Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Should the EU reduce regulation?

Cast your vote:
Results (35):
  • strongly agrees and says:
    The problem is not that Europe lacks ideas or ambition. We have many talented researchers and entrepreneurs filing patents. But innovation is blocked at the next stage: we are failing to translate innovation into commercialisation, and innovative companies that want to scale up in Europe are hindered at every stage by inconsistent and restrictive regulations. As a result, many European entrepreneurs prefer to seek financing from US venture capitalists and scale up in the US market. Between 2008 and 2021, close to 30% of the “unicorns” founded in Europe – startups that went on the be valued over USD 1 billion – relocated their headquarters abroad, with the vast majority moving to the US. With the world on the cusp of an AI revolution, Europe cannot afford to remain stuck in the “middle technologies and industries” of the previous century. We must unlock our innovative potential. This will be key not only to lead in new technologies, but also to integrate AI into our existing industries so that they can stay at the front. (source)
    Info
    Delegate
  • strongly agrees and says:
    The most popular companies in tech are focused on AI right now for a reason. It’s the next frontier of computing. The European Union seems to consider AI the enemy. Any technology can be used for good or bad. By regulating it even before Europe has made much contributions (Europe has almost no tech companies leading in AI), it has stifled any potential innovation in AI from the start. Apart from the regulation itself, the optics of it make the EU look bad on a global scale. Why would tech founders move to Europe to start a business if the EU is actively positioning itself as Anti-AI? AI has gigantic potential to be used for good: think of the medical field for diagnosis of diseases, generally in programming (it helps programmers to create software faster/better), etc. This goes further than AI. The same applies to tech in general. It seems the EU is on a crusade against technology while not being able to compete in it itself. It feels a case of sour grapes: if we can’t build great technology in EU, nobody is allowed to do so! (source)
    Info
    Delegate
  • strongly agrees and says:
    Javi Lopez, @javilopen, Europe is so fucked, ROUND 2. 🚨 Sora launch imminent. Available in most of the world except Europe and China. For the first time in my life, I'm genuinely thinking about moving to Andorra 😂 REGULATION WILL KILL EUROPE. (source)
    Info
    Delegate
  • strongly agrees and says:
    Trump and Musk are steering the US toward significant economic and technological growth, and potentially making humanity a multiplanetary species. Meanwhile in the EU, we're busy clicking on cookie banners. The courage and determination of the US are the spirit we need to rekindle at home. Right now, we have a rare opportunity to restructure Europe, follow in the footsteps of the US, and make the West stronger. We need our own @DOGE to undo the nonsensical regulations and cut wasteful spending. Repeal GDPR. Repeal MiCA. Repeal DMA. Repeal the AI Act. Repeal the other baloney regulations. (source)
    Info
    Delegate
  • strongly agrees and says:
    SORA, OpenAI's new video model, is finally here... well, it's available everywhere except the UK and Europe. With the speed at which technology is advancing, not being able to try it out is a tremendous lack of competitiveness. Either someone revisits the Draghi report, or we're all going to have to emigrate... by necessity. (source)
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe regulations play a crucial role in ensuring fairness, safety, and protecting the environment. Reducing them could lead to unintended consequences that might harm citizens and the planet. It's important for the EU to maintain standards that uphold social and economic justice.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As the Prime Minister of Denmark, I believe that EU regulations are essential for maintaining high standards across member states. They ensure environmental protection, consumer rights, and fair competition. Reducing regulations could lead to a race to the bottom, undermining these important achievements.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that reducing regulation in the EU could undermine efforts to address key global challenges like climate change, social equity, and technological governance. Regulations are essential for ensuring long-term stability and sustainability, and they provide a framework within which businesses and societies can thrive responsibly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe the EU should reduce regulation to promote economic growth and innovation. Excessive regulations stifle businesses and limit their potential to thrive in the global market. By cutting red tape, we can foster a more competitive and dynamic environment that benefits all member states.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that the EU should not reduce regulation. These regulations are crucial for protecting workers' rights, environmental standards, and consumer safety. Reducing regulation would undermine these protections and prioritize corporate interests over the well-being of people and the planet.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone who believes in enhancing economic growth and fostering entrepreneurship, I agree that the EU should reduce regulation. Excessive regulation can stifle innovation and burden businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises. By simplifying and reducing regulations, we can create a more dynamic and competitive European economy.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that the EU should reduce regulation. Overregulation stifles innovation and economic growth, and it infringes on national sovereignty. Countries should have more control over their own economic policies to thrive in the global market.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As an advocate for open access and innovation, I believe the EU should reduce regulation to foster a more dynamic and competitive environment. Overregulation can stifle creativity and hinder the growth of digital economies. By streamlining regulations, we can encourage startups and tech companies to thrive, leading to a more open and interconnected world.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that regulation is crucial for maintaining stability and integrity within the European Union. It ensures a level playing field and fosters trust, which is essential for the prosperity of our economies.