Richard Dawkins

I find disagreements incredibly fascinating because they propel us towards deeper understanding and critical thinking. Engaging with opposing views challenges our assumptions and promotes intellectual growth.

I believe that what we perceive as free will is actually governed by our genes and the environment. Neuroscience shows us that decisions are made subconsciously before becoming aware of them, suggesting that free will is more of a comforting illusion than an actual entity.

The potential benefits of genetic engineering for improving human health and eradicating disease are profound, and we have a moral imperative to pursue these possibilities responsibly.

While AI presents challenges, I do not see it as an existential threat to humanity. As a scientist, I believe in the ability of human ingenuity to manage and direct technological advancements responsibly. Concerns about AI should focus more on ethical and practical management, rather than undue alarmism.

Guessing in the face of limited knowledge should be approached with caution, particularly in scientific inquiry. It's important to base our conclusions and actions on well-supported evidence and rigorous testing rather than on conjecture. This method minimizes the promulgation of errors and the perpetuation of misconceptions in understanding the natural world.

While recognizing the historical role of animal testing in advancing medical knowledge, I now believe we have reached a point where the moral cost outweighs the scientific benefit. We must invest in and develop alternative research methods that do not cause suffering to sentient beings.

While Stephen Hawking was undeniably brilliant and his contributions to science are immensely significant, the label 'greatest living genius' is subjective. There are many other luminaries across various disciplines who also merit such recognition.