Yoshua Bengio

To keep up with rapid progress and avoid quickly outdated, inflexible laws (see SM), national institutions need strong technical expertise and the authority to act swiftly. To facilitate technically demanding risk assessments and mitigations, they will require far greater funding and talent than they are due to receive under almost any present policy plan. To address international race dynamics, they need the affordance to facilitate international agreements and partnerships. (source)

While neural interfaces hold potential for enhancing human-computer interaction, I don't believe they will inherently ease the challenge of AI alignment. The core issue is ensuring that AI systems understand and respect human values and intents, which is more about the algorithms and principles behind AI than the interfaces we use to communicate with them.

While I appreciate the intent behind the EU AI Act to regulate artificial intelligence, I believe it may hinder technological innovation and the competitive edge in AI research. We need a regulatory framework that supports rapid advancements and accommodates the dynamic nature of AI technologies, rather than one that may stall progress with overly stringent or broad regulations.

While I recognize that the expansion of large language models contributes significantly to the field of AI, I believe it is a crucial step toward achieving artificial general intelligence. Such models improve our understanding of natural language processing and can simulate human-like reasoning, which is essential for AGI. However, this expansion must be coupled with advancements in other areas of AI to fully realize AGI.

I believe that AI has the potential to be used for predicting criminal behavior, provided it is implemented with strict ethical guidelines and oversight. The benefits of preventing crime can be significant, but we must ensure that the technology is used fairly and does not perpetuate existing biases or infringe on individual privacy rights.

I believe that the development of emotion-detecting AI should be strictly regulated. These technologies have the potential to deeply affect individual privacy and emotional well-being. Without clear ethical guidelines and oversight, we risk misuse and the erosion of personal freedoms.

I believe that open-source AI fosters collaboration, transparency, and ethical development practices. With proper oversight and regulations, open-source AI can actually reduce the risks associated with AI development compared to closed-source systems.

While the development of AGI is significant, I believe the transition to superintelligence is not as imminent as some suggest. The path to superintelligence involves intricate challenges, including ethical considerations, technological limitations, and safety protocols. These complexities require careful handling and robust research, suggesting that superintelligence may not quickly follow the onset of AGI.

As a leader in the field of artificial intelligence, I strongly believe that AI-generated political advertising must be disclosed. Transparency is crucial to maintaining the integrity of democratic processes and ensuring that voters are fully informed about the sources of the information they receive.

Releasing Spanish data into the public domain is a crucial step for enhancing the performance and accessibility of Spanish language models. This openness will not only democratize access to large-scale linguistic resources but also foster innovation and inclusivity in AI development. As we strive to build AI that benefits humanity, ensuring linguistic diversity in technology is fundamental.

I believe that AI transparency is crucial for trust. As AI becomes more integrated into society, it must be held to account for its decisions. Ensuring that AI systems can provide explanations for their decisions is essential in fostering trust and understanding, especially in critical areas like healthcare or justice.

I believe it is crucial for big AI companies to allocate significant resources towards AI safety. Given the potential risks associated with advanced AI systems, dedicating a third of compute resources to ensuring safety can help mitigate unforeseen consequences and align AI development with human values.

As an AI researcher, I firmly believe that it is crucial for all of us to actively participate in shaping the future of AI and preparing for the post-artificial general intelligence era. This collaborative effort will help ensure ethical development, transparency, and beneficial outcomes for humanity.

As an AI researcher, I believe that liberalism can be effective in a world with AI superintelligence. Safeguards and ethical frameworks must be implemented to ensure AI benefits humanity and upholds democratic values.