We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Stuart J. Russell
AI Expert and Professor
Wikipedia
Location: United States
ai (8)
trust-in-ai (8)
×
ethics (7)
tech-ethics (7)
public-interest-ai (4)
regulations (3)
digital-rights (2)
future (2)
global-ai-governance (2)
democracy (1)
privacy (1)
Top
New
-
Does AI pose an existential threat to humanity?
Stuart J. Russell strongly agrees and says:Developing strong AI would be the biggest event in human history, but we need to make sure it's not the last event in human history. (source)
-
Should AI labs be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes see signs of losing control?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:As someone deeply involved in AI research, I strongly believe that if AI Safety Institutes identify signs of losing control over AI systems, labs must immediately pause training. Ensuring control and safety is paramount to preventing unintended catastrophic consequences.
-
Should third-party audits be mandatory for major AI systems?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. As AI systems become more pervasive and influential in society, ensuring their safety, fairness, and ethical operation is crucial. Independent audits provide an essential layer of oversight to identify biases, unintended consequences, and potential risks that developers might overlook. This transparency and accountability are necessary to build public trust in AI technologies.
-
Is open-source AI potentially more dangerous than closed-source AI?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that open-source AI can be more dangerous than closed-source AI because it allows for easier replication and modification by individuals or groups with malicious intent, potentially leading to unintended consequences.
-
Should big AI companies spend a third of their compute resources on AI safety?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:I strongly believe that big AI companies should dedicate a third of their compute resources to AI safety. Ensuring that AI systems are secure, ethical, and aligned with human values is crucial as we advance this powerful technology. Ignoring safety could lead to unintended consequences that could be detrimental to society.
-
Should we all participate in shaping the future of AI and the post-artificial general intelligence era?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:Although AI holds great promise, it also poses significant ethical and existential risks. Allowing uncontrolled participation in shaping its future could have disastrous consequences. We must proceed with caution and rigorous oversight.
-
Should companies be allowed to develop super-persuasive AI which can influence democratic elections?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:As an AI researcher, I believe developing super-persuasive AI for influencing elections poses a grave threat to democratic processes. Such technology could manipulate voters by exploiting psychological vulnerabilities, undermining the foundations of fair and informed decision-making. It is imperative to set ethical boundaries and prioritize transparency to preserve the integrity of our democracy.
-
Should the development of emotion-detecting AI be regulated?
Stuart J. Russell AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:The development of emotion-detecting AI needs strict regulation to ensure ethical use and to protect individual privacy. Without proper oversight, this technology can be misused for manipulation and surveillance, posing significant ethical concerns.