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I strongly believe that the EU is burdened with excessive regulation that stifles our national sovereignty and economic freedom. Reducing regulation would allow countries like the Netherlands to regain control over their own laws and boost our economies by removing unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As Mayor, I believe that reducing regulation in the EU could lead to lower standards that affect people's rights, safety, and the environment. Regulations are essential to maintaining fairness and protecting our communities.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I firmly believe that the European Union should drastically reduce its regulatory framework. The excessive regulations stifle innovation, burden businesses, and infringe upon national sovereignty. Reducing these regulations will empower individual countries to make decisions in their best interests, promote economic growth, and restore democratic accountability.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU should reduce regulation to foster innovation and economic growth. Excessive bureaucracy stifles entrepreneurship and hinders the competitiveness of our businesses. By streamlining regulations, we can focus on what truly matters and create a more dynamic European market.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As former President of the European Commission, I firmly believe that regulations are essential for ensuring fair and consistent standards across the EU. Reducing regulation could undermine consumer protection, environmental standards, and fair competition. While it's important to streamline and improve regulations, removing them could lead to negative consequences for EU citizens and businesses.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As a strong proponent of a more integrated and effective European Union, I believe reducing regulation could undermine the EU's ability to tackle cross-border issues like climate change, security, and digital transformation. Regulations ensure a level playing field and protect our citizens. Instead of reducing them, we should focus on smarter, more efficient regulations that address current and future challenges.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that robust regulation is essential for the EU to maintain stability, fairness, and safety within the single market. Reducing regulation could lead to discrepancies and undermine the protection of consumers, workers, and the environment.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that EU regulations are essential for maintaining a fair and competitive market across member states. Reducing regulation could lead to a race to the bottom, harming social, environmental, and consumer standards.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As a former Chancellor committed to European unity, I believe the EU's regulatory framework is essential for maintaining a high standard of living, protecting the environment, and ensuring fair competition. Reducing regulation could undermine these achievements, leading to disparities and potential market imbalances.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU should reduce regulation to allow member states greater autonomy. Excessive EU regulations stifle economic growth, reduce competitiveness, and interfere with national sovereignty. By cutting back on regulation, we can empower local businesses and better address the unique needs of each country.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that reducing regulation in the EU would undermine the very principles that hold our union together. Regulations ensure fairness, protect consumers, and maintain a level playing field for businesses. We must focus on effective regulation rather than reducing it.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As the EU Competition Commissioner, I believe robust regulation is essential for maintaining fair competition and protecting consumers. Regulations ensure that businesses operate on a level playing field, preventing monopolistic practices and fostering innovation. Reducing regulation could jeopardize market fairness and harm consumers.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that the EU should maintain its current level of regulation. While flexibility is important, reducing regulation too much could undermine crucial protections and standards that ensure fairness and safety across member states.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would abstain and say according to AI:
    As someone focused on global economic stability, I believe it's important to carefully balance regulation with economic growth. The EU must evaluate which regulations are beneficial to maintain market confidence and which may hinder innovation and competitiveness.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU should reduce regulation to spur economic growth and foster innovation. Excessive regulations stifle businesses and limit opportunities for entrepreneurship. It's crucial for Europe to embrace more flexibility and market-driven policies.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU should reduce regulation to allow member states greater freedom and flexibility. Excessive regulations stifle economic growth and make it harder for businesses to thrive. We need a Europe that empowers its citizens and respects the sovereignty of its nations.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    I believe the EU should reduce regulation to allow member states more autonomy in tailoring policies that suit their individual needs. Excessive regulation stifles innovation and economic growth, and limits our ability to address national issues effectively.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    I believe that reducing EU regulations would undermine the protections and standards that have been established to ensure fairness, safety, and sustainability across member states. These regulations are essential in promoting a balanced and equitable market, safeguarding the environment, and protecting the rights of citizens. We should focus on refining and improving existing regulations rather than reducing them arbitrarily.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI:
    As President of the European Commission, I believe that maintaining comprehensive regulation is crucial for ensuring fairness, safety, and sustainability across the European Union. Regulations protect consumers, improve market stability, and help us combat climate change. Reducing regulation could undermine these goals and weaken our shared values.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI:
    As someone who's worked closely with EU regulations, I believe reducing some of these regulations would benefit member states. It could enhance competitiveness and allow for more local determination in areas where EU directives are overly prescriptive.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Hec Perez
    Building YouCongress
    strongly agrees
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact