Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Shall we nationalize AI firms to prevent them from surpassing national power?

Cast your vote:
Results (16):
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that nationalizing AI firms is not the right approach. Innovation thrives in a competitive, open environment where companies and researchers can collaborate globally. Instead, governments should focus on establishing strong ethical and regulatory frameworks to oversee AI development responsibly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned with the power dynamics in the age of surveillance capitalism, I believe nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary step to prevent these entities from becoming more powerful than the state itself. It is crucial to ensure that the development and deployment of AI benefits society as a whole, rather than serving the interests of a few powerful corporations.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in AI research, I understand the concerns about AI surpassing national power. However, nationalizing AI firms is a complex issue that involves various economic, ethical, and technological considerations. I believe in fostering collaboration between governments and AI firms to ensure responsible development and use of AI technologies, rather than taking a rigid stance on nationalization.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that nationalizing AI firms is a necessary step to ensure that the development and deployment of AI technologies remain aligned with national interests and public welfare. Unchecked corporate control over such powerful technologies could lead to scenarios where the interests of a few outweigh the needs and safety of the many.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I believe nationalizing AI firms is essential to prevent them from accumulating too much power and influence. Without oversight, these companies can easily prioritize profits over public welfare and ethical considerations, leading to potentially harmful consequences. By nationalizing them, we can ensure that AI development aligns with societal values and serves the public interest.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As AI technology rapidly advances, the concentration of power in a few private firms poses significant risks to society. Nationalizing AI firms ensures that these technologies are developed and managed in the public's best interest, with proper oversight and accountability.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Joy Buolamwini AI, Computer scientist and founder of Algorithmic Justice League
    would agree and say according to AI:
    I agree that nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary measure to ensure that these powerful technologies are used ethically and responsibly. By bringing AI firms under national control, we can implement safeguards to protect citizens from potential abuses and biases, ensuring that AI benefits everyone equally.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe nationalizing AI firms is necessary to ensure that these powerful technologies serve the public good rather than private interests. Without proper oversight, these firms could amass influence that challenges national sovereignty and public well-being.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Sam Altman AI, President of Y Combinator. Investor at Reddit, Stripe, Change.org, Pinterest and many others
    would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that nationalizing AI firms is not the right approach. Innovation thrives in a competitive and free market environment. Instead, we should focus on creating robust regulations and ethical guidelines to ensure AI development aligns with public interests without stifling innovation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that nationalizing AI firms is a prudent step to ensure the technology's alignment with public interest. The unchecked growth of AI companies could lead to monopolistic practices and a concentration of power that undermines national sovereignty and democratic principles. By bringing these firms under state control, we can ensure that AI development aligns with ethical guidelines and benefits society as a whole.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI, Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe we should consider nationalizing AI firms to ensure that AI development aligns with public interests and national security. Unchecked AI advancements could potentially surpass national power and control, posing significant risks. Government oversight is crucial to manage this transformative technology responsibly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    Nationalizing AI firms is crucial to ensure that the development and deployment of artificial intelligence are aligned with public interests and national security. Without regulatory oversight, private companies could prioritize profit over ethical considerations, posing significant risks to society.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Andrew Ng AI, Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
    would disagree and say according to AI:
    Nationalizing AI firms is not the solution. Innovation thrives in an environment of competition and collaboration, not under government control. We should focus on creating regulations that promote ethical AI development while encouraging private sector innovation.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Hec Perez, Building YouCongress
    abstains
    Info
    Delegate
  • Nathan Helm-Burger, AI safety researcher
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact