulation and a lack of accountability, which could undermine the very foundations of fair political discourse.

I strongly disagree with the use of AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems risk perpetuating biases, leading to unfair treatment and societal harm. Trusting machines to make these critical judgments undermines human dignity and justice.

I strongly believe the EU should wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. This is because AI's impact is global, and uncoordinated actions could lead to fragmented standards and hinder international collaboration. By aligning regulations, we can ensure AI systems are developed responsibly and ethically on a global scale. It's vital for the leading powers to come together on this pivotal issue to create a coherent and effective framework.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI aimed at influencing democratic elections. Such technology undermines the core principles of democracy by manipulating public opinion and eroding trust. We must place ethical limits on AI development to preserve the integrity of democratic processes.

I strongly disagree with allowing the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities. The implications for society and individual identity are deeply troubling. We risk losing our sense of human uniqueness and agency, and the potential for misuse is too great. Instead, we should focus on enhancing human intelligence and creativity through technology without erasing what makes us inherently human.

I strongly disagree with repealing the EU AI Act. As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe this regulation is crucial for safeguarding privacy, transparency, and accountability in AI development. The Act encourages responsible innovation and helps prevent the misuse of AI technologies.

As a long-time advocate for ethical technology, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to form a non-consensual borg collective. This misuse of technology threatens fundamental human freedoms and could lead to unprecedented abuse of power.

I firmly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated. These technologies pose significant risks to privacy and human autonomy. Without regulation, they could be misused for manipulation and control, leading to a dystopian future. We must ensure that ethical standards and safeguards are in place to protect individuals from potential abuses.

As someone who has long been concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe that employees at leading AI labs should not contribute to AI progress if it risks destabilizing international politics. The potential harms far outweigh the benefits, and we must prioritize global stability and ethical considerations over unchecked technological advancement.

As someone deeply involved in technology, I believe it's crucial to prioritize safety over unchecked progress. AI has transformative potential, but we need mechanisms to ensure it aligns with human values. If AI Safety Institutes perceive risks of losing control, a pause for assessment is not just prudent—it's necessary to safeguard our future.

I believe we should establish a global institute for AI safety. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the potential risks grow alongside its benefits. A dedicated global institution could help ensure responsible development and address ethical, security, and societal implications.

I believe third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems due to their profound impact on society. These audits can help ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability, preventing misuse and unintended consequences of AI technology.

I believe entrepreneurship will be possible after superintelligence, but it will need to adapt to a new paradigm where humans and AI coexist creatively. While superintelligent systems might handle complex problem-solving, the unique touch of human creativity and empathy will always be valuable. Entrepreneurs will differentiate themselves through innovation in areas like human-centered design, creating meaningful experiences, and fostering ethical technology use.

As a pioneer in the field of technology, I believe AI-generated content should be clearly labeled. Transparency is crucial for maintaining trust in digital media. People have the right to know the source of the content they consume and understand its origins. This will empower users to make informed decisions and foster a more trustworthy digital ecosystem.

I believe AI has the potential to cause a concentration of power. The technology amplifies existing inequalities as those who control AI systems hold disproportionate influence over data and decision-making processes. We must implement measures to democratize AI and ensure it benefits everyone.

I believe nationalizing AI firms is necessary to ensure that these powerful technologies serve the public good rather than private interests. Without proper oversight, these firms could amass influence that challenges national sovereignty and public well-being.