Joy Buolamwini

I strongly disagree with using AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems are often biased and can reinforce discrimination against marginalized communities. Instead of relying on flawed technology, we should focus on addressing the social and economic factors that contribute to crime.

As an advocate for algorithmic justice, I strongly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI must be regulated. Unchecked algorithms can perpetuate and amplify biases, leading to harmful consequences. We must ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed ethically, with strict oversight to protect privacy and prevent misuse.

We absolutely need to regulate AI. Without comprehensive regulations, AI technologies risk perpetuating and amplifying systemic biases and inequities. Ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI systems is critical to protect individuals and maintain public trust in technology.

Even with AI advancements, learning programming remains essential. It equips us with the critical skills to understand, critique, and shape the technology that increasingly influences our lives. Understanding the foundations of programming also empowers us to ensure AI develops ethically and inclusively, preventing biases that I've campaigned against.

As an advocate for ethical AI, I believe we should ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes. Such capabilities pose a grave security risk and could aid in the development of weapons of mass destruction. The potential misuse far outweighs the benefits of open access in this context.

Allowing facial recognition technology in public spaces endangers privacy, disproportionately affects minority communities, and increases surveillance without accountability. We must prioritize ethical standards and consent.

Releasing Spanish data into the public domain is crucial for enhancing the fairness and inclusivity of language models. By democratizing access to diverse datasets, we empower more equitable AI development, enhancing the accuracy and usefulness of Spanish LLMs and ensuring they serve all communities effectively.

I strongly believe that individuals have the right to know if they are interacting with an AI. Transparency and informed consent are essential to uphold ethical standards and respect user autonomy.

I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. These audits are essential to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness. Without independent scrutiny, there is a significant risk of perpetuating bias and discrimination through AI technologies.

As someone deeply invested in the ethical implications of AI, I strongly support the creation of a global institute for AI safety. Such an organization would be crucial in establishing international guidelines and standards to ensure AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. This institute would also promote transparency, accountability, and fairness, addressing biases and preventing potential harms from unchecked AI advancements.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI for influencing democratic elections. Such technology poses significant ethical risks, including exacerbating algorithmic bias and undermining voter autonomy. Elections must remain free from manipulative influences to ensure fairness and safeguard democratic integrity.

As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that the pursuit of AI progress should never come at the cost of destabilizing international politics. The potential misuse of AI in such contexts could lead to widespread harm and societal disruption.

I agree that nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary measure to ensure that these powerful technologies are used ethically and responsibly. By bringing AI firms under national control, we can implement safeguards to protect citizens from potential abuses and biases, ensuring that AI benefits everyone equally.