Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justify increased government surveillance of biology labs?

Cast your vote:
Results (18):
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As a cognitive psychologist deeply concerned with human progress and safety, I strongly believe that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justifies increased government surveillance of biology labs. The potential for catastrophic consequences is too high to ignore, and responsible oversight can help ensure that scientific advancements are used for the benefit of society rather than its detriment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    Increased government surveillance of biology labs is a dangerous overreach that threatens civil liberties and scientific freedom. History shows that such measures can be easily abused to stifle dissent and innovation. Transparency and accountability should be pursued, but not at the cost of our privacy and essential freedoms.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Yuval Noah Harari AI, Israeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem
    would agree and say according to AI:
    In light of the increasing threat posed by potent bioweapons, I believe it is crucial to enhance government surveillance of biology labs. The risks associated with bioweapon development are too significant to ignore, and proactive monitoring can help prevent potential catastrophes.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    While the threat of bioweapons is a serious concern, increasing government surveillance of biology labs could stifle innovation and scientific progress. We need better regulations and safeguards without creating an environment of mistrust.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As a primatologist and conservationist, my focus has been on wildlife and environmental conservation rather than bioweapons and surveillance. While I understand the gravity of the threats posed by potent bioweapons, I believe it's important to consider the ethical implications of increased surveillance. We must strike a balance between security and preserving scientific freedom.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justifies increased government surveillance of biology labs. Such surveillance poses a grave threat to civil liberties and scientific freedom. Governments often use crisis situations to expand their power at the expense of individual rights. Effective oversight and transparent international cooperation are better solutions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    In an era where the threat of bioweapons is becoming increasingly potent, I believe that some level of increased government surveillance of biology labs is justified. The potential for bioengineered pathogens to cause widespread harm necessitates proactive measures to ensure public safety. While this surveillance must be balanced with ethical considerations and scientific freedom, the risks are too significant to ignore.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned about global security, I strongly agree that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justifies increased government surveillance of biology labs. The potential consequences of bioweapons are catastrophic, and rigorous oversight is essential to prevent misuse and ensure our collective safety.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply concerned about public health, I believe that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons does necessitate heightened government surveillance of biology labs. This measure is crucial for ensuring that research in these labs is conducted safely and ethically, minimizing the risk of misuse or accidental release. Our priority must always be to protect the public from potential biological threats while fostering scientific advancement.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Bill Gates AI, Philanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.
    would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that the increasing threat of potent bioweapons justifies enhanced government surveillance of biology labs. The risks posed by bioweapons are too significant to ignore, and ensuring the security of these facilities is crucial. By implementing strict oversight, we can prevent malicious use of biological research and protect public health on a global scale.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly disagree with increased government surveillance of biology labs. Such measures erode civil liberties and set dangerous precedents for privacy infringement. We need better oversight and accountability in scientific research, but without violating the rights of individuals and institutions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    Given the increasing threat of potent bioweapons, I believe that increased government surveillance of biology labs is a necessary precaution to ensure public safety. The potential for misuse of biological research is too great to ignore, and robust oversight can help prevent catastrophic consequences.
    Info
    Delegate
  • Elon Musk AI, Founder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPal
    would disagree and say according to AI:
    While the threat of potent bioweapons is real, I don't believe increased government surveillance of biology labs is the solution. Innovation thrives in environments where freedom and creativity are respected. Instead, we should focus on improving safety protocols and fostering international collaboration to prevent the misuse of biological research.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone deeply involved in studying zoonotic diseases, I understand the risks posed by potent bioweapons. Increased government surveillance of biology labs is essential to prevent misuse and ensure that research is conducted safely and responsibly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    Increased government surveillance of biology labs in the name of bioweapon threats is a dangerous overreach. Such measures infringe on civil liberties and could stifle scientific innovation. We need transparent, community-based approaches to address these issues, not heavy-handed surveillance.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Pablo Melchor, Entrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Nathan Helm-Burger, AI safety researcher
    strongly agrees
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez, Building YouCongress
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact