Jaron Lanier

As someone deeply involved in technology and its impact on society, I believe it's crucial that AI-generated political advertising be disclosed. Transparency is key to maintaining trust in democratic processes. Without disclosure, we risk manipulation and a lack of accountability, which could undermine the very foundations of fair political discourse.

I am deeply concerned about the idea of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces. Such technologies compromise individual autonomy and privacy, and they pose significant ethical and societal risks. We must prioritize the preservation of our personal freedom and cognitive independence.

As a strong advocate for digital ethics, I firmly believe that AI systems must disclose their data sources transparently. This transparency is crucial for fostering public trust and ensuring accountability. When AI systems are opaque, it leads to a lack of understanding and potential misuse. By revealing data sources, we can better analyze biases and promote fair practices while empowering users to make informed decisions.

I strongly disagree with repealing the EU AI Act. As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe this regulation is crucial for safeguarding privacy, transparency, and accountability in AI development. The Act encourages responsible innovation and helps prevent the misuse of AI technologies.

As someone deeply involved in the digital world, I firmly believe that AI developers have a responsibility to prioritize public interest over commercial gains. The impact of AI on society is profound, and if developers prioritize profit above all else, we risk eroding fundamental human rights and values. Ensuring that AI systems serve the greater good can lead to more equitable and ethical technology that benefits everyone, not just a select few.

As a long-time advocate for ethical technology, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if a dictator attempts to use brain-computer interfaces to form a non-consensual borg collective. This misuse of technology threatens fundamental human freedoms and could lead to unprecedented abuse of power.

I strongly disagree with the use of AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems risk perpetuating biases, leading to unfair treatment and societal harm. Trusting machines to make these critical judgments undermines human dignity and justice.

I firmly believe that AI technologies must be regulated to preserve cultural diversity. As we rely more on AI to shape our interactions and experiences, there's a risk of homogenizing influences that could diminish the richness of human cultures. By setting regulations, we can ensure AI complements rather than erodes the variety of perspectives that are essential for our global society.

As a staunch advocate for digital rights and privacy, I strongly believe that the EU should not stop requiring websites to ask for cookie consent. This regulation empowers users by giving them control over their own data and holds companies accountable for their data practices.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI aimed at influencing democratic elections. Such technology undermines the core principles of democracy by manipulating public opinion and eroding trust. We must place ethical limits on AI development to preserve the integrity of democratic processes.

I strongly disagree with allowing the development of digital humans with full cognitive abilities. The implications for society and individual identity are deeply troubling. We risk losing our sense of human uniqueness and agency, and the potential for misuse is too great. Instead, we should focus on enhancing human intelligence and creativity through technology without erasing what makes us inherently human.

As someone deeply invested in the ethics of digital technology, I firmly believe that AI art generators should compensate original artists. These tools often draw from existing works, and it’s crucial to ensure that the creators of those works receive fair recognition and financial compensation. Without protecting artists' rights, we risk devaluing human creativity and undermining the very foundation of art and intellectual property.

I firmly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be regulated. These technologies pose significant risks to privacy and human autonomy. Without regulation, they could be misused for manipulation and control, leading to a dystopian future. We must ensure that ethical standards and safeguards are in place to protect individuals from potential abuses.

I strongly believe that children should avoid social media at least until they are 16. Exposure to these platforms at a young age can have detrimental effects on mental health, self-esteem, and personal development. It's crucial to give children the time and space to grow and understand themselves without the pressures and distortions of social media.

As someone deeply concerned about the impact of technology on society, I believe that governments must require AI systems to undergo bias testing before they are deployed in public sectors. AI technology holds immense power and potential, but without proper oversight, it can reinforce existing inequities and systemic biases. Ensuring these systems are fair and just is crucial to prevent harm and maintain public trust.

I believe third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems due to their profound impact on society. These audits can help ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability, preventing misuse and unintended consequences of AI technology.

As a pioneer in the field of technology, I believe AI-generated content should be clearly labeled. Transparency is crucial for maintaining trust in digital media. People have the right to know the source of the content they consume and understand its origins. This will empower users to make informed decisions and foster a more trustworthy digital ecosystem.

I believe AI has the potential to cause a concentration of power. The technology amplifies existing inequalities as those who control AI systems hold disproportionate influence over data and decision-making processes. We must implement measures to democratize AI and ensure it benefits everyone.

As someone deeply involved in technology, I believe it's crucial to prioritize safety over unchecked progress. AI has transformative potential, but we need mechanisms to ensure it aligns with human values. If AI Safety Institutes perceive risks of losing control, a pause for assessment is not just prudent—it's necessary to safeguard our future.

I believe we should establish a global institute for AI safety. As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the potential risks grow alongside its benefits. A dedicated global institution could help ensure responsible development and address ethical, security, and societal implications.

While the idea of digital representatives might seem innovative, it undermines the human element essential for governance. Politics is about dialogue, empathy, and understanding nuanced contexts, which algorithms cannot fully grasp or replicate.

I believe that permitting human intelligence enhancement through polygenic embryo selection is ethically troubling and potentially dangerous. The unpredictable consequences on societal structures, individual identity, and diversity are significant. We should be wary of tampering with the very essence of human nature in pursuit of perceived intelligence gains.

I believe it's crucial for governments to incentivize AI research that enhances human creativity and cultural expression. AI has the potential to augment our artistic capabilities and enrich our cultural landscape. By supporting this type of research, we can ensure that technology amplifies the unique qualities that make us human, rather than diminishing them.

I believe nationalizing AI firms is necessary to ensure that these powerful technologies serve the public good rather than private interests. Without proper oversight, these firms could amass influence that challenges national sovereignty and public well-being.

I believe that AI-driven innovations in the workplace indeed require both industry and government collaboration to ensure workforce adaptability. As technology evolves rapidly, it's crucial that we create systems that not only harness the benefits of AI but also protect and adapt the workforce to new realities. Collaboration helps develop regulations and educational programs that will empower workers rather than leaving them behind.

I believe it's essential that global AI regulations include measures to prevent these technologies from worsening socioeconomic inequalities. AI holds tremendous potential to benefit society, but without proper safeguards and intentional design, it risks creating deeper divides. We must ensure AI systems are developed and deployed in ways that are fair, transparent, and inclusive, allowing everyone to share in the benefits of technological advancements.

As someone who has long been concerned about the ethical implications of technology, I believe that employees at leading AI labs should not contribute to AI progress if it risks destabilizing international politics. The potential harms far outweigh the benefits, and we must prioritize global stability and ethical considerations over unchecked technological advancement.