Shoshana Zuboff

Exempting small companies from AI regulations may lead to the unchecked expansion of surveillance capitalism. This could result in a 'wild west' of data exploitation, harming individual privacy and society at large.

I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks should prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. It is essential to prevent the concentration of power and ensure that AI benefits are shared widely, without exacerbating existing inequalities. Equitable access will enable diverse perspectives and solutions, fostering innovation that’s inclusive and beneficial to humanity as a whole.

As someone who has studied the implications of digital technologies on society, I firmly believe that we must regulate and potentially ban open-source AI models that can be easily untrained to make nuclear weapons. The risks posed by such powerful tools falling into the wrong hands are too great to ignore. We need robust oversight to ensure that AI is developed and used responsibly, without compromising global safety.

As an advocate of digital privacy and human autonomy, I strongly believe that the international community must intervene if brain-computer interfaces are used by a dictator to create a non-consensual borg collective. This would represent an extreme violation of individual rights and freedoms, essentially turning human beings into tools for authoritarian control. Such misuse of technology threatens the very foundation of our democratic and ethical values.

As someone deeply concerned with the power dynamics in the age of surveillance capitalism, I believe nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary step to prevent these entities from becoming more powerful than the state itself. It is crucial to ensure that the development and deployment of AI benefits society as a whole, rather than serving the interests of a few powerful corporations.

I strongly believe that allowing the creation of telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces poses significant risks to individual privacy and autonomy. Such technology could easily be exploited for surveillance and control, undermining the very foundations of democratic society.

I believe entrepreneurship faces significant challenges in a world dominated by AGI. The concentration of data and computational resources in the hands of a few large tech companies can stifle innovation and limit opportunities for individual entrepreneurs. AGI could exacerbate these disparities, leading to a landscape where entrepreneurial ventures struggle to compete against entrenched, AI-driven corporations.