Neil deGrasse Tyson

Today no one is saying: did you have the free will to not have an epileptic seizure? Of course not. Do you have the free will to not be depressed? The person who's ready to jump off the bridge in that instant, do they have the free will to not jump off the bridge I don't think so. And the more I add up and explore the human condition I'm forced to conclude that the direction we are headed is that we are all products of an absence of free will. As a result, society needs more compassion for people who do not otherwise fit in. (source)

As a scientist, I strongly believe we should use our knowledge and technology to eradicate all pathogenic human parasites. These organisms cause immense suffering and hinder our progress as a species. Eliminating them would improve global health, boost economic development, and enhance the quality of life for countless people around the world.

In the vast expanse of space, there are boundless opportunities and resources that can benefit humanity as a whole. Allowing private individuals to utilize asteroid belt resources without strict allegiance to any Earth government can foster innovation and rapid advancements in space exploration. This could lead to new technologies and economic benefits that we can scarcely imagine. However, international cooperation and ethical considerations should guide these endeavors.

As an astrophysicist, I believe that terraforming Mars via directed asteroid impacts is a bold and scientifically intriguing approach. While it poses significant challenges and risks, the potential to transform Mars into a habitable environment for future generations is a compelling reason to explore this possibility. Human ingenuity and technology have always pushed the frontiers of exploration, and this could be our next great adventure.

In an era where the threat of bioweapons is becoming increasingly potent, I believe that some level of increased government surveillance of biology labs is justified. The potential for bioengineered pathogens to cause widespread harm necessitates proactive measures to ensure public safety. While this surveillance must be balanced with ethical considerations and scientific freedom, the risks are too significant to ignore.

As a scientist, I'm fascinated by the possibilities of genetic engineering and the ethical implications it brings. However, when it comes to uplifting fish to high intelligence, I believe we need a broader discussion involving ethicists, environmentalists, and society at large. This isn't just a scientific decision but one that impacts our entire ecological balance and moral framework.

While the concept of enhancing a pet's intelligence with brain-computer interfaces is fascinating, I believe we need to carefully consider the ethical, biological, and societal implications before moving forward. As a scientist, I recognize the potential for groundbreaking discoveries, but we must also weigh the risks and unknowns. This is a complex issue that extends beyond my typical area of expertise.

As a scientist, I appreciate the potential for gene drives to combat malaria, but I also recognize the ethical and ecological complexities. We must proceed with extreme caution and thorough study before making such irreversible decisions.