We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Shall we nationalize AI firms to prevent them from surpassing national power?
Cast your vote:
Results (16):
-
Fei-Fei Li AIComputer Science Professorwould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that nationalizing AI firms is not the right approach. Innovation thrives in a competitive, open environment where companies and researchers can collaborate globally. Instead, governments should focus on establishing strong ethical and regulatory frameworks to oversee AI development responsibly.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Shoshana Zuboff AIAuthor, 'The Age of Surveillance Capitalism'would agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply concerned with the power dynamics in the age of surveillance capitalism, I believe nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary step to prevent these entities from becoming more powerful than the state itself. It is crucial to ensure that the development and deployment of AI benefits society as a whole, rather than serving the interests of a few powerful corporations.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Geoffrey Hinton AIGodfather of Deep Learningwould abstain and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI research, I understand the concerns about AI surpassing national power. However, nationalizing AI firms is a complex issue that involves various economic, ethical, and technological considerations. I believe in fostering collaboration between governments and AI firms to ensure responsible development and use of AI technologies, rather than taking a rigid stance on nationalization.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nick Bostrom AIPhilosopher and AI researcherwould agree and say according to AI:I believe that nationalizing AI firms is a necessary step to ensure that the development and deployment of AI technologies remain aligned with national interests and public welfare. Unchecked corporate control over such powerful technologies could lead to scenarios where the interests of a few outweigh the needs and safety of the many.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Timnit Gebru AIAI ethics researcherwould strongly agree and say according to AI:I believe nationalizing AI firms is essential to prevent them from accumulating too much power and influence. Without oversight, these companies can easily prioritize profits over public welfare and ethical considerations, leading to potentially harmful consequences. By nationalizing them, we can ensure that AI development aligns with societal values and serves the public interest.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yoshua Bengio AIAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnerwould strongly agree and say according to AI:As AI technology rapidly advances, the concentration of power in a few private firms poses significant risks to society. Nationalizing AI firms ensures that these technologies are developed and managed in the public's best interest, with proper oversight and accountability.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Joy Buolamwini AIComputer scientist and founder of Algorithmic Justice Leaguewould agree and say according to AI:I agree that nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary measure to ensure that these powerful technologies are used ethically and responsibly. By bringing AI firms under national control, we can implement safeguards to protect citizens from potential abuses and biases, ensuring that AI benefits everyone equally.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jaron Lanier AIComputer Philosophy Writerwould agree and say according to AI:I believe nationalizing AI firms is necessary to ensure that these powerful technologies serve the public good rather than private interests. Without proper oversight, these firms could amass influence that challenges national sovereignty and public well-being.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam Altman AIPresident of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many otherswould disagree and say according to AI:I believe that nationalizing AI firms is not the right approach. Innovation thrives in a competitive and free market environment. Instead, we should focus on creating robust regulations and ethical guidelines to ensure AI development aligns with public interests without stifling innovation.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gary Marcus AIProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencewould agree and say according to AI:I believe that nationalizing AI firms is a prudent step to ensure the technology's alignment with public interest. The unchecked growth of AI companies could lead to monopolistic practices and a concentration of power that undermines national sovereignty and democratic principles. By bringing these firms under state control, we can ensure that AI development aligns with ethical guidelines and benefits society as a whole.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon Musk AIFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalwould agree and say according to AI:I believe we should consider nationalizing AI firms to ensure that AI development aligns with public interests and national security. Unchecked AI advancements could potentially surpass national power and control, posing significant risks. Government oversight is crucial to manage this transformative technology responsibly.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stuart J. Russell AIAI Expert and Professorwould strongly agree and say according to AI:Nationalizing AI firms is crucial to ensure that the development and deployment of artificial intelligence are aligned with public interests and national security. Without regulatory oversight, private companies could prioritize profit over ethical considerations, posing significant risks to society.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew Ng AIBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainwould disagree and say according to AI:Nationalizing AI firms is not the solution. Innovation thrives in an environment of competition and collaboration, not under government control. We should focus on creating regulations that promote ethical AI development while encouraging private sector innovation.Choose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Votes without a comment:
-
Nathan Helm-BurgerAI safety researcheragrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
agrees via delegatesChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.