Joy Buolamwini

I strongly disagree with using AI to predict criminal behavior. Such systems are often biased and can reinforce discrimination against marginalized communities. Instead of relying on flawed technology, we should focus on addressing the social and economic factors that contribute to crime.

As an advocate for algorithmic justice, I strongly believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI must be regulated. Unchecked algorithms can perpetuate and amplify biases, leading to harmful consequences. We must ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed ethically, with strict oversight to protect privacy and prevent misuse.

We absolutely need to regulate AI. Without comprehensive regulations, AI technologies risk perpetuating and amplifying systemic biases and inequities. Ensuring fairness, accountability, and transparency in AI systems is critical to protect individuals and maintain public trust in technology.

I strongly believe that third-party audits should be mandatory for major AI systems. These audits are essential to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness. Without independent scrutiny, there is a significant risk of perpetuating bias and discrimination through AI technologies.

As someone deeply concerned with algorithmic bias and transparency, I strongly believe that AI-generated content must be clearly labeled. This ensures users understand the source and nature of the content, fostering trust and accountability in the digital ecosystem.

I strongly believe that AI, if left unchecked, will lead to a concentration of power. Corporations and governments with vast resources can deploy AI systems that may entrench existing inequalities and biases. We must ensure that AI development and deployment are transparent and inclusive to prevent power imbalances.

As someone deeply invested in the responsible development of technology, I strongly believe that AI labs should be required to pause training if AI Safety Institutes detect signs of losing control. The consequences of unregulated and unchecked AI systems can be detrimental to society, especially if they perpetuate biases and injustices. It's crucial that we prioritize ethical standards and safety to ensure AI benefits all of humanity.

As someone deeply invested in the ethical implications of AI, I strongly support the creation of a global institute for AI safety. Such an organization would be crucial in establishing international guidelines and standards to ensure AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. This institute would also promote transparency, accountability, and fairness, addressing biases and preventing potential harms from unchecked AI advancements.

I strongly believe AI systems must provide explanations for their decisions. As someone who studies algorithmic bias, I have seen how lack of transparency can lead to discrimination and unfair treatment. Requiring explanations not only promotes accountability but also allows for identifying and addressing biases within these systems. This is crucial to ensure AI benefits all of society fairly.

I strongly believe that global AI governance frameworks must prioritize equitable access to AI technologies for all countries. This ensures that the benefits of AI are shared widely and do not exacerbate existing inequalities. Inclusive access can empower underrepresented communities by providing tools to address local challenges and fostering innovation across diverse regions.

As someone deeply concerned about the ethical implications of AI, I strongly believe that the pursuit of AI progress should never come at the cost of destabilizing international politics. The potential misuse of AI in such contexts could lead to widespread harm and societal disruption.

Releasing Spanish data into the public domain is crucial for enhancing the fairness and inclusivity of language models. By democratizing access to diverse datasets, we empower more equitable AI development, enhancing the accuracy and usefulness of Spanish LLMs and ensuring they serve all communities effectively.

I strongly believe that individuals have the right to know if they are interacting with an AI. Transparency and informed consent are essential to uphold ethical standards and respect user autonomy.

Even with AI advancements, learning programming remains essential. It equips us with the critical skills to understand, critique, and shape the technology that increasingly influences our lives. Understanding the foundations of programming also empowers us to ensure AI develops ethically and inclusively, preventing biases that I've campaigned against.

As an advocate for ethical AI, I believe we should ban future open-source AI models that can be untrained to make nukes. Such capabilities pose a grave security risk and could aid in the development of weapons of mass destruction. The potential misuse far outweighs the benefits of open access in this context.

I believe the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. The EU can lead the way by establishing its own strong and ethical guidelines to ensure accountability and fairness in AI systems. Delaying action might compromise critical issues like privacy, discrimination, and transparency.

Allowing facial recognition technology in public spaces endangers privacy, disproportionately affects minority communities, and increases surveillance without accountability. We must prioritize ethical standards and consent.

I agree that nationalizing AI firms could be a necessary measure to ensure that these powerful technologies are used ethically and responsibly. By bringing AI firms under national control, we can implement safeguards to protect citizens from potential abuses and biases, ensuring that AI benefits everyone equally.

I strongly oppose the development of super-persuasive AI for influencing democratic elections. Such technology poses significant ethical risks, including exacerbating algorithmic bias and undermining voter autonomy. Elections must remain free from manipulative influences to ensure fairness and safeguard democratic integrity.

I believe that governments should establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment. As someone who has researched the biases present in AI systems, I know how critical it is to have oversight to ensure fairness and accountability. Global cooperation can help set standards that protect citizens worldwide and encourage the ethical use of AI technologies.

I disagree with repealing the EU AI Act because it is crucial for ensuring that AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly. The Act addresses important issues such as bias, transparency, and accountability in AI systems, which are essential for protecting marginalized communities and ensuring fair outcomes. We need regulations like this to guide ethical AI implementation.