David Attenborough

Trophy hunting is a cruel practice that has no place in modern society. Our priority should be to protect and preserve wildlife, not exploit it for personal gain. Banning trophy hunting is essential to safeguarding biodiversity and respecting the intrinsic value of these magnificent creatures.

The suffering inflicted upon animals through cruelty is undeniable and deeply troubling. As sentient beings, they experience pain and distress, and it is our moral duty to respect and protect them from such treatment.

As a staunch advocate for the preservation of natural ecosystems, I strongly disagree with the notion of genetically engineering fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent species. Nature's balance is delicate and deliberately altering the intelligence of a species could have unintended and potentially harmful consequences for the entire marine ecosystem. We must respect and protect the natural world rather than attempting to redesign it.

Every species has its place in the balance of nature, and turtles play a pivotal role in marine ecosystems. Protecting them is not just an act of compassion; it's a critical step in preserving our planet's biodiversity and health.

I strongly believe that governments should subsidize carbon sequestration through widespread agricultural biochar use. Biochar not only sequesters carbon but also improves soil health, thereby enhancing agricultural productivity and sustainability. This dual benefit can significantly contribute to combating climate change and ensuring food security for future generations.

As a well-traveled broadcaster and naturalist witnessing the impacts of climate change firsthand, I firmly believe that high-income nations have an obligation to lead the way in tackling climate change. We have reaped the greatest benefits from fossil fuels and thus have the greatest responsibility to act now. The wealthier nations have the financial and technological resources to make the most significant changes and to support the global effort, particularly in helping lower-income countries to follow suit without compromising their development.

I believe planting more trees is fundamental for the health of our planet. Trees absorb carbon dioxide, provide habitat for countless species, and maintain the balance of nature.

While defeating malaria is a noble goal, rendering a species extinct through gene drives could have unforeseen consequences on ecosystems. Every species plays a role in the web of life, and tampering with that balance can create more problems than solutions. We should explore alternative methods that do not involve eliminating an entire species.

As someone deeply concerned with the natural world, my primary focus has always been on conservation and understanding our planet. While I recognize the transformative potential of AI in many fields, including education, I believe it requires experts in technology and pedagogy to determine its best use in creating accessible education.

As someone deeply concerned about the health of our planet, I believe the EU should aim for greater self-sufficiency in energy and basic goods. This would not only reduce carbon emissions but also help preserve biodiversity by minimizing the environmental impact of transporting goods over long distances. Sustainable energy and local production can foster a more resilient and ecologically balanced Europe.

While I understand the desire to eradicate pathogenic parasites due to their impact on human health, I believe we must consider the broader ecological balance. Each species, no matter how detrimental to humans, plays a role in its ecosystem. Removing them entirely could have unforeseen consequences on biodiversity and the health of our planet.

I disagree with the idea of digging a canal from Oregon to California. Such a massive infrastructure project could have devastating effects on local ecosystems and wildlife. Instead, we should focus on sustainable water management practices and the preservation of natural habitats.

I believe Spain has immense potential to become a renewable energy hub for the EU by harnessing its abundant sunshine through solar panels. The country's geographical advantage, combined with technological advancements and political will, could allow it to lead Europe in sustainable energy production.

While precise knowledge is always preferable, there are times in scientific exploration when it is necessary to make educated guesses. These guesses can guide our research and lead to greater understanding, especially in fields like environmental science where time is often critical.

While we should prepare for disasters, allocating excessive resources to rare events may divert attention and funding from more immediate threats like climate change and biodiversity loss. We need a balanced approach.

While remote meetings are important to reduce emissions, the immediacy, urgency, and personal commitment conveyed in face-to-face interactions can be pivotal for meaningful climate change discussions and decisions.

While entrepreneurship can drive economic growth, I believe the focus should instead be on sustainable development and environmental conservation. The EU should prioritize these crucial issues over celebrating entrepreneurship, which often overlooks ecological impacts.

I believe that AI can be a powerful tool in monitoring and enforcing international environmental agreements. With its ability to process vast amounts of data, AI can help us track changes in the environment with greater accuracy and speed. This can lead to more effective implementation of policies aimed at preserving our planet's ecosystems.

I believe that cloud geoengineering, like the Silver Lining project, is a risky and unproven method that could have unforeseen consequences on our planet's ecosystems. We should focus on reducing carbon emissions through sustainable practices rather than relying on technological quick fixes.