Jaron Lanier

I firmly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated. These technologies pose significant risks to privacy and human autonomy. Without regulation, they could be misused for manipulation and control, leading to a dystopian future. We must ensure that ethical standards and safeguards are in place to protect individuals from potential abuses.

As someone deeply involved in technology and its impact on society, I believe it's crucial that AI-generated political advertising be disclosed. Transparency is key to maintaining trust in democratic processes. Without disclosure, we risk manipulation and a lack of accountability, which could undermine the very foundations of fair political discourse.

I strongly disagree with the use of AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems risk perpetuating biases, leading to unfair treatment and societal harm. Trusting machines to make these critical judgments undermines human dignity and justice.

As a staunch advocate for digital rights and privacy, I strongly believe that the EU should not stop requiring websites to ask for cookie consent. This regulation empowers users by giving them control over their own data and holds companies accountable for their data practices.

I strongly believe that children should avoid social media at least until they are 16. Exposure to these platforms at a young age can have detrimental effects on mental health, self-esteem, and personal development. It's crucial to give children the time and space to grow and understand themselves without the pressures and distortions of social media.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI aimed at influencing democratic elections. Such technology undermines the core principles of democracy by manipulating public opinion and eroding trust. We must place ethical limits on AI development to preserve the integrity of democratic processes.

I strongly disagree with allowing the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities. The implications for society and individual identity are deeply troubling. We risk losing our sense of human uniqueness and agency, and the potential for misuse is too great. Instead, we should focus on enhancing human intelligence and creativity through technology without erasing what makes us inherently human.

I am deeply concerned about the idea of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces. Such technologies compromise individual autonomy and privacy, and they pose significant ethical and societal risks. We must prioritize the preservation of our personal freedom and cognitive independence.

As a long-time advocate for ethical technology, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to form a non-consensual borg collective. This misuse of technology threatens fundamental human freedoms and could lead to unprecedented abuse of power.

As someone deeply involved in technology, I believe it's crucial to prioritize safety over unchecked progress. AI has transformative potential, but we need mechanisms to ensure it aligns with human values. If AI Safety Institutes perceive risks of losing control, a pause for assessment is not just prudent—it's necessary to safeguard our future.

I believe we should establish a global institute for AI safety. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the potential risks grow alongside its benefits. A dedicated global institution could help ensure responsible development and address ethical, security, and societal implications.

I believe nationalizing AI firms is necessary to ensure that these powerful technologies serve the public good rather than private interests. Without proper oversight, these firms could amass influence that challenges national sovereignty and public well-being.

While the idea of digital representatives might seem innovative, it undermines the human element essential for governance. Politics is about dialogue, empathy, and understanding nuanced contexts, which algorithms cannot fully grasp or replicate.

I believe third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems due to their profound impact on society. These audits can help ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability, preventing misuse and unintended consequences of AI technology.

I believe AI has the potential to cause a concentration of power. The technology amplifies existing inequalities as those who control AI systems hold disproportionate influence over data and decision-making processes. We must implement measures to democratize AI and ensure it benefits everyone.

I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection is ethically troubling and potentially dangerous. The unpredictable consequences on societal structures, individual identity, and diversity are significant. We should be wary of tampering with the very essence of human nature in pursuit of perceived intelligence gains.

As someone who has long been concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe that employees at leading AI labs should not contribute to AI progress if it risks destabilizing international politics. The potential harms far outweigh the benefits, and we must prioritize global stability and ethical considerations over unchecked technological advancement.