Biased? Add real quotes to replace AI-generated perspectives. Read more.

Can remote meetings suffice for climate change discussions?

Cast your vote:
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe that remote meetings are a highly effective tool for international dialogue on climate change. They reduce the carbon footprint associated with travel and allow for more inclusive participation, enabling real-time, global collaboration which is essential to combat this pressing issue.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    While face-to-face engagement is invaluable, the pandemic has shown us that remote meetings can indeed suffice for climate change discussions, expanding inclusivity and reducing carbon footprints.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    Remote meetings cannot replace the urgency and collaborative spirit fostered by in-person dialogues on climate change. The complex nature of these discussions requires the nuanced and immediate exchange of ideas and commitments that only physical presence can offer.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    Remote meetings have proven to be an invaluable tool in the fight against climate change. They allow for continuous, inclusive, and far-reaching dialogue that can accelerate action and decision-making without the carbon footprint associated with travel.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe remote meetings can be a powerful tool for climate discussions. They reduce emissions from travel and allow for more inclusive global participation.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    While remote meetings have a lower carbon footprint and have been a necessary tool during the pandemic, they cannot fully replace face-to-face negotiations for climate change discussions, where complex nuances and high-stake decisions necessitate direct human engagement and the building of trust that only comes from in-person interaction.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    While in-person engagement is valuable, remote meetings can effectively address climate change discussions, harnessing technology and reducing our carbon footprint from travel.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    While nothing can fully replace the power of in-person diplomacy, remote meetings have an important role to play in tackling global challenges like climate change. They offer a way to maintain momentum on critical issues in between larger conferences and can reduce our own carbon footprint.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    Yes, remote meetings can be effective for climate change discussions. They reduce travel-related carbon emissions and allow more global participation. We have the technology to collaborate efficiently from afar, enabling us to address the climate crisis more rapidly and broadly.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    While in-person collaboration is valuable, remote meetings can certainly suffice for discussions on climate change. They offer the immediacy and global reach essential for addressing such a universally critical issue.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would strongly disagree and say according to AI
    Remote meetings cannot replace the urgent human connections and negotiations required to address climate change effectively. We are facing an existential crisis that demands the full engagement and collaboration of global leaders in person, to harness the collective determination and innovation necessary for this challenge.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe remote meetings have a crucial role in the fight against climate change. They significantly reduce the carbon footprint of international gatherings and allow inclusive participation from all corners of the world. However, there is also value in face-to-face diplomacy, so a balance must be struck.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    I believe remote meetings can be highly effective for climate change discussions. They lower our carbon footprint by reducing travel and can be more inclusive, allowing participation from across the globe.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would disagree and say according to AI
    While remote meetings are important to reduce emissions, the immediacy, urgency, and personal commitment conveyed in face-to-face interactions can be pivotal for meaningful climate change discussions and decisions.
    Info
    Delegate
  • would agree and say according to AI
    As global leaders, we must adopt the technologies that allow us to meet virtually to address pressing issues like climate change efficiently. Remote meetings can significantly reduce the carbon footprint associated with travel for international conferences, while still enabling productive and decisive action.
    Info
    Delegate

Votes without a comment:

  • Jon Mountjoy, Human behaviour, history, evolution, friends, food, genetics, rationality, reason, words, culture, travel and code.
    disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • disagrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Hec Perez, Building YouCongress
    strongly disagrees
    Info
    Delegate
  • Carlos, Marie Curie fellow for the #REVAMMAD project, conducting research in medical imaging at @FORTH_Hellas. PhD candidate in computer vision at #UniversityOfCrete.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
  • Pablo Melchor, Entrepreneur, expert trial-and-error learner. Working to improve the world in the most effective ways @ayuda_efectiva. Member and ambassador @givingwhatwecan.
    agrees via delegates
    Info
    Delegate
Terms · Privacy · Contact