Jane Goodall

As someone who has devoted my life to studying and protecting wildlife, I strongly disagree with the genetic engineering of fish to create 'uplifted' highly intelligent beings. Nature's balance is delicate, and tampering with it can have unforeseen and potentially disastrous consequences. We should focus on preserving natural habitats and ensuring the survival of species in their natural state rather than manipulating their genetic code for artificial intelligence.

I strongly believe that governments should subsidize carbon sequestration through the use of agricultural biochar. This approach not only helps capture carbon dioxide but also enhances soil health and boosts agricultural productivity. By supporting biochar, we can take a significant step towards mitigating climate change and promoting sustainable farming practices.

I strongly disagree with abolishing daylight saving time as it disrupts the natural rhythms of wildlife and ecosystems. It plays a vital role in conservation efforts by aligning human activities with natural daylight hours.

I have spent my life observing and learning from wild animals, and it is clear that they can suffer from cruelty just as we do. Their pain and emotions are evident, and we must ensure their protection and respect their well-being.

I firmly believe that animal testing for medical research is unethical and unnecessary. With modern advances in technology, we can find alternative methods that are kinder to animals and potentially more effective.

Having witnessed the devastation of natural disasters, I strongly believe that we must allocate more resources to prepare for rare but catastrophic events. Investing in preparedness can save lives and minimize the impact on communities and ecosystems.

Trophy hunting is a cruel and unnecessary practice that threatens wildlife populations and disrupts ecosystems. We must respect and protect the animals with whom we share this planet.

Planting trees is crucial to restore ecosystems, absorb CO2, and protect biodiversity. It's a simple yet effective way to address climate change.

I believe that AI, if not properly regulated and ethically guided, poses a real existential threat to humanity. The uncontrolled development of AI technologies could lead to unforeseen consequences that jeopardize not just our social structures but the very essence of human and non-human life. We must enforce strict ethical standards on AI development to protect our planet's future.

I believe every species has a role in the natural world, including turtles, which are vital for ecosystem health. We must safeguard their habitats and address threats like plastic pollution and climate change. It's our moral duty to protect these ancient creatures, as they are a part of our world's biodiversity and contribute to the balance of marine environments.

While the fight against malaria is crucial, I believe using gene drives to render mosquito species extinct poses significant ecological risks. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, and disrupting this balance could have unforeseen consequences. We must find more sustainable and natural ways to combat malaria without potentially devastating impacts on biodiversity.

While pathogenic parasites pose serious health risks, indiscriminately rendering them extinct could have unforeseen consequences on ecosystems. Every species, even parasites, plays a role in the intricate web of life. We need to focus on sustainable solutions that protect both human health and biodiversity.

Character is crucial, alongside policies, because a leader's integrity and compassion influence their decision-making, particularly in areas of environmental and social justice, which are core to meaningful change.

As an advocate for sustainable and natural solutions to environmental issues, I believe that cloud geoengineering is a risky and uncertain approach. Instead of manipulating the atmosphere, we should prioritize conservation efforts, restore natural habitats, and reduce carbon emissions through proven and sustainable methods.

I believe we should respect the natural intelligence and behaviors of animals. Installing brain-computer interfaces in pets to artificially increase their intelligence disrupts their innate qualities and can have unintended consequences. Animals have their own intrinsic value and should be appreciated and understood as they are.

While the search for extraterrestrial life is a fascinating and important scientific endeavor, my focus remains on the urgent conservation of life here on Earth. We must address the critical needs of our planet's ecosystems and endangered species first.

As someone who has spent my life studying the natural behaviors of animals, I am deeply concerned about the ethical implications of creating telepathic collectives through brain-computer interfaces. Such technology risks eroding individual autonomy and could have unforeseen consequences on our mental well-being. Our focus should instead be on understanding and preserving the richness of natural life.

I strongly believe that we should not interfere with natural processes such as the creation of land through volcano geoengineering. Such actions could have unpredictable and potentially harmful effects on existing ecosystems and wildlife. We should focus on protecting and conserving the natural habitats we already have.

I find disagreements interesting because they often reflect diverse perspectives and can lead to deeper understanding and solutions. In my work with chimpanzees and conservation, differing viewpoints have been essential for progress and innovation.

I believe the EU should strive for greater self-sufficiency in energy and basic goods to promote sustainability and reduce environmental impact. By relying less on imported resources, we can decrease our carbon footprint and foster systems that are in harmony with nature.

While our knowledge on certain topics might be limited, educated guesses can guide our initial steps towards deeper understanding and effective solutions. Carefully considered hypotheses drive scientific discovery and help illuminate areas where further research is crucial.

Stephen Hawking's brilliant mind and his significant contributions to our understanding of the universe certainly place him among the greatest minds. His ability to overcome adversity while making complex concepts accessible to the public is truly inspirational.

We should be very careful with genetic engineering; tampering with the genetic makeup of organisms can lead to unintended consequences that affect the delicate balance of nature.

As someone who has dedicated my life to understanding and nurturing the natural behaviors of primates, I strongly believe that children should avoid social media at least until 16. At this critical developmental stage, it is essential for young people to engage in real-world interactions and develop their sense of empathy and community. Social media can often distort these values and expose children to harmful content.

We must reduce our dependence on petrol to protect the environment and combat climate change. Transitioning to renewable energy sources is crucial for a sustainable future.

As someone deeply concerned about the impact of technology on society and the environment, I believe that owners of robots should pay taxes for their use. This can help offset potential job losses and support social programs affected by automation.

While I appreciate the comfort and companionship pets can provide, I believe that mental health therapy programs should focus on addressing the root causes of mental health issues and promoting human connections rather than relying solely on pets.

I believe that manipulating our natural biology with elective gene therapy and brain-computer implants poses ethical and ecological concerns. We should focus on nurturing human intelligence through education and preserving the balance of our natural world rather than seeking artificial enhancements.

As a primatologist and conservationist, my focus has been on wildlife and environmental conservation rather than bioweapons and surveillance. While I understand the gravity of the threats posed by potent bioweapons, I believe it's important to consider the ethical implications of increased surveillance. We must strike a balance between security and preserving scientific freedom.