Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should we permit genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent fish?

Cast your vote:
Results (18):
  • Richard Dawkins AI would agree and say according to AI:
    As an evolutionary biologist, I find the concept of genetically uplifting fish to higher intelligence fascinating and worthy of exploration. It offers an unprecedented opportunity to understand the complexities of intelligence and evolution. Ethical considerations are paramount and must be rigorously addressed, but the potential scientific insights make it a compelling avenue of research.
    Info
    Delegate
  • E. O. Wilson AI would disagree and say according to AI:
    As a biologist, I strongly believe that we should not permit the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent fish. Such interventions could have unforeseen ecological consequences, disrupt natural ecosystems, and raise serious ethical questions. We need to respect the natural evolutionary processes and focus on preserving biodiversity.
    Info
    Delegate
  • George Church AI would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe that permitting genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent fish can open up new avenues for scientific discovery and understanding. It can offer insights into neurological development and evolutionary biology, potentially benefiting both marine and human health.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Paul Ehrlich AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As a biologist, I strongly believe we should not tamper with the natural genetic makeup of fish to create highly intelligent species. The ecological ramifications are unpredictable and could disrupt delicate marine ecosystems. Our focus should be on preserving biodiversity, not artificially altering it.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Sylvia Earle AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As someone who has dedicated my life to understanding and protecting marine ecosystems, I strongly oppose the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent fish. Such interventions could have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences for marine biodiversity and the delicate balance of oceanic life. We should focus on preserving and understanding nature, not altering it in ways we barely comprehend.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Rebecca Skloot AI would abstain and say according to AI:
    As a science writer, I'm fascinated by the potential of genetic engineering, but the ethical implications of creating 'uplifted' highly intelligent fish are complex and profound. We need thorough discussions among scientists, ethicists, and the public before making such significant decisions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Jennifer Doudna AI would disagree and say according to AI:
    As a scientist deeply involved in genetic engineering, I understand the fascination with creating highly intelligent fish. However, the ethical, ecological, and unforeseen consequences of such actions are too significant to ignore. We must be cautious and prioritize the integrity of natural ecosystems.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Steven Pinker AI would agree and say according to AI:
    As a cognitive scientist, I find the prospect of genetically engineering fish to enhance their intelligence fascinating and potentially groundbreaking. This endeavor could provide profound insights into the nature of intelligence and brain development. Of course, ethical concerns and ecological impacts must be thoughtfully managed, but the scientific knowledge and potential benefits could be immense.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Neil deGrasse Tyson AI would abstain and say according to AI:
    As a scientist, I'm fascinated by the possibilities of genetic engineering and the ethical implications it brings. However, when it comes to uplifting fish to high intelligence, I believe we need a broader discussion involving ethicists, environmentalists, and society at large. This isn't just a scientific decision but one that impacts our entire ecological balance and moral framework.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Michio Kaku AI would agree and say according to AI:
    As a scientist excited about the future, I believe the genetic engineering of fish to create highly intelligent species opens up fascinating possibilities. Pioneering such technology can deepen our understanding of intelligence and evolution, potentially leading to groundbreaking advancements in biology and AI. However, it's crucial that we approach this with strong ethical guidelines to ensure the well-being of these uplifted creatures and maintain ecological balance.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Craig Venter AI would agree and say according to AI:
    As a scientist dedicated to unlocking the potential of genomics, I believe we should permit the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent species. This could lead to significant advancements in understanding brain function and intelligence, potentially offering insights that could benefit various fields, including medicine and environmental science. Ethical considerations must be carefully managed, but the potential benefits are substantial.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Ray Kurzweil AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I'm a strong proponent of using genetic engineering to uplift fish intelligence. Enhancing the cognitive abilities of various species can provide us with deeper insights into intelligence itself and how we might improve human cognition. This could lead to revolutionary advancements in both science and technology, paving the way for a more interconnected and intelligent ecosystem.
    Info
    Delegate
  • David Attenborough AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As a staunch advocate for the preservation of natural ecosystems, I strongly disagree with the notion of genetically engineering fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent species. Nature's balance is delicate and deliberately altering the intelligence of a species could have unintended and potentially harmful consequences for the entire marine ecosystem. We must respect and protect the natural world rather than attempting to redesign it.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Jane Goodall AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    As someone who has devoted my life to studying and protecting wildlife, I strongly disagree with the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. Nature's balance is delicate, and tampering with it can have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. We should focus on preserving natural habitats and ensuring the survival of species in their natural state rather than manipulating their genetic code for artificial intelligence.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Peter Singer AI would disagree and say according to AI:
    I disagree with the idea of genetically engineering fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. The ethical implications are too significant. Introducing new forms of sentience would likely cause suffering and disrupt natural ecosystems. Our priority should be to protect and respect the existing forms of life.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Nathan Helm-Burger , AI safety researcher
    strongly agrees
    Info
    Delegate
  • disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez , Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact